Burky Posted February 2, 2006 Posted February 2, 2006 So I have my new ram, and I'm very impressed with the increased benchmarks, but now has been my first time overclocking ram and I came to a sad realisaton. Due to the ceiling function on the bottom of the equation: Core speed / ] multi x ratio [ This means that the number on the bottom must be integral. This leaves my only two choices for my ram speed as either 2650/9 = 294mhz (9:10 divider) or 2650/10 = 265mhz (1:1) Now my cpu is stuck fast at 2.655ghz, to get to 2.7ghz require more than 0.05v more which just isn't worth it in my book. So therefore I cannot get my ram any higher. So this leaves me with the choice either 294 or 265. I tried 294, and it just won't boot, and I went up to 2.8v and it still wouldn't. So I have settled for 265mhz, but this seems a little lower than I would like them to be. Iwas hoping for like 280mhz like I hear other people have achieved. Is the best thing I can do now just to compensate for the slower than desired sspeed by tightening up the timings? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reimannian Posted February 2, 2006 Posted February 2, 2006 Have you read the sticky on loose/tight timings/dividers? It doesn't really matter much. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burky Posted February 2, 2006 Posted February 2, 2006 Yeh that's why I was wanting to compensate for the loss of memory. Still I hear that running a 1:1 divider is best of all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reimannian Posted February 3, 2006 Posted February 3, 2006 Sure it's the best, but the figures show it's insignificant in the real world. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madu Posted February 3, 2006 Posted February 3, 2006 WHy dont you raise the fsb and then put the cpu on a lower multi.. Just curios, shouldnt the 9/10 divider bring down the mem freq? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest FZ1 Posted February 3, 2006 Posted February 3, 2006 SThis means that the number on the bottom must be integral. This leaves my only two choices for my ram speed as either 2650/9 = 294mhz (9:10 divider) or 2650/10 = 265mhz (1:1) Wait a sec, I think you have something wrong here. If you are running 9x295 you are hitting 2655Mhz on your CPU. With a RAM divider of 9:10 (=1.11111) your RAM speed would be 265.5 because: 2655/ 9(1.1111) = 2655/10 (round up!) = 265.5 OK, now that I look at this I guess you have your setup incorrectly entered...I think you meant to type: 2650/9 = 294mhz (1:1) or 2650/10 = 265mhz (9:10 divider) If so, stick with the 265! Those Gskills won't all hit near 300 - most find the sweet spot between 265-275. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.