Bosco Posted October 1, 2009 Posted October 1, 2009 ccokeman is out in California and has posted a little bit about the happenings going on. I am sure there will be more added as the next 2 days go on. http://www.overclockersclub.com/reviews/nvidia_gtc/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scr4wl Posted October 1, 2009 Posted October 1, 2009 Cool can't wait to see how it performs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
premiumgfx Posted October 1, 2009 Posted October 1, 2009 Good to see some OCC presence there! ^_^ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenitaL Posted October 1, 2009 Posted October 1, 2009 I smell big Trouble for ATI Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hardnrg Posted October 1, 2009 Posted October 1, 2009 Wow, nice to finally see official specs on the Fermi/GT300... decent step up in specs, and the L2 cache and 64-bit addressing will no doubt push GPGPU/CUDA forward at an even faster rate Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IVIYTH0S Posted October 1, 2009 Posted October 1, 2009 nice, the specs sound frightening AND the card isn't oversized. I smell a shut out (not to mention it will be multi purpose) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
N.E.A Posted October 1, 2009 Posted October 1, 2009 (edited) I smell big Trouble for ATI me too 8800 memory bus is back too ... but since it is GDRR5 i think it will be fast , but why did not ati increase the memory bus ...? i just got a thought , 360/375 will be 384-bit but the high end will be 448-bit .. what do you think..? Edited October 1, 2009 by N.E.A Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Smith Posted October 1, 2009 Posted October 1, 2009 Wow, nice to finally see official specs on the Fermi/GT300... decent step up in specs, and the L2 cache and 64-bit addressing will no doubt push GPGPU/CUDA forward at an even faster rate Yeah the plugin for C++ looks very interesting. I see Fermi being a direct competitor to Larrabee in the GPGPU computing area when it launches. But they did not talk much about gaming performance, did they? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waco Posted October 1, 2009 Posted October 1, 2009 (edited) ...but why did not ati increase the memory bus ...? Wider memory buses are *very* expensive both on the die and on the physical card. GDDR5 is about twice as fast per clock as GDDR3/GDDR4 so a wider bus isn't needed for monstrous amounts of bandwidth. The thing I'm excited about is the C++ compiler for it! I bet Intel just . it's pants. Edited October 1, 2009 by Waco Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulktreg Posted October 1, 2009 Posted October 1, 2009 Won't need a motherboard soon, the graphics card will do it all! Cheers Paul Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Compxpert Posted October 1, 2009 Posted October 1, 2009 It is nice to see fierce competition. I'd assume though ATi also has something in the works though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccokeman Posted October 1, 2009 Posted October 1, 2009 Won't need a motherboard soon, the graphics card will do it all! Cheers Paul The term Co processing is being badied about. The GPU is not being looked at as a replacement for the CPU snce the CPU is great at serial functions while the GPU is better on the parallel functions . Meaning the two together do the work faster Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts