Jump to content


Photo

Amd Tri-core Processor Evaluation


  • Please log in to reply
18 replies to this topic

#1 Nemo

Nemo

    Will Fold 4 Food

  • Honorary Staff
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7228 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Franklin, TN

Posted 22 April 2008 - 08:15 PM

Read about it here - http://www.overclock...phenom_x3_8750/

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 2.83GHz / ASUS P5Q Deluxe / Patriot Extreme Performance 2GB PC2-9600 DDR2-1200MHz / 2x Seagate ST3160827AS 160GB RAID 1 / Seagate ST31000340AS 1TB
Corsair TX750W / Sapphire HD 5870 1GB GDDR5 / SilverStone TJ05 / Scythe Zipang 140mm CPU Cooler / ASUS VH202T-P 20" widescreen monitor (x2) / XP Pro SP 3
"however, i cannot claim to be such a fish as i am not a fish at all..." - hardnrg,Jul 4 2005, 02:49 PM
 

Posted Image

Posted Image

Follow OCC on Posted Image
Subscribe to the OCC Newsletter

Lucky Mudder Race 2013


#2 Kash

Kash

    Long Time Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5491 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Edison, NJ

Posted 22 April 2008 - 08:46 PM

I'm interested to know whether this is a crippled quad or a dual core with another core slapped on.

Pretty impressive performance from AMD here.

Intel i5 2500K | Gigabyte Z68
16GB G.Skill PC3-12800 (9-9-9-24) | EVGA GeForce GTX 560


#3 Bosco

Bosco

    OCC Boss

  • Senior Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 32396 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada

Posted 22 April 2008 - 08:58 PM

I really like the price not bad :)

I still think the Phenom is better performer but this is not bad start for them to get into the game.

Main Gaming Rig
Intel 3960X
MSI X79A-GD65 8D
16GB of Corsair Vengeance
NVIDIA 780TI's in SLI
Corsair Force 3 GT 240GB SSD
Coolermaster 932 Case
Noctua D14 CPU Cooler
Thermaltake Toughpower XT Platinum 1275 Watts
3 X 24" LCD's
Donating to OCC :::: OCC Site Rules :::: OCC Reviews
RIP Verran and Nemo gone but never will be forgotten.


#4 kingdingeling

kingdingeling

    King of the Autobahn

  • Folding Member
  • 10247 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hannover, Germany

Posted 22 April 2008 - 09:07 PM

It continually performed better than its Quad core Phenom brother, big surprise for me!

I guess I have no excuse for not being as awesome as King... - iKillSteal

Seriously, big credit goes out to King for maintaining this list. He puts a lot of work into this thing and he deserves our thanks! - Verran

RIP

| Samsung P480-Pro | Core i3 370M 2.4GHz | 4GB DDR3-1066 | GeForce GT330M | 320GB | 14" |


#5 Bosco

Bosco

    OCC Boss

  • Senior Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 32396 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada

Posted 22 April 2008 - 09:12 PM

I think thats because of the board. The Phenom is not a fan of the 780G for some reason. :(

Main Gaming Rig
Intel 3960X
MSI X79A-GD65 8D
16GB of Corsair Vengeance
NVIDIA 780TI's in SLI
Corsair Force 3 GT 240GB SSD
Coolermaster 932 Case
Noctua D14 CPU Cooler
Thermaltake Toughpower XT Platinum 1275 Watts
3 X 24" LCD's
Donating to OCC :::: OCC Site Rules :::: OCC Reviews
RIP Verran and Nemo gone but never will be forgotten.


#6 Waco

Waco

    Lab Rat 2

  • Reviewer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15404 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Los Alamos, NM

Posted 22 April 2008 - 09:54 PM

I'm interested to know whether this is a crippled quad or a dual core with another core slapped on.

Pretty impressive performance from AMD here.

I'm pretty sure it's a crippled quad.

Even at that...it absolutely destroyed the Intel chips in a few tests at high resolutions. :blink:

sig.png

GTX 770 replaced with watercooled GTX780...but too lazy to change the sig.


#7 Silverfox

Silverfox

    Day of the Testicle

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8271 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Liverpool, UK

Posted 23 April 2008 - 03:00 AM

Seems good, but depending on the price and availability of E8400/Q6600 processors, I'm still wondering if AMD are going to poach much of a market with this. Otherwise, it's a great option for AM2 users with older processors - it's good that finally there is something that can actually compete.

But as I said - with the E8400/Q6600 quite cheap (only a bit more than this tri-core?), and the tri-core not being a great clocker, I suspect many will prefer the Intel route with some crazy clock speeds.

:: T-Class Amp :: BenQ EW2430 :: PulseBox Premium ::

 :: Kef Cresta :: i5 2500 :: HD 6870 :: 16GB RAM ::


#8 jammin

jammin

    e = MC Hammer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6337 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Southampton, UK

Posted 23 April 2008 - 04:53 AM

Yeah, that is still the main thing that is hurting AMD in our market as far as I can see.
The chips seem reasonably competetive when you limit everything to stock speeds, but as soon as you take into account how much more you are likely to get out of an Intel chip at the moment you can see why more people aren't taking the AMD route around here.

For the average, non-overclocked build it still seems like an option worth considering though.

Posted Image
Recommended Power Supplies List - Follow OCC on Posted Image
Custom case - i5 2500K - ASUS Maximus IV Gene-Z - 8GB Mushkin - HD6670 1GB - Corsair AX850 - E-MU 0404 USB


#9 Verran

Verran

    RIP 1981-2009

  • Honorary Staff
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7026 posts
  • Location:Holt, MI

Posted 23 April 2008 - 05:13 AM

Wow! When did Phenom stop sucking? :)

These new AMD chips are actually starting to impress me a bit. They're topping very respectable Intel chips pretty often in recent OCC reviews. Granted the OC numbers are not overly impressive, but at stock speeds they look like a nice competition for Core2.

I'm interested to know whether this is a crippled quad or a dual core with another core slapped on.

Pretty impressive performance from AMD here.

I always assumed they were quads that failed quality checks. What was once trash is now a marketable product by simply disabling the failed core.
Posted Image
[E7400 Gaming]~[Q6600 Burning]~[Opt148 Wife's]~[3200+ HTPC1]~[3500+ HTPC2]
"Thank you for helping us help you help us all."

#10 TechFreak

TechFreak

    Huh? What?

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 177 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cape Cod, MA

Posted 23 April 2008 - 05:21 AM

I always assumed they were quads that failed quality checks. What was once trash is now a marketable product by simply disabling the failed core.


Actually, from what I've read the "50" in the 8750 means it's the new B3 stepping.

#11 Nemo

Nemo

    Will Fold 4 Food

  • Honorary Staff
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7228 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Franklin, TN

Posted 23 April 2008 - 06:43 AM

Actually, from what I've read the "50" in the 8750 means it's the new B3 stepping.

That is true, but the X4 and X3 all use the 50-series nomenclature to denote the B3 stepping that fixed the TLB erratum so users won't confuse them with the original Phenom processors. Lots of folks have speculated about the triple core processors but I am going with Verran on this one. Since AMD quad-core processors all use a single die, this is an innovative way for AMD to increase yields without having to throw away an entire processor. I think a lot lot of people just have a hard time wrapping their mnds around a three-core processor - they're so used to seeing multiples of two.

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 2.83GHz / ASUS P5Q Deluxe / Patriot Extreme Performance 2GB PC2-9600 DDR2-1200MHz / 2x Seagate ST3160827AS 160GB RAID 1 / Seagate ST31000340AS 1TB
Corsair TX750W / Sapphire HD 5870 1GB GDDR5 / SilverStone TJ05 / Scythe Zipang 140mm CPU Cooler / ASUS VH202T-P 20" widescreen monitor (x2) / XP Pro SP 3
"however, i cannot claim to be such a fish as i am not a fish at all..." - hardnrg,Jul 4 2005, 02:49 PM
 

Posted Image

Posted Image

Follow OCC on Posted Image
Subscribe to the OCC Newsletter

Lucky Mudder Race 2013


#12 Puck

Puck

    Lord, what fools these mortals be!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3050 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 23 April 2008 - 07:19 AM

Phenom clock per clock performance has impressed me ever since the B3 TLB fix, and now they are actually very good competition on a level clock playing field...but the intels have a MUCH higher ceiling. Being the same or faster with both chips at 2.2ghz is cool and everything, but when you only hit 2.8-3ghz tops and the opposition is doing 3.4-3.6ghz, you still will get outperformed in the end.

That is not even considering the beastly 4ghz+ E8500 dual cores, which are amazing chips for benchmarking when not having the two extra cores is such a big deal.

The B3 stepping was a pleasant surprise, but not enough to sway my next build from being intel for now. Maybe when they shrink their die again the overclocking headroom will be high enough to warrant purchasing one for a high performance rig. For now they make great budget or casual gamer rigs...but I wouldnt choose one for a benching setup.

-3770k - Asus Sabertooth Z77 - 2X4GB Patriot Viper Extreme - X-Fire'd Sapphire 7970+XFX 7970 - 27" 2560x1440 IPS LED - Dual PSU OCZ Z-Series Z850w Main/OCZ Powerstream 520w Slave - Custom MM Extended Ascension - Logitech G9x/G710+/Homemade Stainless mousepad -

CPU Cooled by: 2x MCP655 pumps, Arqtik TEC Waterblock+2x Arqtik TEC Chillers, 2x modded Bit-Chill Dew Point controllers, 2x Black Ice GTX Gen2 480 Quads, 33x 80cfm 120mm Server fans, Homemade insulated Res on cold side, DD dual bay res w/XSPC Res plug Temp probe hot side*

GPUs Cooled by: Modded MCP655, 2xModded Enzotech Sapphire CPU Waterblocks, Zalman RAMsinks, modded stock plate VRM cooling, Phobya res, Aquacomputer Airplex Modularity 280 Rad

Wow, puck just kinda summed that one up for most of us lol. I agree with puck. :)

Man Puck... I couldn't have said it better myself!

93 Medium Patriot Red Z28 (Goes straight) - 2012 Metallic Spark Black ZX14R (Does Everything)