robjulo Posted January 20, 2006 Posted January 20, 2006 Is there any signifcance to both cores failing prime at the exact same time (1hour and 12 minutes) with the exact same failure during the torture test. I had affinity set properly for each core so the CPU was being 100 percent utilized, I was using a memory size of 900M for each. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpeedEuphoria Posted January 20, 2006 Posted January 20, 2006 were you oc'ing? what was your speed and voltage? I run 2.4 all day at stock v prime stable x2 for 19hrs I know I need more v for 2.5( getting ready to circumsize the cpu and turn it up since core1 fails while core0 is good) well it could be your mem or psu crapping out at a certain point if you had a log of the voltages from mbm5 or some other program you could rule out that or you could try to up the cpu v to see if it was just the cpu(which would mean your cores are very similar in ability) run some other benches to test other things Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KimTjik Posted January 20, 2006 Posted January 20, 2006 Is there any signifcance to both cores failing prime at the exact same time (1hour and 12 minutes) with the exact same failure during the torture test. I had affinity set properly for each core so the CPU was being 100 percent utilized, I was using a memory size of 900M for each. In a way you could be pleased. Some guys do experience how one of the cores evidently being able to go really high, but the other one is holding back. I suppose that's more frustrating, than having both being equally good or bad (ok, hopefully not bad ). This sad assuming you're talking about an OC:ed system. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KimTjik Posted January 21, 2006 Posted January 21, 2006 One question: why do you set both cores to use so much memory? Maybe I'm a total n00bie to Prime, but for me it seems a bit too optimistic or over the top, and not very usefull. The basic setup I have for a torture test with a lot of stress to the memory takes up 766mb. I ask this not to critize, but I would like know. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laughing Man Posted January 21, 2006 Posted January 21, 2006 I think that's to much too at 900 each it would look like they start using the paging file... 700 should be good for each core. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robjulo Posted January 21, 2006 Posted January 21, 2006 Ok. I will lower the memory, I thought I was suppose to use take my total ram and divide by 2, so I did that and went with a little less. Rig is not overclocked. It is running stock speeds. I had it stable previously but was only using one instance of Prime. With two instances and affinity set, it is failing again. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robjulo Posted January 21, 2006 Posted January 21, 2006 I think that's to much too at 900 each it would look like they start using the paging file... 700 should be good for each core. Laughing Man - your rig is almost the exact same as mine. Are you stable and if so do you mind to give me your voltages and memory timings? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robjulo Posted January 21, 2006 Posted January 21, 2006 I'm a bit of a newbie at this and haven't built a rig in a long time. Could telling prime to use such a large memory chunk hence the page file cause prime to error or is that just wishful thinking? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KimTjik Posted January 21, 2006 Posted January 21, 2006 Excuse me if am asking the wrong question, you might have been over this already: if we forget about Prime for a moment, have you run Memtest thoroughly to make sure they're running smoothly? To confirm this would at least make the troubleshooting a bit easier. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lowboy Posted January 21, 2006 Posted January 21, 2006 just run again with 800mb may crap at same place may not, it is unusual for both fail at same time. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.