Jump to content

A High-end X79 Equipped with SAS and 4Way SLI - ECS X79R-AX


Recommended Posts

Three Intel CPUs with the Sandy Bridge-E architecture have appeared on the market at different prices

At the end of last year, two CPUs, the i7-3930K 6C12T Core and the 3960X, were released at the same time with the X79 chipset

More recently, the Core i7-3820 was launched as the third CPU, mainly due to differences in the architecture and price of the 4C8T

This appeared to give the entry-level LGA 2011 series a chance to compete with the high-end LGA 1155 series in the marketplace

Based on the cost of these two high-performance platforms, they fall within purchasing range of high-end PC consumers

 

The X79 chipset can be used with the LGA 2011 platform, and the environment is crowded with many brands of motherboards

In terms of options and prices, this has indirectly given greater flexibility to the X79, a development that is more beneficial to consumers

Now, we will share our findings on the X79-based X79R-AX that was released by ECS, a product positioned as part of the Black Series

EX7901.jpg

 

ECS has launched two models in the X79 space, the X79R-AX and the X79R-AX Deluxe

There should be some netizens who together with me will feel the X79R-AX Deluxe is the more high-end version, yet in fact, the X79R-AX is the higher level version

A glance shows that the X79R-AX uses black as the main color with white and gray as style accents

EX7902.jpg

 

The dimensions meet the 305mm x 244mm ATX form factor, allowing the choice of a wide range of cases

The X79 is part of the Intel Extreme platform, and the price is a few levels higher than the mid-range to high-end Z68 chipset, but the specifications are almost all higher level

EX7903.jpg

 

Included Accessories

English user manual, a quick start installation manual, an IO shield, an optical disk with driver software, a USB 3.0 front panel and a mobile connect wireless

EX7904.jpg

 

An SATA cable that connects to external eSATA devices, a protective plastic cover for the IO interface, SLI bridge

EX7905.jpg

 

Lower Left of Motherboard

4 X PCI-E X16, supporting up to 4-Way AMD CrossFireX/nVIDIA SLI technology

Bandwidths of X16 + X8 + X16 + X8

2 X PCI-E X1

Dual LAN chip, the Realtek RTL8111E

The audio chip is the Realtek ALC892, with 8 channels supporting HD Audio technology

EX7906.jpg

 

Bottom Right of Motherboard

The X79R-AX allows the addition of quite a few SATA expansion ports, from right to left as follows

Two gray SATA ports supported by the X79 chipset with SATA3 specifications

Four white SATA ports supported by the X79 chipset with SATA2 specifications

The above can be paired to set up RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 5 and RAID 10, depending on the highest performance SATA device that has been installed

Four gray SATA ports enabled by the ASM1601 chip with the SATA3 SAS specification, supporting RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 10

Two gray SATA ports enabled by the ASM1601 chip with SATA3 specifications, supporting AHCI

(Simultaneously pressed) the Power/Reset/clr CMOS button and troubleshooting LED lights, to the far left in the front is the black USB 3.0 expansion port

EX7907.jpg

 

Top Right of Motherboard

24PIN power input, and below, six crossed round terminals allowing users to directly measure the voltage of the hardware with a multimeter

EX7908.jpg

 

Top of Motherboard

The CPU uses 14 MOS drivers for the power supply combined with a very tactile thermal module that helps the MOSFET dissipate heat

To the right and left are four DDR3 DIMMs supporting 1600/1866/2133/2400/2500 of memory with maximum capacity of 64GB

DDR3 exceeding 2400 meets the OC specification, supporting the latest four-channel technology

EX7909.jpg

 

IO

One Clear CMOS button

One PS/2 keyboard/mouse port

Six USB 2.0 ports (Red/Black)

Two eSATA3/USB 2.0 ports (red)

One Wireless LAN dongle

One Bluetooth dongle

Four USB 3.0 ports (blue)

Two RJ-45 Ethernet ports

Six audio jacks

EX7910.jpg

Edited by windwithme

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Qooltech IV cooling device, which displays an orange pattern when the temperature rises to a certain range

EX7911.jpg

 

Back of motherboard has MOS driver components

EX7912.jpg

 

X79 heat sink, which will also display a special color when the temperature reaches a certain level

The MOSFETs and chipsets all use Qooltech IV cooling modules, which together with the heatpipe design can effectively balance the temperature on both sides

EX7913.jpg

 

Photo of UEFI, providing choice of 10 different languages

EX79B01.jpg

 

M.I.B X-

Can set clock parameters or voltage settings for CPU and DRAM

EX79B02.jpg

 

Voltage Levels

CPU VCORE Voltage -300 to +700 mV

CPU VSA Voltage -300 to +600 mV

CPU VTT Voltage -200 to +500 mV

PCH Voltage -200 to +300 mV

DRAM Voltage -300 to +500 mV

EX79B03.jpg

 

Page with information on CPU and related technology

If you want to fix the CPU clock to avoid being beat by energy-saving technology, you should select the following two options

Turn off Power Technology and Enhanced Halt (C1E)

EX79B04.jpg

 

Page on advanced CPU options

This can be used to independently set the multiplier for each CPU Core, and here all the CPU multipliers are set to 46

EX79B05.jpg

 

Page on DDR3 settings

Turn on XMP technology, allowing the DDR3 clock to increase to 2133

Detailed parameters are Cl9 11-10-27 2T

EX79B06.jpg

 

PC Health Status

EX79B07.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With the Smart Fan page, the user can adjust the mode of the fan speed to the reach the desired balance between cooling and quiet

EX79B08.jpg

 

The above is for the ECS X79 UEFI interface with all of the options turned on

If you want to overclock the CPU FSB and DDR3, it is recommended that you set the CPU VSA Voltage to between 1.000 and 1.200V

It is easier to set the CPU overclocking multiplier: all you need to do is find a voltage that allows the CPU cooling system to operate stably

Basically there are only three voltages that need to be set, these overclocking factors are the same as with other X79s

The above photo shows the CPU/DDR3 set for 4.6GHz/2133, and is provided as reference to users with the same platform

 

Test platform

CPU: Intel Core i7-3960X

Motherboard: ECS X79R-AX

DRAM: CORSAIR DOMINATOR-GT CMT16GX3M4X2133C9

VGA: msi N560GTX-Ti Twin Frozr II

Storage: CORSAIR Performance Pro Series 128GB

POWER: Thermaltake, Toughpower Grand 1200W

Cooler: Intel RTS 2011LC

OS: Windows 7 Ultimate, 64bit

EX7914.jpg

 

Overclocking

CPU 99.8 X 46 => 4590.8MHz full speed 1.356V

Enabled C1E and turned off Turbo Boost

DDR3 2128.4 Cl9 11-10-27 2T XMP mode 1.524V

 

Hyper PI 32M X 12 => 12m 25.822s

CPUMARK 99 => 702

EX79OPI.png

 

x264, FHD Benchmark => 36.1

Fritz Chess Benchmark => 50.88/24424

EX79ONM.png

 

CrystalMark 2004R3 => 450212

EX79OCM.png

 

CINEBENCH R11.5

CPU => 13.40 pts

CPU (Single Core) => 1.86 pts The

EX79OCB.png

 

FRYRENDER

Running Time => 2m 54s

EX79OFRY.png

 

PCMark Vantage => 24951

EX79OPCVAN.png

 

The cooling device is the Intel RTS 2011LC, and we switched to a single 12cm high-speed fan that performed well while overclocking at 4.6GHz

At full speed, the CPU voltage falls to 1.356V, and it passed several software tests and other burn-in software

For single-threaded performance we used the old CPUMARK software or CINEBENCH R11.5, both of which provided data of considerable accuracy

The above-mentioned benchmarks support 6C12T multithreading, and the 3960X currently provides nearly the highest performance data on desktop platforms

For overclocking similar CPUs, we recommend the use of appropriate voltage and clock adjustments in accordance with the class of cooling device and the CPU on hand

 

DRAM Test

DDR3 1596.6 CL6 7-7-24 1T

ADIA64 Memory Read - 20083 MB / s

Sandra Memory Bandwidth - 40 134 MB / s

MaXXMEM Memory-Copy - 16374 MB / s

MaXXMEM Reached multi-memory score - 27.56 GByte / sec

EX79O1600.png

 

DDR3 1862.8 CL8 9-9-27 1T

ADIA64 Memory Read - 20329 MB / s

Sandra Memory Bandwidth - 45 782 MB / s

MaXXMEM Memory-Copy - 16723 MB / s

MaXXMEM Reached multi-memory score - 30.70 GByte / sec

EX79O1866.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DDR3 2128.4 Cl9 11-10-27 2T the XMP mode

ADIA64 Memory Read - 21312 MB / s

Sandra Memory Bandwidth - 50 004 MB / s

MaXXMEM Memory-Copy - 17276 MB / s

MaXXMEM Reached multi-memory score - 32.39 GByte / sec

EX79OXMP.png

 

Performance comparison of bandwidth with dual-channel LGA 1155 and four-channel LGA 2011

I found that Sandra Memory Bandwidth achieved two times the level of dual-channel bandwidth when compared with CrystalMark

MaXXMEM reached multi-memory score is also about 50% higher compared with dual-channel

Other software at DDR3 bandwidth and dual channel were similar or lower: in the future we may need software that can support four-channel technology

 

Test of Three Clocks with Different Parameters to Compare Bandwidth Differences

If Sandra Memory Bandwidth is used as a benchmark, DDR3 efficiency will increase 14% from 1600 to 1866

If DDR3 is boosted from 1866 1T to 2133 2T, performance increases by 9.2%: the above was done with DDR3 bandwidth under various clock changes

 

Power Consumption Test

The OS Desktop did not use any software and C1E power-saving technology was turned on - 80W

EX79OWC1E.jpg

 

OS Desktop did not use any software and the C1E power saving technology was turned off - 174W

EX79OWIDLE.jpg

 

With LinX running, we allowed the CPU to reach full speed - 322W

EX79OWLINX.jpg

 

There was little difference in power consumption performance compared with several other X79s I’ve tried before

What’s worth mentioning is that the X79R-AX’s overclocking performance was a bit lower with the C1E standby status enabled

If you use overclocking for a long time, I would recommend that you enable the C1E function for better performance in terms of temperature and power consumption

 

Temperature performance (room temperature about 21 degrees)

System Standby - 24 to 31

EX79OT1.png

 

Running LinX with CPU at full speed - 61 to 71

EX79OT2.png

 

For cooling, we used the Intel RTS 2011LC modular cooling system

This allowed the 3960X OC 4.6GHz desktop to achieve a quite low temperature in a standby environment

In addition, at full speed, the maximum temperature reached only about 71 degrees, so overclocking settings and temperature conditions were more suitable for long-term use

 

3D test

msi N560GTX-Ti Twin Frozr II

3DMark Vantage CPU SCORE => 89 479

EX79O3DVAN.png

 

FINAL FANTASY XIV

1920 X 1080 = 4705

EX79OSFF14.jpg

 

StreetFighter IV Benchmark

1920 X-1080 special effects set to maximum => 158.79 FPS

EX79OSTF4.jpg

 

For the 3D performance of a single GTX560 Ti, the LGA 1155 or LGA 2011 currently still achieve the highest standards of a desktop

For the same VGA combined with a different level CPU, the 3D performance will be different: the performance of the Sandy Bridge-E architecture is quite good

In addition, the X79R-AX can support technology up to the same four VGA CrossFireX or SLI boards

For users who need a higher level of 3D performance, based on their needs, they can install the number of VGA boards necessary to obtain higher performance

 

Also with room temperature at about 21 degrees and the 3960X OC overclocking at 4.6GHz, we used temperature measurement tools to check the temperature of the MOSFET

In standby with C1E enabled, the temperature was about 36.1 degrees, and with C1E disabled, it went up to about 53.9 degrees, and the highest CPU burn-in temperature is approximately 79.2 degrees

Compared with several X79s that I’ve used, the temperature performance of the X79R-AX in standby was relatively higher

At full speed, the temperature was a little lower than the other two X79s, and the average performance of these two models was above average

If you encounter a MOSFET temperature above 80 degrees, I would recommend overclocking to strengthen the heat dissipation in the area of the MOSFET

In this article, windwithme has shared temperature measurements in each X79 as reference

 

ECS X79R-AX

Strengths

1. The overseas price is about US$310, equivalent to about NT$9175, a better value than a mid-range X79

2. Equipped with the SAS specification’s SATA design, up to 12 internal SATA devices may be installed

3. A rarely seen transmission design for wireless LAN and Bluetooth dongle communications

4. Qooltech IV cooling modules use a serial configuration of MOSFET chipsets for better heat dissipation

5. The high-end X79 has a 4-Way AMD CrossFireX/nVIDIA SLI configuration

6. Use of 14 MOS drivers for power supply, PCI-E, Gen3, CPU/DDR3 installed 15μ gold contacts

 

Weaknesses

1. DDR3 is only available in 4DIMM packaging

2. When overclocking the CPU, the UEFI interface needs to be enhanced for stability

3. Market visibility and after sales service channels have room for improvement

 

EX7915.jpg

 

Performance ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ 85/100

Materials ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ 90/100

Specifications ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ 91/100

Appearance ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ 79/100

Cost ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ 83/100

 

The visibility of ECS in the Taiwan market is not so good, but ECS brand motherboards are continuing to improve

The X79R-A is better in terms of components and specifications than some other similarly priced X79s, and it even approaches some high-end X79 specifications

In recent years in its high-end product lines, ECS has made visible progress and innovation, which is worthy of recognition

With an 8DIMM design, the X79R-A can reach specifications of a very comprehensive standard

 

Performance after overclocking was also good with DDR3 bandwidth from 1600 to 2133 above average

The price of the X79R-AX was similar to or slightly higher than other motherboard makers’ entry-level X79s

However, the overall specifications of the components were close to high-end standards in the X79 market, with a good cost to performance ratio among high-end X79 platforms

ECS will be fairly competitive with a future 8DIMM version and in addition to improved hardware, better market channels :)

 

This article is also post in my blog WIND3C, Any comments are welcome.

Edited by windwithme
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ECS is a crap board. They are still trying to breach the enthusiast market with their OEM quality boards.

 

They can add all the bells and whistles they want but until they build better quality PCBs they will remain crap compared to ASUS/Gigabyte/Etc.

 

Thanks for the crap review.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice review, you do better reviews then most online. But I agree RJR that is ECS is not even worth reviewing. They are very cheap.

 

 

But I dont agree with RJR calling your review crap. :nono: :nono: :nono: :nono:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ECS is a crap board. They are still trying to breach the enthusiast market with their OEM quality boards.

 

They can add all the bells and whistles they want but until they build better quality PCBs they will remain crap compared to ASUS/Gigabyte/Etc.

 

Thanks for the crap review.

 

hey RJR. I can appreciate ones opinion but while you are here please try to be more respectful of people like wind that post there reviews here out of courtesy.

 

Nice review windwithme. I enjoyed it. For what its worth i may need to try an ecs board one of these days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had good luck with lower-end ECS boards. The one in my HTPC has been on 24/7 for nearly 4 years now. I honestly don't think it's ever crashed.

 

I wouldn't, however, get one for overclocking. They tend to skimp on the power circuitry more than I'm comfortable with.

 

 

Thanks for the review WWM!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@windwithme: Good review! The one thing I love about the board is the fact that it have 802.11 dongle with it along with blue-tooth dongle. Having wifi dongle is very much useful indeed.

 

@RJR: Sadly, ECS mainly works as OEM brand. :lol: I think you don't know that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ECS is a crap board. They are still trying to breach the enthusiast market with their OEM quality boards.

 

They can add all the bells and whistles they want but until they build better quality PCBs they will remain crap compared to ASUS/Gigabyte/Etc.

 

Thanks for the crap review.

 

 

Nothing wrong with ECS PCB's and they are NOT trying to breach the entusiast market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...