Intel 45nm 2.66ghz Quad-core Processor Tested |
Don't want to be BANNED? Read the rules!
![]() ![]() |
Intel 45nm 2.66ghz Quad-core Processor Tested |
Apr 14 2008, 01:07 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Will Fold 4 Food ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 6,106 Joined: 10-May 04 From: Franklin, TN Member No.: 10,039 |
Check it out - http://www.overclockersclub.com/reviews/intel_q9450/
-------------------- P4 3.0C/Abit IC7-G/Corsair TWINX1024-3200C2PRO LED/Hitachi 2 x 80 GB SATA RAID 0/Hitachi 120GB SATA/Sapphire HD 3850 512MB /Raidmax Scorpio 868/Vantec Aeroflow/XP Pro SP 2
"however, i cannot claim to be such a fish as i am not a fish at all..." - hardnrg,Jul 4 2005, 02:49 PM ![]() |
|
|
Apr 14 2008, 07:35 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() lvl Infinite Psychopath ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 4,902 Joined: 14-May 04 From: Mount Prospect Member No.: 10,119 |
I would enjoy seeing a head to head performence comparison to a Q6600 G0.
That way most could easily determine if the performence increases over a Q6600 justify the price. A table such as this one would be of great use, but note the table is of a Q9300 VS A Q6600 and it was only one review. ![]() The rule of thumb I use for any direct comparison for two products is if the product being compared shows an average performence increase greater than or equal to it's price percent over the other product, than it is the better buy. Course there is so much that is harder to test for and is not often encorporated into reviews such as energy consumpiton, overclockability and cache benchmarks. This post has been edited by Ste: Apr 14 2008, 07:39 AM -------------------- Logitech G11 Kensington Ci20 SENNHEISER HD555 Sceptre 24' Widescreen PC Power & Cooling 610 Silencer Gigabyte P965 DS3 Q6600 @ Stock 4870 X2 @ Stock 4 GB Representing The Crazies Since 2004 There will come a day, such a day when all will be told more than they wish to know, what one hears may explain the past, it may explain the future, but it has never made a difference either way and it will change nothing. Some day.... But that is not this day, and I don't know when, I just don't know. "Nothing exsists except atoms and empty space; everything else is opinion" ---- Democritus of Abdera |
|
|
Apr 14 2008, 08:09 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() King of the Autobahn ![]() Posts: 9,851 Joined: 4-November 05 From: Hannover, Germany Member No.: 17,834 |
I don't see what you're asking Ste.... The CPU is being tested against the Q6600 in this review, have another look. It's not head to head, but the information you're asking for is all there
-------------------- I guess I have no excuse for not being as awesome as King... - iKillSteal | Samsung Q45 | Core 2 Duo T7250 2.0GHz | 2x2048MB OCZ PC2-5400 CL5 | Intel GMA X3100 | 160GB | 12.1" | || Our Folding@Home Team || | Phenom II X2 550 | DFI Lanparty JR 790GX-M2RS | 4GB A-Data PC2-6400 | XFX HD4890 | 250GB | Corsair TX750W | Antec Mini P180 | |
|
|
Apr 14 2008, 08:46 AM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() OCC Boss ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 27,159 Joined: 27-April 02 From: Canada Member No.: 521 |
He might be asking for overclocked scores from the Q6600.
FYI that is a Go Q6600 that was tested. -------------------- Main Rig
Intel I7 920 MSI X58 Platinum 12 gigs of Mushkin Tri Channel 2 X Nvidia GTX 295 Quad SLI 2 X 1.5 Terabyte Seagate Thermaltake Armour Case 1000 Thermaltake PSU Samsung 30" LCD DIGG OCC! :::: OCC Site Rules :::: OCC Reviews |
|
|
Apr 14 2008, 03:01 PM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() e = MC Hammer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 5,897 Joined: 21-February 04 From: Southampton, UK Member No.: 8,605 |
Does anyone else think one of the more interesting things to come out of this review was the performance of the Phenom for some of the games at high resolutions?
-------------------- ![]() ![]() Recommended Power Supplies List E8400 @ 3.6GHz - DFI Blood Iron P35-T2RL - 4GB Patriot Viper Fin - HD 4850 512MB - X-Fi Xtreme Music |
|
|
Apr 14 2008, 08:56 PM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() I'm a thread killer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 5,097 Joined: 11-December 04 From: Costa Mesa, CA Member No.: 14,086 |
That was actually one of the things that really surprised me. I haven't seen AMD beat Intel in much of anything lately, so it was kind of like something straight out of left field.
-------------------- :: DIGG OCC! :: OCC Rules :: OCC Gaming :: ![]() Intel Core2Quad Q6600 | Foxconn MARS P35 4GB G.Skill PC2-6400 (5-5-5-15) | ATI Radeon HD4850 2x 74GB Raptors | 750GB | 1TB Sound Blaster Audigy2 ZS | Antec P180B Macbook Core2Duo 2GHz 3GB RAM 250GB HDD |
|
|
Apr 14 2008, 09:10 PM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() OCC Boss ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 27,159 Joined: 27-April 02 From: Canada Member No.: 521 |
Ya for some reason that game takes to AMD kinda of like 3dmark sometimes
-------------------- Main Rig
Intel I7 920 MSI X58 Platinum 12 gigs of Mushkin Tri Channel 2 X Nvidia GTX 295 Quad SLI 2 X 1.5 Terabyte Seagate Thermaltake Armour Case 1000 Thermaltake PSU Samsung 30" LCD DIGG OCC! :::: OCC Site Rules :::: OCC Reviews |
|
|
Apr 15 2008, 06:16 AM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() e = MC Hammer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 5,897 Joined: 21-February 04 From: Southampton, UK Member No.: 8,605 |
It wasn't just one game was it (though the company of heroes results are interesting)
The Phenom managed to put out higher numbers @ 1900x1200 for 4 / 7 games tested. Sure, the margins weren't huge but it still surprsied me. This post has been edited by jammin: Apr 15 2008, 06:17 AM -------------------- ![]() ![]() Recommended Power Supplies List E8400 @ 3.6GHz - DFI Blood Iron P35-T2RL - 4GB Patriot Viper Fin - HD 4850 512MB - X-Fi Xtreme Music |
|
|
May 13 2008, 03:07 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
New Member Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 13-May 08 Member No.: 32,327 |
what are the tweaks done for 450 x 8??
("450 x 8came easily with 1.30 volts on the core and a tweak to the northbridge and FSB voltages to add some stability.) |
|
|
May 13 2008, 03:56 PM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Chronic Haggler... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 14,172 Joined: 20-May 05 From: The fields... Member No.: 32,143 |
Just curious why compare the 9450 to a Q6600 when a better speed comparison would be the Q6700 as they are both 2.66ghz in speed...?
MaximumPC did a review on Q9300 vs. the Q6600 and the Q9300 won on almost all accounts... I would have rather went with a Q9450 myself as my 1st Intel Quad build but I chose the Q6700 simply for price.. -------------------- |
|
|
May 13 2008, 04:09 PM
Post
#11
|
|
![]() The more i teach the dumber i get! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 7,394 Joined: 10-August 03 Member No.: 5,490 |
Old school versus new school. Plus no Q6700 on hand! Did have the 9770 though. The Q6600 is still a tremendous value at 200 bones but the OC results from some of the latest chips have been less than stellar. Dont get me wrong some still do clock well just not like they did from the initial release of the GO stepping chips.
-------------------- Processor Intel Core I7 920 x2, I7 965 and more
Memory Mushkin PC3 12800 7-7-7-20 Motherboard MSI X58 Eclipse SLI Graphics Yes I have them all SLI and CrossfireX Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower 1200, Mushkin 800 Monitor Gateway UXD3000 Water Cooling By DangerDen |
|
|
May 13 2008, 04:18 PM
Post
#12
|
|
![]() Chronic Haggler... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 14,172 Joined: 20-May 05 From: The fields... Member No.: 32,143 |
Old school versus new school. Plus no Q6700 on hand! Did have the 9770 though. The Q6600 is still a tremendous value at 200 bones but the OC results from some of the latest chips have been less than stellar. Dont get me wrong some still do clock well just not like they did from the initial release of the GO stepping chips. sweet....was just curious man.... So far I am really liking my Q6700 running 300x10 at 1.19v right now and breezing along.... once I get the case review done and I mod the case (will post case log) so I can actually keep the board installed I am going to lean pretty hard on this chip.... -------------------- |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st November 2009 - 06:13 AM |