Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

G.Skill HZ/Any other UCCC (2x1024) 260+ please post here


  • Please log in to reply
556 replies to this topic

#13 saruman

saruman

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 72 posts

Posted 08 February 2006 - 02:32 PM

Prime95 stable 297HTT on 180divider

http://img345.images...me95stable7.jpg

#14 ooztuncer

ooztuncer

    Total Nerd

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2712 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, ME

Posted 08 February 2006 - 02:39 PM

@ saruman: good job - can you please write your bios settings like in post #8 or 12.

#15 Burky

Burky

    Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 662 posts

Posted 08 February 2006 - 03:25 PM

Ultra-D 0704-3
FSB - 260
LDT - Auto
CPU/FSB Ratio - x10
Vcore - 1.45 x 110%
LDTv - 1.20
CHPv - 1.50
vDIMM - 2.8

DRAM Frequency Set - 200 (DRAM/FSB:1/1)
Command Per Clock (CPC) - Auto
CAS Latency Control (Tcl) - 3.0
RAS# to CAS# delay (Trcd) - 04 Bus Clocks
Min RAS# active time (Tras) - 06 Bus Clocks
Row precharge time (Trp) - 03 Bus Clocks
Row Cycle time (Trc) - 07 Bus Clocks
Row refresh cyc time (Trfc) - 13 Bus Clocks
Row to Row delay (Trrd) - 02 Bus Clocks
Write recovery time (Twr) - 02 Bus Clocks
Write to Read delay (Twtr) - 02 Bus Clocks
Read to Write delay (Trwt) - 02 Bus Clocks
Refresh Period (Tref) - 3124 Cycles (100Mhz 1.95us)
Write CAS Latency (Twcl) - 01
DRAM Bank Interleave - Enabled

DQS Skew Control - Auto
DQS Skew Value - 0
DRAM Drive Strength - Level 7
DRAM Data Drive Strength - Level 3
Max Async Latency - 7.0ns
DRAM Response Time - Normal
Read Preamble Time - 5.0ns
IdleCycle Limit - 16 Cycles
Dynamic Counter - Enable
R/W Queue Bypass - 8 x
Bypass Max - 04 x
32 Byte Granularity - Disable(4 Bursts)

I would just like to state that my memory isn't yet fully memtested yet, but so far runs ok. However I cannot get 270mhz on3-4-4-8 even close to stable which is a shame, as I see other people here getting 290 or 300 with them which would be awesome to pull off.
Guess I just got a bad batch maybe. Still If I can get 260mhz with tighter timings I guess it's ok.

#16 saruman

saruman

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 72 posts

Posted 08 February 2006 - 05:28 PM

@ saruman: good job - can you please write your bios settings like in post #8 or 12.



FSB - 297
LDT - x3
CPU/FSB Ratio - x9
Vcore - 1.550
LDTv - 1.40
CHPv - 1.72
vDIMM - 2.8

DRAM Frequency Set - 180 (DRAM/FSB:9/10)
Command Per Clock (CPC) - Enable
CAS Latency Control (Tcl) - 3.0
RAS# to CAS# delay (Trcd) - 04 Bus Clocks
Min RAS# active time (Tras) - 08 Bus Clocks
Row precharge time (Trp) - 03 Bus Clocks
Row Cycle time (Trc) - 09 Bus Clocks
Row refresh cyc time (Trfc) - 19 Bus Clocks
Row to Row delay (Trrd) - 02 Bus Clocks
Write recovery time (Twr) - 03 Bus Clocks
Write to Read delay (Twtr) - 02 Bus Clocks
Read to Write delay (Trwt) - 03 Bus Clocks
Refresh Period (Tref) - auto
Write CAS Latency (Twcl) - auto
DRAM Bank Interleave - Enabled

DQS Skew Control - auto
DQS Skew Value - 0
DRAM Drive Strength - auto
DRAM Data Drive Strength - auto
Max Async Latency - auto
DRAM Response Time - Normal
Read Preamble Time - auto
IdleCycle Limit - 256 Cycles
Dynamic Counter - Enable
R/W Queue Bypass - 16 x
Bypass Max - 07 x
32 Byte Granularity - Disable(4 Bursts)


http://img403.images...core12memor.jpg 3dmark01

http://img435.images...core12memor.jpg 3dmark03

http://img435.images...ore12memor1.jpg 3dmark05

http://img527.images...ore12memor1.jpg 3dmarl06

http://img527.images...ore12memor2.jpg pcmarl05

http://img527.images...me95stable3.jpg prime95 stable 8+ hours

#17 lowsidr

lowsidr

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 127 posts

Posted 08 February 2006 - 05:44 PM

Ooz....Can't thank you enough!

I'm a noob that is just totally overwhelmed. My mind is getting fried! The settings graph really helps ALOT....pictures do paint a thousand words. I continue to understand more as time goes by, but because i'm learning, I really really appreciate the graph as a referance. Thanks for the help. Cudo's man!

#18 mlinz23

mlinz23

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 53 posts

Posted 08 February 2006 - 09:19 PM

Mine don't go past 260, but I haven't played with them much yet..just reserving a spot here ;)

saruman - Your system is similar to mine different is my memory is at 260mhz 1:1 and your like 50mhz faster CPU wise, but your getting maybe 200mips more than I am....just a question here Your getting 4671 in 3dmark06 and I only get like 4100...wtf is up there? :) I was kind of pissed it was that low, when a buddy of mine with the same system with a GTX score liked 800 more marks than me...also if you have a compare URL i'd like to view it...my 05 score is way below yours too so i dun know.

#19 ooztuncer

ooztuncer

    Total Nerd

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2712 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, ME

Posted 09 February 2006 - 07:44 AM

updated table/picture on 02/09/2006 10.35 am (eastern).

Added: fz1, tdntx, burky, saruman, and stone cold jimi. Thank you all...

@FZ1: 9x317 / 11 = 259 mhz not 269. 11 comes from: 9x(6/5) = 10.8 >>> 11(other peoples "real ram mhz" calculated by using this formula.)

@burky: just some heads-up, u are using 2t command rate - why not 1t (if possible) by enabling CPC.

@saruman: ur ram speed is interesting given that most of the timing set to auto :)

#20 Clint

Clint

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 130 posts

Posted 09 February 2006 - 09:53 AM

Taken out..

#21 Burky

Burky

    Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 662 posts

Posted 09 February 2006 - 10:00 AM

I have a problem, and have started over with my ram

My problem; I can't get my sticks stable at all at 260mhz.
I just loaded the optimized settings (thanks for the idea clint) from my BIOS, so they are at default, then I clocked them up to 260mhz on a 1/1 divider, but changed no other settings, assuming the other settings are fairly loose, though I'm running at 1T

Anyway, I can't get memtest to pass more than 20%, even when I up the voltage to 2.8V, and that sucks. I don't want to have to use a divider to be able to pull of 2.6ghz on my rig.

Any ideas? Have I just got a bad batch or what?
I see some of you guys hitting 290-300 here...

#22 Evancold

Evancold

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 162 posts

Posted 09 February 2006 - 10:05 AM

Hey Clint, those are not G Skill sticks are they?

#23 Clint

Clint

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 130 posts

Posted 09 February 2006 - 10:11 AM

Hey Clint, those are not G Skill sticks are they?


Nope, but are the same stuff under the hood...I would change title of thread to include Samsung UCCC (the name of the actual chip).

There are also Mushkins and OCZ's out there using the same chip, we could share this thread for better statistics ;)

#24 Evancold

Evancold

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 162 posts

Posted 09 February 2006 - 10:19 AM

same chips but different PCB will produce different results will it not? Otherwise everyone would be buying up ADATA UCCC chips, correct?