red1776 Posted May 1, 2011 Posted May 1, 2011 wow, major resolution bottelneck. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nyt Posted May 1, 2011 Posted May 1, 2011 Nice Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattyamdfanboi Posted May 1, 2011 Posted May 1, 2011 if its a bottle neck.. how come nyt seems to score just fine??? i scored 2.2k btw but at stock clocks.. ill up the clocks to 940 n see what it pulls on its own later.. bedtime for me now Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nyt Posted May 1, 2011 Posted May 1, 2011 Because Red suffers from a slower cpu and severe quadfire inefficiency Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cery25 Posted May 1, 2011 Posted May 1, 2011 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrewr05 Posted May 1, 2011 Posted May 1, 2011 UPDATED ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
red1776 Posted May 1, 2011 Posted May 1, 2011 (edited) Because Red suffers from a slower cpu and severe quadfire inefficiency you should see my numbers when It gets up to resolutions that...you know...actually matter. I guess it is a quadfire inefficiency at a tiny resolution like this, but then thats not what you use for 1280 x 720, like using stick of dynamite to loosen the lid on a pickle jar. It also has to do with the program running. 3DMark11 P is run @ 1280 x 720 and my score is close to yours Nyt.Think there is enough wide screen/multiple screen folks on here to start a 'high res gaming & benchmark' thread Nyt? http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/4502/metro2033veryhigh23.jpg ( Metro 2033 on very high settings) http://img816.imageshack.us/f/crysiswarhead5760.jpg/ (Crysis Warhead on all enthusiast settings) I'm thinking my quadfire is working just fine... if its a bottle neck.. how come nyt seems to score just fine??? i scored 2.2k btw but at stock clocks.. ill up the clocks to 940 n see what it pulls on its own later.. bedtime for me now @ Matt, It is most definitely a bottleneck at 1280 x 720, but it gets exponentially better as res goes up. and who plays at 1280x720? I have benched CF @ 2x, 3x, and 4x GPU's at large resolutions and the scaling is exceptional. I do think that a lot of it has to do with the last few sets of drivers from AMD. They seem to be finally addressing CF using more than two cards because it has gotten much better as of late. Edited May 1, 2011 by red1776 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bishop245 Posted May 1, 2011 Posted May 1, 2011 wont be near my desktop for a few more weeks but here is my 3+ year old sager laptop did with it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrewr05 Posted May 1, 2011 Posted May 1, 2011 UPDATED You guys are right, I probably should have done a higher resolution but with running a low resolution like this you can compare between pretty much any system be it netbook or gaming monster. Why you would want to that I don't know, but that is how I have all of these benchmarks set up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bishop245 Posted May 1, 2011 Posted May 1, 2011 lol Andrew look at my gpu again its an 8700M GT not an 8400M Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrewr05 Posted May 1, 2011 Posted May 1, 2011 lol Andrew look at my gpu again its an 8700M GT not an 8400M Fixed. oops... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ir_cow Posted May 1, 2011 Posted May 1, 2011 danm i realize i'm still using 2.1v...i don't want to redownload and run it again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now