Clint Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 same chips but different PCB will produce different results will it not? Otherwise everyone would be buying up ADATA UCCC chips, correct? Ok, so you suggesting I remove it then? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evancold Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 Don't get me wrong, all I am trying to say is that they may not perform the same as the G Skill HZ sticks. Was just wondering if that would defeat the purpose of this thread or not, but that is not my decision. But very nice clock you have on those sticks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clint Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 No prob ..lets just see what will come out of it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burky Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 my sticks are running memtest fine at default settings at 250mhz, but they won't do 260mhz even if I go to 2.8v from 2.6v. Please give me some ideas here. This is hindering my oc. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blick Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 Anyway, I can't get memtest to pass more than 20%, even when I up the voltage to 2.8V, and that sucks. Burky try at 2.5v, this UCCC love low voltage not high. These are my settings: FSB Bus Frequency - 260 LDT/FSB Frequency Ratio - AUTO CPU/FSB Frequency Ratio - AUTO PCI eXpress Frequency - 100Mhz CPU VID StartUp Value - 1.450v CPU VID Control - 1.450v CPU VID Special Control - Above VID * 110% LDT Voltage Control - 1.20v Chip Set Voltage Control - 1.50v DRAM Voltage Control - 2.50v DRAM Frequency Set - 200=RAM/FSB:01/1 Command Per Clock (CPC) - Enable CAS Latency Control (Tcl) - 3.0 RAS# to CAS# delay (Trcd) - 04 Bus Clocks Min RAS# active time (Tras) - 07 Bus Clocks Row precharge time (Trp) - 04 Bus Clocks Row Cycle time (Trc) - 07 Bus Clocks Row refresh cyc time (Trfc) - 13 Bus Clocks Row to Row delay (Trrd) - 02 Bus Clocks Write recovery time (Twr) - 02 Bus Clocks Write to Read delay (Twtr) - 01 Bus Clocks Read to Write delay (Trwt) - 03 Bus Clocks Refresh Period (Tref) - 3684 Cycles Write CAS Latency (Twcl) - 1 clk DRAM Bank Interleave - Enabled DQS Skew Control - Auto DQS Skew Value - 0 DRAM Drive Strength - Auto DRAM Data Drive Strength - Auto Max Async Latency - 7.0 Nano Seconds DRAM Response Time - Normal Read Preamble Time - 5.0 Nano Seconds IdleCycle Limit - 256 Cycles Dynamic Counter - Enable R/W Queue Bypass - 16 x Bypass Max - 07 x 32 Byte Granularity - Disable(4 Bursts) Stop at 260 because my 3200+ Venice hit the wall so no point to struggle... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest FZ1 Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 updated table/picture on 02/09/2006 10.35 am (eastern). @FZ1: 9x317 / 11 = 259 mhz not 269. 11 comes from: 9x(6/5) = 10.8 >>> 11(other peoples "real ram mhz" calculated by using this formula.) Sorry, typo there Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burky Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 Thanks a lot Blick, same with my Venice too, so I'm happy if I can make 260 stable though I'm trying to push 2.7ghz as soon as I get my ram sorted. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tdntx Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 Stop at 260 because my 3200+ Venice hit the wall so no point to struggle... Same here. My X2 can run stable 250x11 or 270x10 but only with 1.6v vcore. I don't feel comfortable running 24/7 with that high vcore on air considering the questionable CPU temp reading (Idle 22C Dual Prime 36C Ambient Room 22C). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blick Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 Thanks a lot Blick, same with my Venice too, so I'm happy if I can make 260 stable though I'm trying to push 2.7ghz as soon as I get my ram sorted. good luck! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burky Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 Just out of curiousity, is there a particular BIOS best for these sticks here? I'm using OCZ Tony's one now, but in terms of performance between the 2nd and 3rd 6/23 BIOs I can't notice any difference. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blick Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 I've read somewhere that 623-1 is good, but I didn't try other BIOSes so I can't tell you for sure Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burky Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 Ok. well it failed after 7% on the settings you have blick, so I'm not sure where to go from here. Shall I try the 623-1 BIOS instead do you think? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now