8 replies to this topic
#1
ericgcollyer
-
- Members
-
- 236 posts
Member
- Gender:Male
- Location:La Canada, CA
Posted 27 March 2012 - 01:39 PM
#2
Waco
-
- Reviewer
-
- 16503 posts
Lab Rat 2
- Gender:Male
- Location:Los Alamos, NM
Posted 27 March 2012 - 01:40 PM
RAID 1 by far, especially with small writes.
Tolerance is a sign of weakness.
#3
El_Capitan
-
- Members
-
- 7174 posts
Even the sun goes down
- Gender:Male
- Location:Somerville, MA
Posted 27 March 2012 - 01:46 PM
Depends on what you're wanting them for. I'd always go for RAID 10 or RAID 1 over RAID 5, but that's just me.
My Blog ->> Computer Hardware Upgrades
My Stuff -> For sale | My System Builds
Guides -> Overclocking Phenom II x6 CPU's with PhenomMsrTweaker | Nvidia GPU BIOS voltage unlock and flashing | Overclocking the i5 2500k / i7 2600k | AMD Catalyst Un-install Utility
Other -> The Official Duel Thread | Recommended Cases List | TIM Roundups and Comparison List
My Stuff -> For sale | My System Builds
Guides -> Overclocking Phenom II x6 CPU's with PhenomMsrTweaker | Nvidia GPU BIOS voltage unlock and flashing | Overclocking the i5 2500k / i7 2600k | AMD Catalyst Un-install Utility
Other -> The Official Duel Thread | Recommended Cases List | TIM Roundups and Comparison List
#4
bigball1
-
- Members
-
- 600 posts
Geek
- Gender:Male
- Location:Nova Scotia, Canada
Posted 27 March 2012 - 03:09 PM
raid 1 for good read speeds ok write speeds
raid 0 for good read write speeds
raid 5 good read speeds but has poor write speeds
raid 0 for good read write speeds
raid 5 good read speeds but has poor write speeds
Edited by Bigball1, 28 March 2012 - 11:06 AM.
#5
ir_cow
-
- Reviewer
-
- 6153 posts
I Am A Cow...
- Gender:Male
- Location:MT
Posted 27 March 2012 - 04:30 PM
i suggest raid 1 unless you are doing work that requires more speed.
raid-1- 1 drive can fail, hence redundant
raid-0 - either drive goes bad and you lose all the data, none recoverable
raid-5 - speed of raid-0 BUT if more than 1 drive goes bad at a time you lose everything
if you limited to only 3 drives i would go with raid-5 for the speed and simi redundancy,
if you can get more (like 4 or more) go with raid-6 (basically raid-0 with redundancy)
otherwise, like i said at the start, if you don't need speed and want to save money, just get 2 drives and go with raid-1.
raid-1- 1 drive can fail, hence redundant
raid-0 - either drive goes bad and you lose all the data, none recoverable
raid-5 - speed of raid-0 BUT if more than 1 drive goes bad at a time you lose everything
if you limited to only 3 drives i would go with raid-5 for the speed and simi redundancy,
if you can get more (like 4 or more) go with raid-6 (basically raid-0 with redundancy)
otherwise, like i said at the start, if you don't need speed and want to save money, just get 2 drives and go with raid-1.
Filckr Photostream / Intel Pentium G3258 OC Guide / NVIDIA GTX 1070 OC Guide
Main Rig: i7 3960X @ 4.3Ghz, ASUS X79 R4BE, Geforce GTX 1080Ti, Intel 730(s) 480GB, 64GB DDR3 1600, Seasonic 1000w Plat.
Review Test Rig: : i7-4770k @ 4.2ghz, MSI-GD65 Gaming, Geforce GTX 770 , Corsair Force GT 240 GB, Patriot 16 GB 2400 (2x8gb), Thermaltake 750w.
#6
ericgcollyer
-
- Members
-
- 236 posts
Member
- Gender:Male
- Location:La Canada, CA
Posted 28 March 2012 - 07:26 AM
Thanks for all the replies. I've noticed that I have become somewhat of a leech in the forum, asking a whole lot more questions than I am answering. I will change as of today, you guys are the best.
I'm not sure if RAID 5 actually has improved write speeds. I currently have a RAID 5 array, but seem to get slow write speeds compared to a single drive I have in my system. I was just trying to get some opinions from other system builders. Thanks for all the help you have given me over the past couple of months.
I'm not sure if RAID 5 actually has improved write speeds. I currently have a RAID 5 array, but seem to get slow write speeds compared to a single drive I have in my system. I was just trying to get some opinions from other system builders. Thanks for all the help you have given me over the past couple of months.
#7
Waco
-
- Reviewer
-
- 16503 posts
Lab Rat 2
- Gender:Male
- Location:Los Alamos, NM
Posted 28 March 2012 - 07:57 AM
RAID 1 is preferable in every way over RAID 5 when you have few drives. Unless you're doing 4+ drives in RAID 5 it's pointless. I would also suggest avoiding RAID 5 entirely if your drives are 1 TB or more because of the chances of a rebuild failure.
Tolerance is a sign of weakness.
#8
MercuryDoun
-
- Members
-
- 1549 posts
Banana
- Gender:Male
- Location:South Eastern Michigan, USA
Posted 28 March 2012 - 08:58 AM
both raid 5 and raid 1 have write overhead that slows writes, but they both have quite good read speeds. At least with modern raid controllers.
And dont do raid 6... its not like raid 0 with redundancy... its raid 5 except with two parody drives instead of only one... Its even slower than raid 5 is!
Really the easiest way to decide is, even number of drives(2 or 4) go with RAID1 or 1+0(AKA 10), odd number of drives(3 or 5) go with raid-5.
This isn't knew information, im mostly just repeating what everyone else has already said, but another opinion never hurts!
And dont do raid 6... its not like raid 0 with redundancy... its raid 5 except with two parody drives instead of only one... Its even slower than raid 5 is!
Really the easiest way to decide is, even number of drives(2 or 4) go with RAID1 or 1+0(AKA 10), odd number of drives(3 or 5) go with raid-5.
This isn't knew information, im mostly just repeating what everyone else has already said, but another opinion never hurts!
*My System*
>< Case: Corsair 350D >< PSU: Corsair AX AX760 >< MoBo: ASUS Maximums VII Gene ><
>< CPU: i5-4690k @ 4.8GHz >< CPU Cooler: Corsair H110 >< TIM: Artic Silver MTX ><
>< RAM: Gskill Trident 16GB(2x8gb) 2400MHz @ 10-12-12-2T ><
>< SSD1: Samsung 840 pro 512GB SSD >< SSD2: Crucial Sata3 480GB SSD ><
>< GPU: EVGA nVidia GTX 980 @ 1500mhz/7600mhz >< Monitor: Samsung U28D590 4k monitor of awesomeness ><
My gold plated butt-plug business is being sued by Apple. Apparently they have a patent for overpriced crap for a holes.
#9
Waco
-
- Reviewer
-
- 16503 posts
Lab Rat 2
- Gender:Male
- Location:Los Alamos, NM
Posted 28 March 2012 - 09:10 AM
Well RAID 1 writes as fast as a single drive. RAID 5 can write about the same for large files but it's slooooow for small writes.
Tolerance is a sign of weakness.
