Thraxz Posted October 13, 2006 Posted October 13, 2006 http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,2010879,00.asp They have a fear run there if you want to include it. Eh... who cares. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharmedLover84 Posted October 13, 2006 Posted October 13, 2006 Okay, I'm gonna update all of y'alls entries in to the system as soon as I finish reinstalling all my Windows crap from my processor swap out frying both of my windows installs LOL So gimme a day or two and I'll have everything updated along with (hopefully) my Opty's first entry on the chart Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharmedLover84 Posted October 16, 2006 Posted October 16, 2006 spec on the sig.... dunno if vsync on or off, but its max max by default. LCD here. oh, and its FEAR 1.00 too.. too lazy to update... That is DEFINITELY with VSync off. No monitor I know of has a refresh rate of 222Hz at 1024x768 LOL Nice run though, 'specially for a 7900GT, even if it is a KO Chart has been updated, sorry it took so long guys, just now got this biatch of an Opty stable at a speed I like lol see siggy for details. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thraxz Posted October 16, 2006 Posted October 16, 2006 Processor at 3033MHz mem at 472MHz BTW.... my last run was done with the mem at 466 not 490. I need to rectify that all in my sig eventually. There you go, Charmed, 30MHz= 1 fps... so the diff between 3.0 and 2.9 is about 3fps at 10x7 in fear. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharmedLover84 Posted October 16, 2006 Posted October 16, 2006 lol, yeah, maybe at that resolution. I'm running SLI remember? Every single MHz boost both CPU and video performance a lot, just the difference between 2.9 and 2.93 with my FX-60 was noticable because it allowed for the video cards to get more from the processor at once. Matter o' fact I think my AM3 Graphics Score went up by 1K just from 30MHz. And like I said, while it will be nice if I can continue to increase performance AND speed on the CPU, I just want 3GHz. lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharmedLover84 Posted October 16, 2006 Posted October 16, 2006 Processor at 3033MHz mem at 472MHz BTW.... my last run was done with the mem at 466 not 490. I need to rectify that all in my sig eventually. There you go, Charmed, 30MHz= 1 fps... so the diff between 3.0 and 2.9 is about 3fps at 10x7 in fear. And I would like to point out that your minimum actually went down. In my experience with FEAR, if you don't get at least 50 (which yer doing) as a minimum in the test, you'll be in deep crap in the game because the highest the graphics goes to in the test ain't JACK compared to in game... I'll have to find this old screen capture I have from back when I had an Opty at 2.65GHz and 2 7800GTX 512MBs, will give you an idea of just how much tougher the game is than the test, although the test is no easy feat, as some of our comrades are finding out (Poor OCNewbie LOL) ADDED BY EDIT: Feast your eyes on what once was considered godly power (Back when I first got my SLI of 7800GTX 512MBs, they were basically the best you could possibly get at the time, although my processor running at 2.56GHz 24/7 wasn't exactly the best) This is at Maximum/Maximum, 1600x1200, in game: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thraxz Posted October 16, 2006 Posted October 16, 2006 I bet you can run that test 10 times and get 4 different minimums. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharmedLover84 Posted October 16, 2006 Posted October 16, 2006 Wouldn't be so sure. The test (I'm fairly sure) is consistant in it's graphical content... the game isn't. LOL Either way, just sayin', there's a reason I think this is a great way to give your computer a real world test, cuz it is perdy intense. Wish Oblivion had an in-game benchmark. Would make it a lot easier for some people to set their stuff I'd bet. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thraxz Posted October 16, 2006 Posted October 16, 2006 Just ran it six times got 51/54/52 and multiples of those scores. Give enough tries I guarentee to see 50 53 and 55 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharmedLover84 Posted October 16, 2006 Posted October 16, 2006 ::smirks:: one might say that means the hardware varies more so than the test :: ducks:: lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thraxz Posted October 16, 2006 Posted October 16, 2006 I can imagine my minimum was 50 everytime but because of the sampling rates of the FPS monitor in the test it usuallyonly sees on either side of a super sharp spike down to 50. If it hits the tip... 50 if it hits around the sides 51-55. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
n_w95482 Posted October 16, 2006 Posted October 16, 2006 I never thought of that. Either that or some background process doing something minor for a really small amount of time, clock speeds varying, etc. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now