Jump to content

Army officer calls Obama "Usurper" President


Kingfisher

Recommended Posts

We're actually disputing his intelligence, or the seemingly lack thereof :lol:

 

People, let's adhere to the most appropriate saying: don't feed the troll.

Why is he a troll Kash? You keep posting he is a troll.

Define a troll please.

I was under the impression a troll posts flaming statements towards others that have nothing to do with the topic.

Rehit just seems to be a staunch Republican , if that constitues a troll then I am guilty as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Go read his posts in the pre and post election threads. I suggest popping some Advil and getting a bag of popcorn for the level of entertainment he provides.

 

Being a Republican has nothing to do with it. I'm not a self-professed Democrat, I'm a moderate. I have no qualms with our more conservative members, such as Lo. Heck, a bunch of staff are rather conservative and I get along with them just fine, and if I didn't I wouldn't be working with them. However, Rehit doesn't fall into this category, he's in his own little ignorant, intolerant, uneducated, and most likely highly prejudiced category.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd like to point out that a few of the posts in thread violate rule 2. Disagreements are fine, please keep it civil.

Posting links to source articles is always helpful. Calling something a fact requires citing a source, or at least that's how it used to work back in college.

BTW this popcorn and soda is pretty tasty.

S7301012.JPG

 

I think I'll try for something constructive in the afternoon, long day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Go read his posts in the pre and post election threads. I suggest popping some Advil and getting a bag of popcorn for the level of entertainment he provides.

 

Being a Republican has nothing to do with it. I'm not a self-professed Democrat, I'm a moderate. I have no qualms with our more conservative members, such as Lo. Heck, a bunch of staff are rather conservative and I get along with them just fine, and if I didn't I wouldn't be working with them. However, Rehit doesn't fall into this category, he's in his own little ignorant, intolerant, uneducated, and most likely highly prejudiced category.

 

unlike you i am already very well educated and have a Mechanical Engineering degree...

i am not trying to join the cesspool of lawyers that helped to create the majority of the mess we are in now.

i own my own very successful businesses and have employess of all races and gender.

i even employ legal Mexicans...

you do not care for my posts because they attack your candidate with the truth.

in all this name calling and attempts to discredit me you never address any of the things i have pointed out.

you avoid them and try to change the subject just like a good little democrat.

you may not call yourself a democrat but you have the game down quite well.

what you have to understand is that many of us are Americans and are not from either party.

we are trying to resist the onslaught of socialism against our country.

you are the one acting like a troll, not me.

i did not come in here flaming you and trying to change the subject.

you did that to me.

i responded to a statement that he had passed various security clearances.

this is not true and has been proven.

every one of my employees has to pass these security clearances and i am quite familiar with them.

he would have been disqualified in the vetting process to work for us because of the fact he could not pass the background checks to even look at the drawings...

links were provided when the subject came up before the election.

if people want to know the truth they should seek it out for themselves.

you also attacked me for posting the fact that he wanted to require community service of the citizens.

this was also true and was even reinforced by the fact that they removed the entire website, which belonged to him.

if you do not like my statements of truth why don't you try and find a way to dispute them instead of calling me names and trying to divert attention from the real issue?

oh...

thats right...

it is quite hard to dispute what is true...

heres a little one for you to try and duck.

the stock market cannot be fooled by smoke and mirrors like the general public.

can you tell the stimulus is not working yet?

it never will with the attitude towards business and success that permeates this administration.

did you even know that China (a communist country) just cut their corporate tax rates?

they have some clue how to stimulate their economy and encourage investment.

China Cuts Taxes

 

 

now go ahead and attack me and try to change the subject...

you ignorance makes mine pale in it's shadow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you avoid them and try to change the subject just like a good little democrat.

It's really hard to believe someone is a moderate when they use the name of either party as a put-down.

 

i responded to a statement that he had passed various security clearances.

this is not true and has been proven.

Statements like this generally come with links.

 

you ignorance makes mine pale in it's shadow.

This one's just my favorite, I don't really have anything to add.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

there were links provided before the election and you were involved in the thread.

a simple google seach will show the facts as presented.

you should seek the truth for yourself...

i cannot help the fact that attacking the messenger and trying to discredit them are traits of the democrat party.

all of this is pointless when you are dealing with people who refuse to face the truth.

it will all come to fruition soon enough at the expense of our county and all of your 401K's...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i am not trying to join the cesspool of lawyers that helped to create the majority of the mess we are in now.

 

Oh hey, a lawyer joke. That's funny! :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

here is a "link" that explains why i make this point...

the material is from before the election but does not have anything to do with changing any of the content...

Obama couldn't be cleared

 

this is one major sticking point that we know he would never agree to...

 

IF THERE IS SOME hesitancy to accept that Barack Obama's associations would have precluded his obtaining a TS clearance with compartmented information access, it should be realized he would have had to pass both a polygraph test and a personal psychological evaluation. What are the chances of his being willing to take these tests, to say nothing of his passing, in light of his refusal even to make his educational records available?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's just funny. Or maybe sad.

 

To prove that what you've said is a "fact", you've linked to an opinion article from a known conservative news source.

 

There is no possibility that a Top Secret clearance would be awarded to a member of the Armed Forces whose background included such associations. An intelligence service clearance for the handling of highly classified material would be totally out of the question.

Says who?! This is an opinion, plain and simple, made by people who obviously think a lot more of the Ayers/Rezko stuff than the rest of us. Obama is NOT the first president to have associations like this. Politicians mix it up with a LOT of people. Just because some conservative magazine writer thinks this would disqualify him doesn't mean it's a fact. Yet again, you see something that you like, and you assume it's a fact, and then represent it as one. THIS IS NOT A FACT.

 

IF THERE IS SOME hesitancy to accept that Barack Obama's associations would have precluded his obtaining a TS clearance with compartmented information access, it should be realized he would have had to pass both a polygraph test and a personal psychological evaluation. What are the chances of his being willing to take these tests, to say nothing of his passing, in light of his refusal even to make his educational records available?

There's a difference between being unwilling to pander to every crack-pot who doubts his origins and being unwilling to submit documents for an official security clearance. Yet again, this is an assumption by a biased writer that he wouldn't submit to these tests. IT IS NOT FACT.

 

This whole Ayers/Rezko thing is a big joke. If you doubt that, just look at how McCain/Palin used it. Even they knew there was nothing there. McCain constantly said "I don't care about a washed up old terrorist, I just want to know if there's more to the relationship. The people deserve to know." But he already did know, and it's obvious. You think his people didn't look into it? You think he didn't have people poring over that info? And yet they never said more than "we'd like to know more". If they had something, they'd have used it. But they didn't, so they just used the bits they did have to place doubt in people's minds. They'd say "Gee, I wonder if there's more here." and just hope that people's minds would wander to something worse. In the case of in-the-tank Republicans like yourself, their minds had no problems drawing a nice little Hitler mustache and devil horns on Obama's face. As for the rest of America, it was pretty obvious by the election results that most people saw right through it. McCain and Palin couldn't produce anything substantial, and there's a reason for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...