Jump to content

tight timings? loose timings? dividers? 1T or 2T? 754 or 939? (read he


Recommended Posts

275x10=2750MHZ (cpu speed)

2750 (cpu speed) '/, 11 (180 divider) = 250MHZ "DDR500"

 

the 200 divider or 1:1 is always the CPU multiplyer (eg. 10 in the above case)

Each step down is an increase in "1" of this number. So the 180 divider is 10+1=11..And so on..... Get it?

 

Sorry,

Could you please clarify the '/, thing?

 

Do you mean.... 2750 (cpu speed) / 11 (180 divider) = 250 MHz

 

If yes, then assuming the next divider, which would be /12

 

2750 (cpu speed) / 12 (divider after 180... 166 ?) = 299.1667 MHz. Is this right?

 

Have i got it now :O

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Sorry '/. does equal /......(divided by)..

 

You do have it now except that next 166 divider is 12 not 11..

 

In the case we are looking at, here is how the dividers look....

200=10 <-(cpu multiplier)--275mhz

180=11--250mhz

166=12--229mhz

150=13--211mhz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2750 (cpu speed) / 11 (divider after 180... 166 ?) = 299.1667 MHz. Is this right?

 

I really dont know how you got these numbers, but I think you got it figured out now. Just be careful with the calculations...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  • 3 months later...

http://www.barrys-rigs-n-reviews.com/revie...em/pnymem_1.pdf

 

This is an interesting review (old by todays standards) of some PNY DDR 600 memory. What caught my eye about this review is the comparison between an Athlon64 at 2600 MHz with memory timings of 2-2-2-5 (low latency typical high priced overclockers ram) and 2.5-4-4-7 (average latency). Most of the benchmarks show a "gain" of :)

 

Enjoy,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...