Jump to content


Photo

OCC Reviews the Mushkin 4GB (2 x 2GB) XP2-6400 Memory


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 road-runner

road-runner

    Posting Machine

  • Folding Member
  • 10737 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Texas

Posted 29 October 2007 - 09:36 PM

OCC Reviews the Mushkin 4GB (2 x 2GB) XP2-6400 Memory

Posted Image



sigimage.gif


#2 cchalogamer

cchalogamer

    Folding is good :)

  • Folding Member
  • 4707 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NC (USA)

Posted 29 October 2007 - 10:46 PM

Task Manager: This Windows application is used to monitor your system's performance. I'm looking at it to see just how much of the RAM Windows is recognizing. Windows XP Professional only recognizes up to 3GB of RAM, but it can utilize the whole 4 gigabytes.

Wait what...care to explain that logic?

Actually I'll just link to the easy version over at the Crucial site FAQ, I was going to link to Mushkin's version but apparently they dont get many questions...

http://www.crucial.c...r.aspx?qid=4251

1zdcjtx.png

i7-4930K/GA-X79-UP4/32GB G.Skill & Team Vulcan Mixed/512GB Crucial M550 SSD/240GB Seagate 600 SSD/3TB/R9 290X/GTX 750Ti/Rosewill Capstone 750 (main rig)

i7-4770K/GA-Z87X-UD5H/16GB ADATA/240GB Seagate 600 SSD/3TB/2 x 1TB RAID 1/1.5TB/GTX 670/Rosewill Capstone 750-M (secondary location main rig)

i7-4810MQ/Sager N8258-S/16GB/120GB mSATA/2 x 1TB/GTX 880M/180W AC Adapter w/8 cell battery (gaming laptop)

i5-4300Y/Dell Venue 11 Pro/8GB/256GB/Intel HD 4200 (GT2)/25W Ac Adapter w/removable 2 cell battery (Win 8 Pro Tablet)

i5-3570K/GA-Z77X-UD5H/16GB Kingston HyperX/500GB/3 x 2TB/2 x 320GB RAID 1/Antec BP550 (server)


#3 DaddyD302

DaddyD302

    New Member

  • Members
  • 46 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milwaukee

Posted 30 October 2007 - 05:01 AM

Wait what...care to explain that logic?

Actually I'll just link to the easy version over at the Crucial site FAQ, I was going to link to Mushkin's version but apparently they dont get many questions...

http://www.crucial.c...r.aspx?qid=4251



I was wondering the same thing.

Main PC 
[Intel i7 3920K] [Asus RIVE] [EVGA 670 FTW SLI] [Corsair Vengeance 1866 16G] [Samsung 840 Pro 256G + WD RE4 2TB Raid 0] [CM Storm Trooper] [Cosair AX1200] [Corsair H100i] [Dell U2412M] 
Backup PC 
[EVGA X58 FTW] [INTEL i7 950@4] [EVGA 570 classified SLI] [Mushkin Blackline 12G] [WD RE4 2TB Raid 0] [CoolerMaster HAF-X] [Enermax Revolution85+ 1050W] [Corsair H70] [Asus VG236]


#4 Waco

Waco

    Lab Rat 2

  • Reviewer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15459 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Los Alamos, NM

Posted 30 October 2007 - 01:24 PM

Wait what...care to explain that logic?

He just needs to add "of address space" to the end of that sentence. Those of us with video cards/sound cards/etc that use large amount of addressing space will have even less space for physical RAM on a 32 bit system.

sig.png

GTX 770 replaced with watercooled GTX780...but too lazy to change the sig.


#5 cchalogamer

cchalogamer

    Folding is good :)

  • Folding Member
  • 4707 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NC (USA)

Posted 30 October 2007 - 02:06 PM

Adding that would work. Though I dont think that would be very clear to most people. Heck i'm not even sure most people understand the concept in the crucial link/your post.

1zdcjtx.png

i7-4930K/GA-X79-UP4/32GB G.Skill & Team Vulcan Mixed/512GB Crucial M550 SSD/240GB Seagate 600 SSD/3TB/R9 290X/GTX 750Ti/Rosewill Capstone 750 (main rig)

i7-4770K/GA-Z87X-UD5H/16GB ADATA/240GB Seagate 600 SSD/3TB/2 x 1TB RAID 1/1.5TB/GTX 670/Rosewill Capstone 750-M (secondary location main rig)

i7-4810MQ/Sager N8258-S/16GB/120GB mSATA/2 x 1TB/GTX 880M/180W AC Adapter w/8 cell battery (gaming laptop)

i5-4300Y/Dell Venue 11 Pro/8GB/256GB/Intel HD 4200 (GT2)/25W Ac Adapter w/removable 2 cell battery (Win 8 Pro Tablet)

i5-3570K/GA-Z77X-UD5H/16GB Kingston HyperX/500GB/3 x 2TB/2 x 320GB RAID 1/Antec BP550 (server)


#6 TNeed4Speed

TNeed4Speed

    New Member

  • Members
  • 3 posts

Posted 30 October 2007 - 03:59 PM

B:) Greetings!

The 996557 edition is quite advanced and VERY flexible.
This one set can eliminate any controversy about DDR2 6400 ram.

My test projects lead to more than a 40% increase in application efficiency - better than any other 4GB set.

Be advised the 996557 edition can do more with less power overall and can make you a happy camper - overnight.

If you are truly interested in more complete results just reply.
You'll be amazed at the results.

Best regards,

TNeed4Speed :D