Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
ooztuncer

G.Skill HZ/Any other UCCC (2x1024) 260+ please post here

Recommended Posts

Ultra-D 0704-3

FSB - 260

LDT - Auto

CPU/FSB Ratio - x10

Vcore - 1.45 x 110%

LDTv - 1.20

CHPv - 1.50

vDIMM - 2.8

 

DRAM Frequency Set - 200 (DRAM/FSB:1/1)

Command Per Clock (CPC) - Auto

CAS Latency Control (Tcl) - 3.0

RAS# to CAS# delay (Trcd) - 04 Bus Clocks

Min RAS# active time (Tras) - 06 Bus Clocks

Row precharge time (Trp) - 03 Bus Clocks

Row Cycle time (Trc) - 07 Bus Clocks

Row refresh cyc time (Trfc) - 13 Bus Clocks

Row to Row delay (Trrd) - 02 Bus Clocks

Write recovery time (Twr) - 02 Bus Clocks

Write to Read delay (Twtr) - 02 Bus Clocks

Read to Write delay (Trwt) - 02 Bus Clocks

Refresh Period (Tref) - 3124 Cycles (100Mhz 1.95us)

Write CAS Latency (Twcl) - 01

DRAM Bank Interleave - Enabled

 

DQS Skew Control - Auto

DQS Skew Value - 0

DRAM Drive Strength - Level 7

DRAM Data Drive Strength - Level 3

Max Async Latency - 7.0ns

DRAM Response Time - Normal

Read Preamble Time - 5.0ns

IdleCycle Limit - 16 Cycles

Dynamic Counter - Enable

R/W Queue Bypass - 8 x

Bypass Max - 04 x

32 Byte Granularity - Disable(4 Bursts)

 

I would just like to state that my memory isn't yet fully memtested yet, but so far runs ok. However I cannot get 270mhz on3-4-4-8 even close to stable which is a shame, as I see other people here getting 290 or 300 with them which would be awesome to pull off.

Guess I just got a bad batch maybe. Still If I can get 260mhz with tighter timings I guess it's ok.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
@ saruman: good job - can you please write your bios settings like in post #8 or 12.

 

 

FSB - 297

LDT - x3

CPU/FSB Ratio - x9

Vcore - 1.550

LDTv - 1.40

CHPv - 1.72

vDIMM - 2.8

 

DRAM Frequency Set - 180 (DRAM/FSB:9/10)

Command Per Clock (CPC) - Enable

CAS Latency Control (Tcl) - 3.0

RAS# to CAS# delay (Trcd) - 04 Bus Clocks

Min RAS# active time (Tras) - 08 Bus Clocks

Row precharge time (Trp) - 03 Bus Clocks

Row Cycle time (Trc) - 09 Bus Clocks

Row refresh cyc time (Trfc) - 19 Bus Clocks

Row to Row delay (Trrd) - 02 Bus Clocks

Write recovery time (Twr) - 03 Bus Clocks

Write to Read delay (Twtr) - 02 Bus Clocks

Read to Write delay (Trwt) - 03 Bus Clocks

Refresh Period (Tref) - auto

Write CAS Latency (Twcl) - auto

DRAM Bank Interleave - Enabled

 

DQS Skew Control - auto

DQS Skew Value - 0

DRAM Drive Strength - auto

DRAM Data Drive Strength - auto

Max Async Latency - auto

DRAM Response Time - Normal

Read Preamble Time - auto

IdleCycle Limit - 256 Cycles

Dynamic Counter - Enable

R/W Queue Bypass - 16 x

Bypass Max - 07 x

32 Byte Granularity - Disable(4 Bursts)

 

 

http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/7826/29...core12memor.jpg 3dmark01

 

http://img435.imageshack.us/img435/7826/29...core12memor.jpg 3dmark03

 

http://img435.imageshack.us/img435/4700/29...ore12memor1.jpg 3dmark05

 

http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/4700/29...ore12memor1.jpg 3dmarl06

 

http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/3332/29...ore12memor2.jpg pcmarl05

 

http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/1926/29...me95stable3.jpg prime95 stable 8+ hours

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ooz....Can't thank you enough!

 

I'm a noob that is just totally overwhelmed. My mind is getting fried! The settings graph really helps ALOT....pictures do paint a thousand words. I continue to understand more as time goes by, but because i'm learning, I really really appreciate the graph as a referance. Thanks for the help. Cudo's man!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mine don't go past 260, but I haven't played with them much yet..just reserving a spot here ;)

 

saruman - Your system is similar to mine different is my memory is at 260mhz 1:1 and your like 50mhz faster CPU wise, but your getting maybe 200mips more than I am....just a question here Your getting 4671 in 3dmark06 and I only get like 4100...wtf is up there? :) I was kind of pissed it was that low, when a buddy of mine with the same system with a GTX score liked 800 more marks than me...also if you have a compare URL i'd like to view it...my 05 score is way below yours too so i dun know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

updated table/picture on 02/09/2006 10.35 am (eastern).

 

Added: fz1, tdntx, burky, saruman, and stone cold jimi. Thank you all...

 

@FZ1: 9x317 / 11 = 259 mhz not 269. 11 comes from: 9x(6/5) = 10.8 >>> 11(other peoples "real ram mhz" calculated by using this formula.)

 

@burky: just some heads-up, u are using 2t command rate - why not 1t (if possible) by enabling CPC.

 

@saruman: ur ram speed is interesting given that most of the timing set to auto :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a problem, and have started over with my ram

 

My problem; I can't get my sticks stable at all at 260mhz.

I just loaded the optimized settings (thanks for the idea clint) from my BIOS, so they are at default, then I clocked them up to 260mhz on a 1/1 divider, but changed no other settings, assuming the other settings are fairly loose, though I'm running at 1T

 

Anyway, I can't get memtest to pass more than 20%, even when I up the voltage to 2.8V, and that sucks. I don't want to have to use a divider to be able to pull of 2.6ghz on my rig.

 

Any ideas? Have I just got a bad batch or what?

I see some of you guys hitting 290-300 here...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey Clint, those are not G Skill sticks are they?

 

Nope, but are the same stuff under the hood...I would change title of thread to include Samsung UCCC (the name of the actual chip).

 

There are also Mushkins and OCZ's out there using the same chip, we could share this thread for better statistics ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×