Jump to content


Photo

Sapphire HD 7970 6GB Vapor-X GHz Edition Reviewed


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

#1 Bosco

Bosco

    OCC Boss

  • Senior Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 32767 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada

Posted 27 September 2012 - 09:32 PM

ccokeman takes a look at Sapphire HD 7970 6GB Vapor-X GHz Edition:

http://www.overclock...6gb_vaporx_ghz/

Main Gaming Rig
Intel 3960X
MSI X79A-GD65 8D
16GB of Corsair Vengeance
2 X Titan X in SLI
Corsair Force 3 GT 240GB SSD
Coolermaster 932 Case
Noctua D14 CPU Cooler
Thermaltake Toughpower XT Platinum 1275 Watts
Asus 32" 4K Monitor
Donating to OCC :::: OCC Site Rules :::: OCC Reviews
RIP Verran and Nemo gone but never will be forgotten.


#2 El_Capitan

El_Capitan

    Even the sun goes down

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7172 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Somerville, MA

Posted 27 September 2012 - 10:23 PM

More fuel for the fire that more memory is not needed. :P

#3 freddie

freddie

    Up the Arsenal

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 704 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Western Australia

Posted 28 September 2012 - 05:04 AM

holding out for the 64gb version :P

#4 Waco

Waco

    Lab Rat 2

  • Reviewer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16285 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Los Alamos, NM

Posted 28 September 2012 - 05:09 AM

I'm not seeing the point when the $200 cheaper (at minimum) base 3 GB card performs essentially the same. :P

sig_zps2e3s65ua.png


#5 IVIYTH0S

IVIYTH0S

    They call me... General Help.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21614 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South, NJ

Posted 28 September 2012 - 02:17 PM

I'm not seeing the point when the $200 cheaper (at minimum) base 3 GB card performs essentially the same. :P

:withstupid: by the time the 6GB would be fully utlized, the GPU's strength itself is likely going to long have been bottlenecking performance.

"GilliumX58" DESKTOP
Mobo: Asus P8Z68-V-PRO | Processor: Intel Core i7 2600K @ 4.6ghz | CPU Cooler: Zalman CNPS9900MAXR | Videocard: ASUS GTX970 Strix
Memory: Patriot/Kingston 16GB 1866mhz | OS SSD: SanDisk Extreme 240GB SATA | PSU: PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750W
Monitor: Samsung 30" 305T | CD/DVD: Samsung SH-S223F | Keyboard: Sentey Phoenix | Mouse: Razer Lachesis

OCC Cool Club Member

 
 

Rebate Success Thread 2015---RMA Success Thread 2016---GPU Comparison tool on AnAndTech


#6 ccokeman

ccokeman

    ????????????

  • Reviewer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12195 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 28 September 2012 - 02:51 PM

Video cards are not always about gaming perf. GPU Acceleration of applications is a way to utilize the additional memory. I will be looking at adding in some tests.

Processor Intel Core I7 4790K  4.4Ghz
Memory Corsair Vengeance 16GB 2666Mhz
Motherboard Z97i
Graphics  GTX TitanX
Power Corsair AX 1200,
Monitor LG W3000H, ASUS VG236 x 3
Cooling Corsair H90

HyperX Savage 240GB SSD, 3TB Seagate
Follow OCC on facebook.png


#7 ekiM

ekiM

    I need help in BF:BC2

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 663 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, ON

Posted 28 September 2012 - 03:21 PM

I think we need to send Coke two more 2560x1600s to really push this thing :teehee:
"Why is it that when you take advantage of a tax break, you're a smart businessman, but if you take advantage of something you need to not be hungry (food stamps), you're a moocher?" Jon Stewart

#8 Stonerboy779

Stonerboy779

    Puts on Q701s d-_-b

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5271 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne, Australia

Posted 28 September 2012 - 06:30 PM

It needs a quadfire review :)

Hey Red, if you read this, feel like updreading again?

med_gallery_78215_532_67141.png

 

Man these spammers are geniuses...put (NO SPAM) in the thread title to hide the spam.  It's brilliant.  Hopefully this doesn't catch on...what if rapists wear signs that say (NOT A RAPIST)?  They will be raping everybody! D:

 

Donate to OCC - You could have won an SSD or GPU


#9 IVIYTH0S

IVIYTH0S

    They call me... General Help.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21614 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South, NJ

Posted 29 September 2012 - 03:09 AM

Video cards are not always about gaming perf. GPU Acceleration of applications is a way to utilize the additional memory. I will be looking at adding in some tests.

In regards to that though, wouldn't an nvidia card just be the better option?

"GilliumX58" DESKTOP
Mobo: Asus P8Z68-V-PRO | Processor: Intel Core i7 2600K @ 4.6ghz | CPU Cooler: Zalman CNPS9900MAXR | Videocard: ASUS GTX970 Strix
Memory: Patriot/Kingston 16GB 1866mhz | OS SSD: SanDisk Extreme 240GB SATA | PSU: PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750W
Monitor: Samsung 30" 305T | CD/DVD: Samsung SH-S223F | Keyboard: Sentey Phoenix | Mouse: Razer Lachesis

OCC Cool Club Member

 
 

Rebate Success Thread 2015---RMA Success Thread 2016---GPU Comparison tool on AnAndTech


#10 d6bmg

d6bmg

    BMG FTW!!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4152 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 29 September 2012 - 06:35 AM

6GB?
Posted Image

But what's the need?

boozei.gif


#11 d6bmg

d6bmg

    BMG FTW!!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4152 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 29 September 2012 - 06:37 AM

Paying $600 only for 6GB of mostly useless display memory is complete madness. :teehee:

boozei.gif


#12 freddie

freddie

    Up the Arsenal

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 704 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Western Australia

Posted 29 September 2012 - 06:56 AM

something to brag about i guess, an e-penis of some sort.