SVTmofo Posted December 1, 2005 Posted December 1, 2005 i was just looking these two chips over on newegg. they are both based off of the toledo core, and both offer the 1mb cache per core..only differences that i noticed was the 300+$$$ price difference and the 200 mhz clock speed...am i missing anything here? if those are the only differences i think my decision is to go w/ the 4400 and just bump the speed up a bit.anyone got any opinions? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psychotic_god Posted December 2, 2005 Posted December 2, 2005 i was just looking these two chips over on newegg. they are both based off of the toledo core, and both offer the 1mb cache per core..only differences that i noticed was the 300+$$$ price difference and the 200 mhz clock speed...am i missing anything here? if those are the only differences i think my decision is to go w/ the 4400 and just bump the speed up a bit.anyone got any opinions? 587865[/snapback] I personaly think you'll be fine with a 4400. Its like the 4000+ and the FX-55, there isn't that huge of a difference, but there sure is a price one. You'll do good with the 4400, unless youre planning to be using your rig for a long time, that what the 4800 basically does, makes you set for a good amount of time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlimmerMan Posted December 2, 2005 Posted December 2, 2005 Why don't you buy the 4400 and OC to a 4800... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SVTmofo Posted December 2, 2005 Posted December 2, 2005 Why don't you buy the 4400 and OC to a 4800... 588619[/snapback] yea thats what im gettin at. wht would i be gettin for 300+ dollars and 200mhz..that was the plan if there are no huge differences in the two, just bump up the clock speed a lil bit Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psychotic_god Posted December 2, 2005 Posted December 2, 2005 yea thats what im gettin at. wht would i be gettin for 300+ dollars and 200mhz..that was the plan if there are no huge differences in the two, just bump up the clock speed a lil bit 588653[/snapback] This wouldn't be overclockers club if no-one overclocked, of course you can. So you good? you getting the 4400 and overclocking it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SVTmofo Posted December 2, 2005 Posted December 2, 2005 This wouldn't be overclockers club if no-one overclocked, of course you can. So you good? you getting the 4400 and overclocking it? 588940[/snapback] yea yea yea im good. i guess ill be gettin the 4400 then. just doesnt make much sense to crank the price up another 300 bucks for 200Mhz does it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fire_storm Posted December 2, 2005 Posted December 2, 2005 Its easy to overclock that cpu 200mhz can even go higher then that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICON57 Posted December 5, 2005 Posted December 5, 2005 go with the 4400.....all you are paying for is 200Mhz higher clock speed. you can easily oc that cpu beyond the 4800....i have my X2 3800 running 2.6 rock solid stable, on dfi mobo, and i bought my cpu for 300.00 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
apostolics Posted December 5, 2005 Posted December 5, 2005 check out my sig this chip ocs very cleanly but its not as overclockable as single core of course Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now