Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

3DMark Competition


  • Please log in to reply
839 replies to this topic

#349 rourkchris

rourkchris

    not wearing pants

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1337 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santa Rosa, California

Posted 25 August 2009 - 09:52 AM

3D Mark 06 Q9550 @ 3.4Ghz 2 Sapphire Vapor-X 4890s crossfired @ 900/1100. Score 20017


Edited by rourkchris, 25 August 2009 - 09:58 AM.

i7 970 6 core 32nm Gulftown OCd to 4Ghz
Prolimatech Megahalems w/2 Scythe fans
Asus Rampage II GENE X58
12 GB Mushkin DDR3 1600 6-7-6-18-60-1T
EVGA GTX 580
PC P&C 750 watt
Vista Premium 64-bit
Hanns-G 28" 1920x1200

Posted Image

#350 rourkchris

rourkchris

    not wearing pants

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1337 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santa Rosa, California

Posted 25 August 2009 - 07:47 PM

3D Mark 05 Score 24028
i7 970 6 core 32nm Gulftown OCd to 4Ghz
Prolimatech Megahalems w/2 Scythe fans
Asus Rampage II GENE X58
12 GB Mushkin DDR3 1600 6-7-6-18-60-1T
EVGA GTX 580
PC P&C 750 watt
Vista Premium 64-bit
Hanns-G 28" 1920x1200

Posted Image

#351 rourkchris

rourkchris

    not wearing pants

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1337 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santa Rosa, California

Posted 25 August 2009 - 08:01 PM

3D Mark 03 Score 80641


i7 970 6 core 32nm Gulftown OCd to 4Ghz
Prolimatech Megahalems w/2 Scythe fans
Asus Rampage II GENE X58
12 GB Mushkin DDR3 1600 6-7-6-18-60-1T
EVGA GTX 580
PC P&C 750 watt
Vista Premium 64-bit
Hanns-G 28" 1920x1200

Posted Image

#352 rourkchris

rourkchris

    not wearing pants

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1337 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santa Rosa, California

Posted 25 August 2009 - 08:12 PM

3D Mark 2001SE Score 42392


i7 970 6 core 32nm Gulftown OCd to 4Ghz
Prolimatech Megahalems w/2 Scythe fans
Asus Rampage II GENE X58
12 GB Mushkin DDR3 1600 6-7-6-18-60-1T
EVGA GTX 580
PC P&C 750 watt
Vista Premium 64-bit
Hanns-G 28" 1920x1200

Posted Image

#353 The Smith

The Smith

    Total Nerd

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4291 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Quebec, Canada

Posted 27 August 2009 - 06:12 PM

Updated guys.

Sorry for the wait. :(


Socket 1366 OC competition - 3DMark Competition - AMD Overclocking Competition
Posted Image
"They should have just called it the Intel Core iAMBROKE." -cirro


#354 Mikesnow

Mikesnow

    Member

  • FW Team Member
  • PipPip
  • 298 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Montgomery, Texas

Posted 29 August 2009 - 01:33 AM

Here is my laptop I just bought yesterday, figured why not break it in with a few benchmarks lol

Asus G71Gx

3dmark2001se

Posted Image

After reading the article on the laptop and the 10k 06 score i went ahead and ran that on it too.

Posted Image

#355 Mikesnow

Mikesnow

    Member

  • FW Team Member
  • PipPip
  • 298 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Montgomery, Texas

Posted 29 August 2009 - 01:43 AM

Ran a few vantange on my desktop tonight as well specs are:

E8400 at 3.5ghz and 2 gtx 280's in sli OC to 725mhz core 1591mhz shader and 1225mhz ram

3DMark Vantage : 23623
http://service.futur...re?3dmv=1365366

#356 The Smith

The Smith

    Total Nerd

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4291 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Quebec, Canada

Posted 29 August 2009 - 04:39 AM

Added!


Socket 1366 OC competition - 3DMark Competition - AMD Overclocking Competition
Posted Image
"They should have just called it the Intel Core iAMBROKE." -cirro


#357 Blaise

Blaise

    Distracted

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 481 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 30 August 2009 - 06:45 PM

@ The Smith
I have a question regarding the Vantage benchmark and nVidia cards. Futuremark rules state that the PPU option needs to be disabled for CUDA enabled nVidia cards. I noticed that the scores posted here are performed with the PPU option enabled. Is this fine for this thread? If so, I'd like to submit the result below (as it places me in first :P ):

Vantage PPU enabled
P37588 i7 920 @4021MHz; 2 x GTX 295's (Quad SLi) @685/1477/1180; RAM @1512MHz @7-7-7-17-74-1T
ORB compare link

If not, use this one instead (this would mean a few others would need to re-submit a valid score though :blush: ):

Vantage PPU disabled in both nVidia control panel and Vantage
P30962 i7 920 @3910MHz; 2 x GTX 295's (Quad SLi) @680/1445/1185; RAM @1480MHz 7-7-7-18-74-1T
ORB compare link

on with the rest...

3DMark06
27946 i7 920 @4316MHz HT off; 2 x GTX 295's (Quad SLi) @695/1500/1200
ORB compare link

3DMark05
37419 i7 920 @4380MHz HT off; 2 x GTX 295's (Quad Sli) @695/1500/1190
ORB compare link

3DMark03
132936 i7920 @4252MHz HT off; 2 x GTX 295 (Quad SLi) @685/1175/1475
Posted Image

Edited by Blaise, 30 August 2009 - 10:03 PM.

MSI Eclipse X58 SLI (BIOS:1.C) ● Intel Core i7 930 D0 @4.4GHz 24/7 (Batch 3005F577 03/17/10) ● MSI GTX 295's (Quad SL)
Corsair TR3X6G1600C7 (7-7-7-17-74-1T) ● Thermalright True Black - 120 Extreme (2 x 120mm push-pull) ● Corsair X128 SSD ● Seagate 500GB & 1TB SATA II
Pioneer LS DVD/RW ● Creative Labs X-fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro ● Win 7 HP 64-bit ● Viewsonic VP2130b LCD ● Antec Quattro 1000W ● Lian-Li Armoursuit-X PC-P60


#358 road-runner

road-runner

    Posting Machine

  • Folding Member
  • 11293 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Texas

Posted 30 August 2009 - 06:54 PM

Hwbot does not allow it either...

I7-6900K Asus X99 Deluxe 2 Corsair Vengeance 32Gb Intel 750 400gb  2- 1080ti

 

sigimage.gif


#359 Mikesnow

Mikesnow

    Member

  • FW Team Member
  • PipPip
  • 298 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Montgomery, Texas

Posted 30 August 2009 - 09:11 PM

I noticed that too, and was wondering. However PPU stands for "Physics Processing Unit" I think, and so it's the fact that Nvidia cards are PPU's as well that gets the extra points from the "Physix Test". I am pretty sure it's not CUDA thats getting the extra points as most programs have to be optimized to use that technology, other wise it seems the "CPU Test" would get much higher.

EDIT: Does anyone else find it slightly amusing they build a benchmark to test "Physix" yet don't allow the use of "Physix Processing Units" for the results? LOL Why even have a test for it then.

Edited by Bigfwd69, 30 August 2009 - 09:16 PM.


#360 Blaise

Blaise

    Distracted

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 481 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 30 August 2009 - 10:02 PM

There does seem to be a trick to it though... I normally disable PhysX both in the nVidia control panel and by checking the "Disable PPU" option in Vantage. It appears (from my initial testing at least), that if you disable the PPU it in Vantage alone (acceptable for both ORB and hwbot), you score a bit higher than having it disabled in nVidia's control panel. Maybe... just maybe, the video tests can reap a small but positive benefit from the PPU.

Anyway, seeing as other nVidia users left the PPU active (including the current #1 rank in this thread), I wish to lay claim to his/her position ;)

MSI Eclipse X58 SLI (BIOS:1.C) ● Intel Core i7 930 D0 @4.4GHz 24/7 (Batch 3005F577 03/17/10) ● MSI GTX 295's (Quad SL)
Corsair TR3X6G1600C7 (7-7-7-17-74-1T) ● Thermalright True Black - 120 Extreme (2 x 120mm push-pull) ● Corsair X128 SSD ● Seagate 500GB & 1TB SATA II
Pioneer LS DVD/RW ● Creative Labs X-fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro ● Win 7 HP 64-bit ● Viewsonic VP2130b LCD ● Antec Quattro 1000W ● Lian-Li Armoursuit-X PC-P60