tasr Posted October 2, 2006 Posted October 2, 2006 I only know of two. A 89W and 110W. EDIT AM2 socket has a 65W http://www.amdcompare.com/us-en/desktop/de...n=ADO4400IAA6CS Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonheart 69 Posted October 3, 2006 Posted October 3, 2006 @Abducted I have exactly the same stepping and my CPU is at stock stable over 19 hour´s Dual Prime. I give 1,5 VCore and the CPU don´t run with 2500MHz It's just a bad batch I think Now i will buy a X2 4400+ 0610 DPMW in the 110W Version, and i hope this CPU goes more better Sorry for the English Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
h_Us3r Posted October 3, 2006 Posted October 3, 2006 @Abducted I have exactly the same stepping and my CPU is at stock stable over 19 hour´s Dual Prime. I give 1,5 VCore and the CPU don´t run with 2500MHz It's just a bad batch I think Now i will buy a X2 4400+ 0610 DPMW in the 110W Version, and i hope this CPU goes more better Sorry for the English Max is 2.73 on air running 1.45(VID STARTUP) x 104%(VID SPECIAL)although I am positive she can do 2.8 on water...soon...very soon... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
motopen1s Posted November 5, 2006 Posted November 5, 2006 Hey guys, I have a question for you... I finally started to overclocking my rig after half a year having it (just changed 'fsb' to 218 straight away though). So, here is what I have now: running memory at 2.5-3-2-6 1T (1:1) @2.8v., I've managed to do 237fsb (x11), but SP2004 would fail in 7 hours with 1.45vcore. When I raised the vcore to 1.47 - it was stable for more then 24 hours SP2004, but then it failed. Here is the screen: http://img165.imageshack.us/my.php?image=stresstest1ak3.jpg. Now I am running @235fsb (2585mHz) and keeping the vcore to the same 1.47v. First question is: if the SP2004 fails even after 30 hours - the pc is not stable, right? ... Should I try to raise my vcore to 1.5v and try running it at fsb237 (or even 240?)? What concerns me is the temperature, since Smartguardian didnt report anything higher then 39°C, but Everest2006 has some separate temps for each core, which actually rose till 51°C max. I would like to ran the cpu at full 2.6 and the memory at 1:1, with 2.5-3-2-6 preferably (and seems like there is no problem for it to do so). I am planing to run the system close to 24/7... You can look at my signiture for the specs I am @ now and all the other hardware used... Thanks in advance ___________________ DFI Lanparty nF4 SLI-DR AMD X2 4400+ (Rev. JH-E6, 235x11=2585, 1.47v) Thermalright SI-120 + AeroCool XtremeTurbine 2Gb Corsair CMX1024-3500LLPRO @2.5-3-2-6 1T 1.8v EVGA 7900gt (Manuf.OC @550&1580, ForceWare 91.31) Creative X-FI WD Raptor 150 (primary) & 320gb WD Asus CB-5216A & Asus DRW-1608P2S Enermax Liberty 620 Gigabyte 3d Aurora WinXP Pro SP2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
watsonte Posted November 5, 2006 Posted November 5, 2006 Hey guys, I have a question for you... I finally started to overclocking my rig after half a year having it (just changed 'fsb' to 218 straight away though). So, here is what I have now: running memory at 2.5-3-2-6 1T (1:1) @2.8v., I've managed to do 237fsb (x11), but SP2004 would fail in 7 hours with 1.45vcore. When I raised the vcore to 1.47 - it was stable for more then 24 hours SP2004, but then it failed. Here is the screen: http://img165.imageshack.us/my.php?image=stresstest1ak3.jpg. Now I am running @235fsb (2585mHz) and keeping the vcore to the same 1.47v. First question is: if the SP2004 fails even after 30 hours - the pc is not stable, right? ... Should I try to raise my vcore to 1.5v and try running it at fsb237 (or even 240?)? What concerns me is the temperature, since Smartguardian didnt report anything higher then 39°C, but Everest2006 has some separate temps for each core, which actually rose till 51°C max. I would like to ran the cpu at full 2.6 and the memory at 1:1, with 2.5-3-2-6 preferably (and seems like there is no problem for it to do so). I am planing to run the system close to 24/7... You can look at my signiture for the specs I am @ now and all the other hardware used... Thanks in advance In general for stability if you are Prime95 stable, and I guess SP2004 would work as well, for atleast 8hrs, you are stable enough for an OCDB entry... Personally I like 10-12hrs and thats it...beyond that I dont really care much, as long as I can game with the overclock then I think I am okay...24hrs is the preference for others....I think your okay with your 24hr stable settings... Try some games out and see how they go...and maybe up the FSB and Vcore a little bit, but as long as your temps stay under 50C your okay... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
motopen1s Posted November 5, 2006 Posted November 5, 2006 well, thats the temperature is the main question. The thing is that Smartguardian shows one temp, when everest 2006 another. In fact, the difference is that everest has 3 cpu temp (CPU - which is generaly the lowest and then temps for each core induvidually). Here is what it shows when I pumped up the vcore to 1.5v (in bios) and have fsb of 237: - both utilities shows different temps (SP2004 CPU stress test is running to heat it up on max). According to Smartguardian - I am running fine... but Everest 2006 reports that 1st core reaches 54°C! (when CPU is @41°C) ... thats gets me confused. I am pretty sure that at 1.5vcore the cpu would manage to do even 240fsb (x11=2640)... but would the temps be still fine? ... Currently, running at 237fsb, 1.5vcore and 1.8vram - my cpu temps are 28°C both reported by everest and smartguardian, however CPU1 in everest shows to be 29°C, and CPU - 33°C... Please help me to get rid of this temperature confusion Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ae804 Posted November 8, 2006 Posted November 8, 2006 well, thats the temperature is the main question. The thing is that Smartguardian shows one temp, when everest 2006 another. In fact, the difference is that everest has 3 cpu temp (CPU - which is generaly the lowest and then temps for each core induvidually). Here is what it shows when I pumped up the vcore to 1.5v (in bios) and have fsb of 237: - both utilities shows different temps (SP2004 CPU stress test is running to heat it up on max). According to Smartguardian - I am running fine... but Everest 2006 reports that 1st core reaches 54°C! (when CPU is @41°C) ... thats gets me confused. I am pretty sure that at 1.5vcore the cpu would manage to do even 240fsb (x11=2640)... but would the temps be still fine? ... Currently, running at 237fsb, 1.5vcore and 1.8vram - my cpu temps are 28°C both reported by everest and smartguardian, however CPU1 in everest shows to be 29°C, and CPU - 33°C... Please help me to get rid of this temperature confusion Same problem here.... I only run 40C at Vcore of 1.6, but my "Core" temp reads high 50's and even into the 60's..... i don't think that's right! Any help from someone would be appreciated. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaisyo Posted November 8, 2006 Posted November 8, 2006 different programs tend to give off different reading, i use mbm5 , core temp and smart guardian .... i tend to trust mbm5 readings , since its a balance of the other readings .,, kinda like a middle ground Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now