Rezag1000 Posted August 26, 2005 Posted August 26, 2005 http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=25730 http://www.gdhardware.com/events/idf/fall_2005/003.htm say what you will about the inq., but I have found there info to be mostly right Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry_Games Posted August 26, 2005 Posted August 26, 2005 i never listen to rumors and speculation (especially from Inquirer) i only go by what real users have in their hands, or what I have in my hands Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jadawin Posted August 26, 2005 Posted August 26, 2005 And I couldn't care less if it had 2 pipelines as long as it beats the GeForce 7800 GTX But I suspect that 16 pipelines are enough for that purpose even though the chip itself has more, but deactivated ones, so ATI can react to Nvidia reacting to ATI reacting to Nvidia reacting to.... :nod: Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rezag1000 Posted August 26, 2005 Posted August 26, 2005 yes, you guys all make good points. but, I have found rumors on the inq. to be well founded. They predicted Xbox 360 specs, 7800 GTX specs, and 7800 GT specs. Also, true they may be 16 SUPER-PIPES, but still having 8 less pipes is nothing to scoff at. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jadawin Posted August 27, 2005 Posted August 27, 2005 It's also said on the net that it may be clocked at 700 Mhz core... and that would be a huge speed advantage over the 24 pipe 7800 GTX, so 16 pipes at 700 Mhz could indeed be better than the 24 pipes at 430 Mhz for the Geforce. In fact, it could be a LOT faster. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jadawin Posted August 27, 2005 Posted August 27, 2005 Oh, and I may add that we have a downclocked R520 at work and I haven't tested it, but my 3D-programming colleague said it's faster than the 7800GTX. Downclocked and with beta drivers. But I can't confirm that. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaFrOuT Posted August 27, 2005 Posted August 27, 2005 i think nowdays are the days of nvidia only hope ATI wil be able to join the competetion soon again Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sea Shadow Posted August 27, 2005 Posted August 27, 2005 Oh, and I may add that we have a downclocked R520 at work and I haven't tested it, but my 3D-programming colleague said it's faster than the 7800GTX. Downclocked and with beta drivers. But I can't confirm that. Please enlighten me how you have gotten a hold of hardware that still isnt in the hands of reviewers, nor is it officially announced. And then please tell me your interpretation of the acronym NDA. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jadawin Posted August 27, 2005 Posted August 27, 2005 Oh, I didn't disclose anything specifically nor did I confirm anything, did I? It's all hearsay. Are you complaining to The Inquirer, too? And also *I* don't have that hardware, but if I wanted to, I could have a look within minutes. Has it's advantages to work for a games developer, I had an X800Pro in my hands LONG before any X800 was out. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
G.N.U.Fragman Posted August 28, 2005 Posted August 28, 2005 well the inq must be right sometimes with all the rumors they are spamming.......cant be trusted, but sometimes they are right......dont trust them on this one though. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rabbi Posted August 29, 2005 Posted August 29, 2005 personally, I've got nothing against speculations and rumours... reason im into overclocking is as much what WILL be available in the future as what i can use today in saying that though, i think the 16pipe 700-800Mhz claim sounds a bit pie-in-the-sky... in the new age of higher parallelism and lower power requirements it seems out of place Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jadawin Posted August 29, 2005 Posted August 29, 2005 Yes, but the higher parallelism isn't there because everybody wanted it, but because there was no other way to make huge improvements anymore otherwise. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.