adidassler Posted May 17, 2006 Posted May 17, 2006 Kewl!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellasvagabond Posted May 17, 2006 Posted May 17, 2006 Guys is 1.4 Volt enough or too much for an 3800x2 running at 2500mhz ? Also should i have Startup Value also at 1.4V or at Auto and whats the best setting for the CPU VID Special Control ? Currently i have 1.4v and 104% but im asking for your opinions. Also has anyone tried the Odd Dividor option in the Bios ? Should i Enable it or leave it Disabled ? I almost forgot to ask what settings you have under Dram Responce Time. I have it Fast , should i make it Faster ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eg660 Posted May 26, 2006 Posted May 26, 2006 Hey guys I jsut got my new set of G.skill 2 gb....First I would like to know how to start to play with the setting...because I cant go past 250 FSB...and I know I need to play around the mem timings? thanks in advance. :nod: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellasvagabond Posted May 26, 2006 Posted May 26, 2006 You have already a great overclock. You could put higher timings : 3-5-5-10 to get up to 280 but for what ? In our days the GPU matters far more than the CPUs mhz. Specifically i got 3fps increase in most games going from 2000 to 2500mhz. Not worth it if you ask me. Put your ram at 3-4-4-7-1T and leave it like that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HITandRUN Posted May 27, 2006 Posted May 27, 2006 Nah, we are here to overclock :shake: and not to ran a stock set up! Why don’t you browser through the entire post and try all the different settings and timings people use! I’m sure you will find something you can use! BTW the most people can’t pass 270 MHz! Good luck! :nod: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldGuy Posted May 28, 2006 Posted May 28, 2006 Man oh man...woke up this morning, crossed my fingers and turned on my monitor to be greeted with Prime95 still running...Cool. Use the john, brush the teeth and ker-slammage to my buzz of 3 minutes prior. Failure after 10 hours and 48 minutes Glad I didin't stop it cuz I was gonna spend a little time trying to tighten up my settings at 264. Oh well, I know I'm close...this HZ stuff is a pain the arse Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest burningrave101 Posted May 29, 2006 Posted May 29, 2006 Man oh man...woke up this morning, crossed my fingers and turned on my monitor to be greeted with Prime95 still running...Cool. Use the john, brush the teeth and ker-slammage to my buzz of 3 minutes prior. Failure after 10 hours and 48 minutes Glad I didin't stop it cuz I was gonna spend a little time trying to tighten up my settings at 264. Oh well, I know I'm close...this HZ stuff is a pain the arse Try running Windows Memtest. It will be a lot faster then Prime95 and do a better job of testing the memory. Let two iterations run to at least 1,000%+. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LurksAtDFI_St Posted May 29, 2006 Posted May 29, 2006 As I had promised in an earlier post, here are my settings for running at lower RAM mhz with tighter timings. Increased both LDT and Chipset V from my previous post to complete 3DM '01. It passes the other BM's with the LDT @ 1.2V and Chipset @ 1.59V set in the BIOS. Who: LurksAtDFI_St Motherboard: DFI LanParty UT SLI-DR Expert CPU: AMD Opteron 148 (CABNE 0528) RAM: 2x1GB G.Skill HZ PC4000 (Build 0604) SPD: 250Mhz @ 3-5-5-10 Real Ram Mhz: 267 BIOS Version: 12/07/05 FSB Bus Freq: 267 LDT/FSB Freq: 3 CPU/FSB Freq Ratio: 11 PCI-Express Freq: 100 CPU VID StartUp Value: 1.450V CPU VID Control: 1.450V CPU VID Special Control: Auto LDT Voltage Control: 1.4V Chipset Voltage Control: 1.72V DRAM Voltage Control: 2.6V Dram Freq Set (MHz): 200 (1:1) Command Per Clock (CPC): Enabled CAS Latency Control (tCL): 3 RAS# to CAS# Delay (tRCD): 4 Min RAS# Active timing (tRAS): 7 Row Precharge timing (tRP): 3 Row Cycle time (tRC): 7 Row Refresh Cycle time (tRFC): 13 Row to Row Delay (tRRD): 2 Write Recovery time (tWR): 2 Write to Read Delay (tWTR): 2 Read to Write Delay (tRTW): 3 Refresh Period (tREF): 3684 Write CAS# Latency (tWCL): 1 DRAM Bank Interleave: Enabled DQS Skew Control: Disabled DQS Skew Value: 0 DRAM Drive Strength: Level3 DRAM Data Drive Strength: Auto Max Async Latency: 8 Nano Seconds <--- Set to 7 @ 265mhz DRAM Response time: Fastest Read Preamble time: 5 Nano Seconds Idle Cycle Limit: 16 Cycles Dynamic Counter: Disabled R/W Queue Bypass: 8x Bypass Max: 4x 32 byte Granulation: Disabled (4 bursts) 3DM01, CPU-Zv1.33.1, Everest2.20.405, MBM5: A64Tweakerv0.60beta, CPU-Zv1.33.1, 32M-SuperPImod1.4: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gengstapo Posted May 30, 2006 Posted May 30, 2006 newbie askin' here. since the eXpert genie look alike ultra-d, can i apply it(genie setting) to my ultra-d?? thanks Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eg660 Posted May 30, 2006 Posted May 30, 2006 hellasvagabond You have already a great overclock. You could put higher timings : 3-5-5-10 to get up to 280 but for what ? In our days the GPU matters far more than the CPUs mhz. Specifically i got 3fps increase in most games going from 2000 to 2500mhz. Not worth it if you ask me. Put your ram at 3-4-4-7-1T and leave it like that. I dont think I have a great overclock. Because I see some people having 2600 or 2700. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gengstapo Posted May 30, 2006 Posted May 30, 2006 after reading each pages here, can assume that most UCCC chippy able to do less 300HTT but can do more than 275HTT Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redbeaver Posted May 30, 2006 Posted May 30, 2006 my Gold XTC cant pass 260Mz @3-4-4-8 2T - 2.8V.... 3.2V didnt help, 3-5-5-8, 4-5-5-8, 4-4-4-8, anythin u can imagine... didnt help. bah. oh well. its all good wit my CPU maxed out at 311, and using the next lower multi from 200 is 166, that gives me 258..w00t ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now