Jump to content

Need Help Upgrading From 6800 Ultra


Recommended Posts

I have been reading through numerous posts regarding video card upgrades but I am still unsure on making a decision. My goal is to game at 1920x1080 with all settings max (including AA and AF if possible) on these games:

 

Bioshock, SupCom, Prey, Gears of War, Sins of a Solar Empire, Q4, UT2004, Oblivion w/ texture mods, HL games, CoH, BF2142 & BF2, DoW, D3, Star Wars BF, C&C3, SWEaW, and Farcry to name a few.

 

I will also be purchasing Assassin's Creed, Mass Effect, The Witcher, and CoD4 at some point. I also play older games such as Star Craft, Diablo II, and Baldurs Gate. I have been playing some of these games at 1920x1080 but with settings turned down or with crappy fps. I would also like to play SupCom using both of my monitors in dual view. I know if I SLI I will not be able to use the dual view feature. If I do not SLI, I would need a card powerful enough to run both monitors at their native resolutions.

 

The main points I am focusing on to make my decision are: SLI, heat, overclocking, bottlenecking, and future investment.

 

Keeping all of this in mind, I have been looking at the 8800gt, 8800gts(g92), 4850, and the 4870. After reading reviews and comparing charts, I am leaning closer to getting 2 8800gt's or 2 8800gts' for SLI. I am aware that the 8800gt and the 8800gts are very similar performance-wise (especially if I can overclock the gt's). The only reason I am looking at the gts' is because of their heatsinks. The gt's are single slotted as far as I can tell which can be good for space and if I choose to SLI. But the heat is blown into the case, and with SLI, it will get pretty toasty especially if the cards have a higher oc.

 

The gts's are dual slotted with most of them having the exhaust blowing out of the case. This would help keep the temp down overall and when in SLI. The gt's are cheaper than the gts's but not by much. Also, with the better cooling solution, I could theoretically oc higher on the gts rather than the gt.

 

I have also been looking at the 1gb version of the gt/gts cards. From what I have read, the extra ram is overkill for any game. But at 1920x1080 with AA and AF, I would think it would be used. If I did get 2 8800gt's with 1gb each for SLI, that would equal 2gb of v-ram (I know it is really only considered 1gb for SLI). But would it even work or be utilized under XP-Pro with my 2gb of system ram? I will be playing Oblivion with the bigger texture mods. At that resolution, would the extra v-ram be utilized?

 

My initial budget was right around 300. I could get 2 8000gt's for that price after rebates. I could also get 2 8800gts's for about $40 more. There is also the ATI road with the 4870 for 300 as well but 2 gt's beat it in most games. But choosing the 4870 would give me a one card solution thus not having to deal with potential SLI problems. I am just thinking that one 4850 or a 4870 or even one 8800gt/gts will not give me the performance to meet my goal.

 

Also, I have to keep my current setup in mind. I have read mixed thoughts regarding whether the dual core opty would be a bottleneck for the 4870 or 2 8800gt's. I do plan on overclocking the opty to at least 2.8 (if possible). That might require 2 sticks of new ram instead of the 4 I currently have. Another bottleneck might be the PCI-e lanes and the version. In SLI mine are 8x8 and they are not PCI-e 2.0. I have read that there is a performance drop compared to the 16x16 lanes. As to how much of a drop, I do not know.

 

If I did buy a 4800 card now, I would not be able to buy one later to CF because I can only SLI. But if I bought only one 8800gt/gts now, I could SLI it later. If I did only buy one gt/gts now, I do not think I would be happy at 1920x1080 thus leading me to think to buy 2 now for SLI. But thinking forward, if I bought 2 gt/gts for SLI now and wanted to upgrade later, I would have to get rid of both cards to get a new one. I would not have that problem if I only bought one 4870. But if the opty is indeed a bottleneck for these cards, if and when I upgrade to a new card (lets say within the next 2 years) that card would still be held back by the opty if I still have the same system (which I think I will for at least the next year).

 

Now with the 9800GTX+ and the 4870 X2 coming soon, I have to keep those in mind too. The GTX+ would be great to oc and to SLI but the price looks like it will be starting at $200. I would not be able to buy 2 to SLI right away which then, again, leads me to think that I will not be getting the experience gaming that I would like. The 4870 X2 would be great but the price also looks like it will be out of my range ($500?). The possible bottleneck issue arises again with both of these cards as well. Also I believe the HX620 could power the 8800gt/gts in SLI or the 4870 but the 4870 X2 might be close at load if the opty s oced.

 

 

These are all of the pros and cons and additional info I could think of. I really do not know if it is possible to reach my goal (1920x1080 settings maxed with possible AA and AF) with my current system to begin with. Please let me know what you think. Any suggestions will help. Also I am sorry about the long read but I had to include every aspect to try to give a clear and accurate picture of my situation. Thank you in advance.

 

 

E E Magenis

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SLI in most cases is a waste of money...but in your cases I'd say go for it. SlI'ing two 8800GTS 512mb cards would do you well playing at that resolution for $308 (including MIR) you could get these two cards

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16814127325

 

But they are quite old and with the 4870x2 coming out soon it's a hard choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lets put it this way i dont know if you could get that high of a rez with your current setup even with two 8800 or what ever you get. your cpu is going to be a really big bottle neck. i would be trying to get a new setup if your going to want to game at that kind of settings. also the 4 sticks of ram is a little bottle neck to i would try to get a 2 gig kit of 1 gig each. but if you plan on getting all knew then dont waste your time you could sell your current rig and put it towards a new rig. you could build a very decent rig for 800 dollars not a rig that would play at the rez and settings on those games but it would be a very decent rig everything could still be put on high.

Edited by capthowdy575

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SupCom, Sins of a Solar Empire

With your CPU a new video card isn't going to help. Both are extremely CPU limited even with top-end GPUs.

 

Even my "old" 2900XT choked with my dual core Opteron at 2.5 GHz in those games. :lol: The quad I have now woke it up though...

 

 

Both games also love RAM, I'd suggest getting a quad, 4 GB of memory, and a 4850. :)

 

you could build a very decent rig for 800 dollars not a rig that would play at the rez and settings on those games but it would be a very decent rig everything could still be put on high.

My CPU, memory, cooler, and mobo ran $550 shipped. That leaves $250 for a video card, which is more than enough for a 4850 and is damn close to a 4870. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the key point here is to any card you get, unless you get a new cpu (kinda have to get more than just that) nothing is going to run at 1920x1080 (well atlest with AA/AF on).

 

 

oh wait: diablo 2 will :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well...something better would help (I gained a huge amount of performance going from my X850XT PE (roughly comparable to a 6800) to my 2900XT) but it wouldn't maximize whatever he bought. He certainly wouldn't gain much from an SLI/Crossfire setup with that CPU.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quit bashin' the opty's ;)

 

Most of the games he's got aren't that strenuous. I've managed to get pretty far with a 6800GT and a DC opteron @ 2.4...but I'm held back by the graphics card (can you believe that I paid over $340 for it back in the day?). Got a 8800GTS512 on the way...so I can let you know how that goes. I game at 1680x1050.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i got my 6800gt of launch day for $400 and its the last time i'll ever do that. i wont buy a video card over $200 ever again. lucky i sold it to someone for $240 right before the 7800s came out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i got my 6800gt of launch day for $400 and its the last time i'll ever do that. i wont buy a video card over $200 ever again. lucky i sold it to someone for $240 right before the 7800s came out.

 

Man those were the days.

I miss my Radeon 9700pro :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most of the games he's got aren't that strenuous.

SupCom and Sins are. :)

 

They'll bring that Opteron to it's knees. My "old" desktop as of a month ago was a 2.5 GHz dual core Opteron and both games became unplayable fairly quickly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for all of the suggestions and information. I now fully realize that my system will be a bottleneck but I cannot buy a new one at this time. It will be at least a year and a half before I can put together a new system. I need to upgrade the 6800 now to hold me over till then. Out of the four cards I previously listed (8800gt, 8800gts, 4850, and the 4870), any of these will give me a boost over the 6800. I now need to make a decision based on which one will be least bottlenecked, or does that matter? I just do not want to spend the money on the 4870 if it will give me the exact same performance bottlenecked compared to the 8800gt/gts. I am also guessing it would be silly to get the 8800's in SLI because there would be a greater bottleneck, right?

 

I guess the only way to find out would be to buy 1 8800gt/gts at their low prices and see how that goes. If for some reason there is no bottleneck, I could always pop in another for SLI (and for a cheaper price by then). I could also just do one 4850 or 4870 and see how that goes but again, if there is no bottleneck, I could not get a second one.

 

Any thoughts concerning this new conclusion?

 

Thank you,

 

E E Magenis

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, you'll still go faster if you buy faster cards...it's just that you'll hit a wall at some point where no matter how much graphics horsepower you have you won't get any increase. My 2900XT was definitely being held back by my old CPU (dual core Opteron @ 2.5 GHz). My roommate has a 2 GHz X2 and an 8800GT, he saw a huge increase going from his old 7800GT to the 8800GT in nearly everything except SupCom and Sins.

 

Personally I'd be torn between the 8800GT 512 MB or the 4850. Both are *roughly* the same cost but the 4850 is faster at almost anything for just a little more cost.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...