oldpaint Posted April 19, 2008 Posted April 19, 2008 Hey Kandoo, What program are you using to monitor temps? I tried both Realtemp and Coretemp. There is a 10C difference between the 2 with Realtemp being the lower one. My cpu idle temps are 40C with Realtemp and 50C with Coretemp. Load temps with Coretemp are 65C and Realtemp 10C less. Still not sure which one is the most accurate. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingfisher Posted April 20, 2008 Posted April 20, 2008 have your tried using TAT? It reports very close to what coretemp reports, for me. I would trust coretemp/TAT over any of the motherboard supplied temp monitors except maybe motherboard monitor. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prospector Posted April 20, 2008 Posted April 20, 2008 I ended up replacing my Coolit Systems Eliminator with the OCZ Vendetta 2 And I'm glad I did. Cooler temps and less noise.4.0ghz 1.36v 55-57 load temps Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldpaint Posted April 20, 2008 Posted April 20, 2008 After reading about Realtemp at http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?p=2809778 it seems Unclewebb, the creator of Realtemp, has done a lot of research that he documents at the site. Some are saying that this is the most accurate monitor for the 45nm processors. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kandoo Posted April 20, 2008 Posted April 20, 2008 After reading about Realtemp at http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?p=2809778it seems Unclewebb, the creator of Realtemp, has done a lot of research that he documents at the site. Some are saying that this is the most accurate monitor for the 45nm processors. yes paint that is what i use, Also the Asus pc probe II that came with my mobo software is showing the same readings as Realtemp. Core temp is way off and my cpu is not supported with TAT (i could not find a update or newer version of TAT). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingfisher Posted April 21, 2008 Posted April 21, 2008 actually what you want to do is trust the program that gives you the lowest temps, that one has to be correct. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
soundx98 Posted April 21, 2008 Posted April 21, 2008 I use RealTemp for both my E8400 and 3110 CPU Temps. Can't beat Everest for delivering all the rest of the information. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wevsspot Posted April 21, 2008 Posted April 21, 2008 actually what you want to do is trust the program that gives you the lowest temps, that one has to be correct. You are being silly right KF? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wevsspot Posted April 21, 2008 Posted April 21, 2008 actually what you want to do is trust the program that gives you the lowest temps, that one has to be correct. I'm hoping so. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingfisher Posted April 21, 2008 Posted April 21, 2008 well, I wish that to be true, but you are right Wevs, I was being tongue in cheek. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldpaint Posted April 21, 2008 Posted April 21, 2008 Originally I said that my idle and load temps were both 10C higher with Coretemp. After double checking the results between realtemp and coretemp I found that my load temps were just slightly less on Realtemp while my idle temps were 10C less. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldpaint Posted April 21, 2008 Posted April 21, 2008 actually what you want to do is trust the program that gives you the lowest temps, that one has to be correct. Yeah, it's a feel good thing Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now