Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 3 votes

3dMark 11


  • Please log in to reply
919 replies to this topic

#37 Shadowtroop

Shadowtroop

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 368 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Austin, Texas

Posted 08 December 2010 - 12:55 PM

mine locked up just before loading the combined test -_-

Posted Image
Coolermaster HAF 932/ ASUS Crosshair IV/ ATI Radeon 5970/ AMD Phenom II X4 965 C3/ Corsair TX850W
Custom Loop; Swiftek Microres/ MCP 655 Pump/ XSPC RX360 Radiator with push/pull Scythe GentleTyphoons/ EK Supreme HF and EK 5970 Waterblock

** Noctua Owners Club: NH-U12P SE2 **


#38 Speedway

Speedway

    IRL is back, Go Penske!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2265 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Speedway, IN

Posted 08 December 2010 - 12:59 PM

Hence what I mean about intel scores higher.. My gpu averages in the 80's throughout the bench dropping into the 60's n top around mid 90's briefly... So I'm thinking bottleneck.. Bah!!



matty, sorry but here I have to disagree! With the previous benchmarks from FutureMark, the differences between an Intel i7 cpu's and AMD cpu were pretty substantial! I absolutely don't think this is the case here! Seems like this test has made that gap much closer! I guess I don't understand why you think differently!

Life Begins @ 220mph


I7 2600K - ASUS Maximus IV Extreme-Z - 16GB Mushkin Redline 2133MHz - ASUS GTX 680- (2) Corsair Force GT 120GB SSDs RAID 0 - (2) 750GB WD Black HDDs RAID 0 - 900W Tagan BZ Series - U2-UFO

Dual Loop Water Cooling - Koolance RP-452X2 - CPU -> Koolance CPU-360 - Thermochill TA 120.3 - Liang D5 GPU -> D5 - XSPC RX360 - Koolance VID-NX680

The Cube Build Log - Update Coming


Guide for Unlocking MSi Afterburner


Heatware


#39 Locutus

Locutus

    Fortune favors the bold.

  • Folding Member
  • 2011 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Largo, FL

Posted 08 December 2010 - 01:11 PM

mine locked up just before loading the combined test -_-

Mine did the same right at the end of combined. :/

I didn't feel like watching the two intro movies again just to run it again, so I'll do it some other time.

Heatware - Ebay

"I can't believe I ate the entire kitten!"

 

sigimage.gif


#40 cery25

cery25

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 405 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Romania

Posted 08 December 2010 - 01:20 PM

mine is p3458 on pIIx4 [email protected] + gtx 460 835/3910 driver 260.99
there are others with my sistem specs cpu+gpu and score 4000 or more
wtf ?
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/59512

Edited by cery25, 24 December 2010 - 05:48 AM.

Thermaltake V3 BE -- 3 x 120mm blue leds -- AeroCool F6XT
I5 3570k -4Ghz -- Corsair H60 -- Msi Z77A-G43
Asus HD6870  -- K. HyperX 2x2 Gb DDR3 1600
Wd 500 Gb -- Lc Power Titan 2 600w -- Acer V243HQ
Thermaltake Challenger -- Gigayte M6880 Laser Game

2138774.png


#41 mattyamdfanboi

mattyamdfanboi

    Certified Geek

  • FW Team Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1368 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne

Posted 08 December 2010 - 01:36 PM

Why is your i7 stock?? Water cooling break or something?? I also like how the stock i7-930 = same score as 4.0Ghz 1055t... Makes me glad i took the plunge into the i7... current gen AMD is pretty bad... Cant wait for Bulldozer though!!




thats the reason why i think like that... my 4ghz cpu scores lower than ur stock... and ur telling me that they are now closer??? lol yer.. real close :/
Phenom II x6 1055T 4.2ghz, Inno3D GTX 580 x2 940/1880/2200, 8gb Kingston HyperX Blu 1567mhz, 890FXA-UD5 Gigabyte, Corsair TX850

Posted Image

Posted Image

#42 Waco

Waco

    Lab Rat 2

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16508 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Los Alamos, NM

Posted 08 December 2010 - 03:02 PM

thats the reason why i think like that... my 4ghz cpu scores lower than ur stock... and ur telling me that they are now closer??? lol yer.. real close :/

i7s always score drastically higher in synthetic and scientific benchmarks. :shrug:

Tolerance is a sign of weakness.


#43 mattyamdfanboi

mattyamdfanboi

    Certified Geek

  • FW Team Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1368 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne

Posted 08 December 2010 - 03:32 PM

my point exactly... :)

i get owned in synthetic tests even though this is the fastest single gpu card on the planet and when oc'd (as seen in the duel arena) im beating even the 5970 by a nice margin (both oc'd btw)


synthetics r fun play things :)
Phenom II x6 1055T 4.2ghz, Inno3D GTX 580 x2 940/1880/2200, 8gb Kingston HyperX Blu 1567mhz, 890FXA-UD5 Gigabyte, Corsair TX850

Posted Image

Posted Image

#44 Bosco

Bosco

    OCC Boss

  • Senior Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 32943 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada

Posted 08 December 2010 - 03:49 PM

my point exactly... :)

i get owned in synthetic tests even though this is the fastest single gpu card on the planet and when oc'd (as seen in the duel arena) im beating even the 5970 by a nice margin (both oc'd btw)


synthetics r fun play things :)


Whats your score?

Main Gaming Rig
Intel 6700K
MSI Board
32GB Gskill
Titan X
Samsung 1TB SSD
Corsair 600T White
Noctua D14 CPU Cooler
Corsair 1200 Watt PSU
Asus 32" 4K Monitor
Donating to OCC :::: OCC Site Rules :::: OCC Reviews
RIP Verran and Nemo gone but never will be forgotten.


#45 mattyamdfanboi

mattyamdfanboi

    Certified Geek

  • FW Team Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1368 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne

Posted 08 December 2010 - 04:13 PM

the best i could manage in 3dmark is 6248... with clocks at 907/1814/2125

substantial clock which in every game bench smashes everyones scores so far, but in synthetics.. im let down
Phenom II x6 1055T 4.2ghz, Inno3D GTX 580 x2 940/1880/2200, 8gb Kingston HyperX Blu 1567mhz, 890FXA-UD5 Gigabyte, Corsair TX850

Posted Image

Posted Image

#46 Bosco

Bosco

    OCC Boss

  • Senior Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 32943 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada

Posted 08 December 2010 - 04:22 PM

Gotcha.

I am pulling P6811 right now running the VC at stock.

Main Gaming Rig
Intel 6700K
MSI Board
32GB Gskill
Titan X
Samsung 1TB SSD
Corsair 600T White
Noctua D14 CPU Cooler
Corsair 1200 Watt PSU
Asus 32" 4K Monitor
Donating to OCC :::: OCC Site Rules :::: OCC Reviews
RIP Verran and Nemo gone but never will be forgotten.


#47 mattyamdfanboi

mattyamdfanboi

    Certified Geek

  • FW Team Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1368 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne

Posted 08 December 2010 - 04:39 PM

yer thats a nice score.. theres a couple of guys in oz crackin near 9k with that card oc'd... which is weird.. sli 480s down here r at 11k and tri sli 580s r at 16k... :O
Phenom II x6 1055T 4.2ghz, Inno3D GTX 580 x2 940/1880/2200, 8gb Kingston HyperX Blu 1567mhz, 890FXA-UD5 Gigabyte, Corsair TX850

Posted Image

Posted Image

#48 Waco

Waco

    Lab Rat 2

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16508 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Los Alamos, NM

Posted 08 December 2010 - 05:00 PM

synthetics r fun play things :)

Games just aren't CPU limited very often. :) If anything you tend to see absolute maximum framerates rise with obscenely fast CPUs - averages and minimums don't usually change much going from high-clocked AMD to high-clocked Intel with "normal" graphics setups. Tri-SLI and Tri/Quadfire tend to scale better with faster CPUs but they still don't make a monstrous difference in most games.

Anyone remember how touchy 3dMark 99 and 2001 were to memory timings? Tightening them up could drastically increase your score even when the real-world benefit was next to nothing. :P

Edited by Waco, 08 December 2010 - 05:02 PM.

Tolerance is a sign of weakness.