3dMark 11

[mattyamdfanboi]

.4 and i can go further if ud like

[Nyt]

Try it. I'll be trying the highest I can go tomorrow. But theres a big storm now, so I wont dare turning my pc on .

I remember a couple weeks ago when all the nvidia fanboys were saying "Just wait till 3D Mark 11 comes out, the GTX480 will destroy all ATI cards when theres so much tessalation"

 

Hey Water_ Hazard , since I got the second post on this thread , can I make a score comparison chart ?

[mattyamdfanboi]

well they sorta are.. i can post links to a sli 480 scoring 11k... boys down here in aus

[Water_Hazard]

Hey Water_ Hazard , since I got the second post on this thread , can I make a score comparison chart ?

 

Sure. I was going to but work has been kicking my butt this week. Already over 50 hrs since monday

 

Edit: I've got some extra time now so I'm gonna start making a comparison chart

Edited December 9, 2010 by Water_Hazard

[Hedghawg71]

It dinged me on my drivers for my laptop being a little old... I tried the new drivers but the new drivers makes my G73 run like my old HP hunkacrappa... But2082 still isn't bad for a laptop.

[olokul]

3dMark 11 came out today, so I figured I would make a topic to post some scores.

 

Download Link

 

I only put scores that had a screen shot or a link to the score.

 

 

P10389 – Nyt Ryda – PII 1055T @ 4.0ghz / HD5970+5870 @ 975/1295

 

P7711 – Nyt Ryda – PII 1055T @ 4.0ghz / HD5970 @ 970/1290

 

P6459 – Water_Hazard – i7 950 @ 4.1ghz / GTX 480 @ 900/1800/3980

 

P6384 – SpeedwayNative – i7 930 @ Stock / HD 5970 @ Stock

 

P6117 – Mattyamdfanboi - PII 1055T @ 4.0ghz / GTX 580 @ 880/1760/2125

 

P5613 – Olokul - i7 950 @ 3.7ghz / GTX 480 @ 908/1816/2224

 

P5052 – Praz – PII @ 4.0ghz / 2xGTX 460 @ 850/1700/3850

 

P3806 – Praz – PII 1035T @ 4.0ghz / GTX 460 @ 850/1700/3850

 

P3155 – MercuryDoun – i7 930 @ 4.4ghz / HD 5770 @ 1010/1350

 

P2949 - WarWeeny – i5 @ 3.7ghz / HD 5770 @ 950/1350

 

 

hey water_hazard my score is wrong in post 17 i had a score of p6613 @ 907/1814/2424 i7 950 @ 3.7ghz i can get you a screen if you want, but for now you have my score from post #8 and speeds from #12, i know your tired and all so ill forgive you this one time

 

 

also how did you get your memory clock up to 3980 on the 480 afterburn will only let me go up to 2470 as a max

Edited December 10, 2010 by olokul

[mattyamdfanboi]

yer ditto.. my score was 6248.. maybe page 2?

[MercuryDoun]

You mentioned some ram timings... you really think it has that big a difference?? I think id like to test this, I ran 4.4Ghz through the bench with my ram at like 1650 or something, and at 6-8-6-20... I think ill drop it to like 1200mhz(i dont remember the exact number that the lowest divider gives me at 210bclk) and 9-9-9-28 and see what it does to my score. Have to wait until i get home to do the test though.

 

So i decided to test at 3.6Ghz instead of 4.4ghz... mostly because i didnt feel like messing with all my fans and blah blah blah... Plus i at 3.6 i was able to have a very wide range memory divider to REALLY test at high and low memory speeds. You will also notice that i not going to be linking any results pages, as they dont record memory settings either way. Plus during one of my tests i forgot to hit save on the document, and lost two of the links, so rather than try and find them again, i just left them all out, here are my results:

 

i7-930 @ 3.6Ghz

ATI 5770 @ 950core/1275mem

Mem = DDR3 1724mhz @ 6-8-6-20 1T

CPU physics score in 3dmark11 = 8907

 

i7-930 @ 3.6Ghz

ATI 5770 @ 950core/1275mem

Mem = DDR3 1724mhz @ 9-9-9-27 2T

CPU physics score in 3dmark11 = 8656

 

 

i7-930 @ 3.6Ghz

ATI 5770 @ 950core/1275mem

Mem = DDR3 1035 @ 6-8-6-20 1T

CPU physics score in 3dmark11 = 7130

 

 

i7-930 @ 3.6Ghz

ATI 5770 @ 950core/1275mem

Mem = DDR3 1035mhz @ 9-9-9-27 2T

CPU physics score in 3dmark11 = 6869

 

 

Well as you can see, turns out memory speeds and timings can make a pretty big difference in 3dmark cpu physics scores. The difference from DDR3 1035mhz @9-9-9-27 2T from DDR3 1724mhz @ 6-8-6-20 1T got me a MASSIVE increase of 2038 points!!!

 

Originally i think thinking that perhaps for the first time that ive ever seen that, memory mhz was worth more than timings... but i decided to try to go for the highest OC capable on my ram while still staying at 3.6Ghz it was able to do this with only a 8mhz core clock increase but take my memory up to 1814mhz @9-9-9-28 2T, however this proved to be that maximum overclock capable on my ram as I was unable to get a stable OC at anything significantly tighter than 9-9-9-27 2T stable enough to bench on, but I guess that’s pretty good for ram that is 1600mhz 7-8-7-24 stock eh? But here is what I got at almost the same 3.6Ghz:

 

i7-930 @ 3.6Ghz

ATI 5770 @ 950core/1275mem

Mem = DDR3 1811mhz @ 9-9-9-27 2T

CPU score in 3dmark11 = 8804

 

So it looks like getting those timings down is still the best way to OC your ram, but if your able to do both like I did, and increase the speed and decrease the timings, you might be able to get some VERY sick results.

 

Anyways I hope some of you guys find this info useful! Perhaps if you AMD boys can get your ram speeds up a bit using a different multi but not mess your timings uptoo bad, you might be able to get some better scores! I feel like im all doing is throwing fuel into the flame that is Nyt’s and Matty’s duel, lol.

[mattyamdfanboi]

thats really interesting!

 

but what effect did it have on the overall score???

[Nyt]

Looks good But I dont think it will be a major score booster , maybe a hundred points on P score . But still, Imma try get my timings down and frequency up.

[mikits]

P3130

Intel [email protected]

EVGA Geforce GTX460 768MB@763/950/1526

Edited December 10, 2010 by mikits

[Water_Hazard]

Sorry about the mix up yesterday guys. I think I fixed everything. Now back to hell... I mean work