Gr4vitas Posted March 5, 2009 Posted March 5, 2009 (edited) I'll know if he is a good president in about a year, I'll pass no judgment until then. Also - What the !%^ does it matter where someone is from, what color they are, how tall they are, how racist they are, how smelly they are, how abusive they are how ANYTHING they are. If they're a good leader and fix .... and cater to the needs of the people, and do things that please them... Edit: I wouldn't care if he was a damn satan worshiper if he is a good president and leads our country well. That is his job right? Edited March 5, 2009 by Gr4vitas Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrewr05 Posted March 5, 2009 Posted March 5, 2009 AGREED He could turn out to be the best thing for this country, we won't know until his term is up however... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rehit Posted March 5, 2009 Posted March 5, 2009 He has had security clearances. Clearances that were checked very thoroughly, long before his "backers" had sights on the White House. Those clearances would have turned up anything shady pertaining to his orgin of birth long ago. this is not true... he may have had "clearances" but he could not pass the basic security clearance requirements many of us have to pass to do defense work. this was pointed out here and proven several times during the election. the facts were just overlooked and dismissed. his mere association with known terrorists and criminals disqualifies him immediately. you do have to understand many of the things required of citizens are often overlooked by and for poilticians. just look at Tim Geitner or Charlie Rangel for some examples. Charlie Rangel heads the ethics commitee for god sakes... if any of us did what either of these people did we would be on our way to jail... we damn sure would not be posing as leaders of government... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krieg1337 Posted March 5, 2009 Posted March 5, 2009 this is not true...he may have had "clearances" but he could not pass the basic security clearance requirements many of us have to pass to do defense work. this was pointed out here and proven several times during the election. the facts were just overlooked and dismissed. his mere association with known terrorists and criminals disqualifies him immediately. you do have to understand many of the things required of citizens are often overlooked by and for poilticians. just look at Tim Geitner or Charlie Rangel for some examples. Charlie Rangel heads the ethics commitee for god sakes... if any of us did what either of these people did we would be on our way to jail... we damn sure would not be posing as leaders of government... There you go. I don't see why everyone keeps thinking Obama got through every single security check without "cheating". Anyways, this shouldn't happen now as then this country would probably get even worse, should have checked this stuff before he was president. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archerzz Posted March 5, 2009 Posted March 5, 2009 I'll know if he is a good president in about a year, I'll pass no judgment until then. True dat let him do his job change dosnt come over night. We wont know if he was the right choice for at least a year or so. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verran Posted March 5, 2009 Posted March 5, 2009 this is not true...he may have had "clearances" but he could not pass the basic security clearance requirements many of us have to pass to do defense work. this was pointed out here and proven several times during the election. the facts were just overlooked and dismissed. his mere association with known terrorists and criminals disqualifies him immediately. you do have to understand many of the things required of citizens are often overlooked by and for poilticians. just look at Tim Geitner or Charlie Rangel for some examples. Charlie Rangel heads the ethics commitee for god sakes... if any of us did what either of these people did we would be on our way to jail... we damn sure would not be posing as leaders of government... Let it go man. Just let it go. We can't always get what we want, but how we handle our defeats says a lot about us. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archerzz Posted March 5, 2009 Posted March 5, 2009 Yea, even McCain in his speech immediately following his loss in the election he called Obama his President. (says a lot about him) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rehit Posted March 5, 2009 Posted March 5, 2009 i have not been defeated... that is what they want but can never have. i am just pointing out that statement i quoted from this thread is untrue. the man could not pass the basic security check to work on a DOD or DOE project. this is true as are the points i made about the tax evaders... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kash Posted March 5, 2009 Posted March 5, 2009 this is not true...he may have had "clearances" but he could not pass the basic security clearance requirements many of us have to pass to do defense work. this was pointed out here and proven several times during the election. the facts were just overlooked and dismissed. his mere association with known terrorists and criminals disqualifies him immediately. you do have to understand many of the things required of citizens are often overlooked by and for poilticians. just look at Tim Geitner or Charlie Rangel for some examples. Charlie Rangel heads the ethics commitee for god sakes... if any of us did what either of these people did we would be on our way to jail... we damn sure would not be posing as leaders of government... No, it was never "proven" like you say, it was simply alleged by you. Just because you kept saying it over and over again doesn't make it the truth, just means you're an obstinate fool. There you go. I don't see why everyone keeps thinking Obama got through every single security check without "cheating". Anyways, this shouldn't happen now as then this country would probably get even worse, should have checked this stuff before he was president. Don't listen to Rehit, he's just a troll who has surprisingly managed to avoid getting banned. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kamikaze_Badger Posted March 5, 2009 Posted March 5, 2009 Considering the level of clearance he would require as a President, I very much doubt there's much to worry about. Even unit level clearance is pretty stringent. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoArmistead Posted March 6, 2009 Posted March 6, 2009 (edited) I like the poll asking if soldiers who don't support their president should be able to serve. I promise if the soldiers had to "like" Obama to be eligible to serve, our military would be about 75% smaller tomorrow. And if I were the soldier, I'd find something better to do with my time... like disagree with Obama on things that matter, and there is plenty of that to be done. Edited March 6, 2009 by LoArmistead Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tkrow21 Posted March 6, 2009 Posted March 6, 2009 So he says Obama is a fake? Let him go to war, he'll either die or do something productive. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now