OCC Reviews the Mushkin 4GB (2 x 2GB) XP2-6400 Memory

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Don't want to be BANNED? Read the rules!

OCC Reviews the Mushkin 4GB (2 x 2GB) XP2-6400 Memory

road-runner View Member Profile Find Member's Posts	Oct 29 2007, 09:36 PM Post #1
Posting Nut Group: Donated Posts: 9,587 Joined: 5-October 03 From: Texas Member No.: 6,351	OCC Reviews the Mushkin 4GB (2 x 2GB) XP2-6400 Memory --------------------

cchalogamer View Member Profile Find Member's Posts	Oct 29 2007, 10:46 PM Post #2
Folding is good :) Group: Folding Member Posts: 4,344 Joined: 21-June 04 From: NC (USA) Member No.: 10,771	QUOTE Task Manager: This Windows application is used to monitor your system's performance. I'm looking at it to see just how much of the RAM Windows is recognizing. Windows XP Professional only recognizes up to 3GB of RAM, but it can utilize the whole 4 gigabytes. Wait what...care to explain that logic? Actually I'll just link to the easy version over at the Crucial site FAQ, I was going to link to Mushkin's version but apparently they dont get many questions... http://www.crucial.com/kb/answer.aspx?qid=4251 -------------------- My Folding Q6600 @3.6+/EVGA 122-CK-NF68-T1/8GB PC2-8000/1TB 7200.11/500GB 7200.11/GTX 260 SLI/Silverstone OP650(Main rig) Phenom 9550 X4 @ 2.5/Crosshair II Formula/2GB Ballistix PC2-6400/250GB/3x9600GSO/CMPSU-650TX (F@H Rig) Opteron 165 @2.7+ghz/EPoX EP-9NPA+Ultra/2GB G.Skill PC3200(2x1GB)/320GBx2 RAID 1/500GBx2 RAID 1/40GBx2/8800GT/500w (server) E8400 @4.0+/GA-EP45-UD3P/2GB Ballistix PC2-5300/250GB/4870 512MB/500w (work rig) T9300 2.5/4GB PC2-5300/2x320GB RAID 0/8800M GTS 512MB (Laptop, Gateway P-6860FX) T6400 2.0/4GB PC2-6400/250GB/9300M 512MB (Laptop, ASUS X83V) Atom 330/D945GCLF2/2GB PC2-5300 KVR/160GB/90w picoPSU

DaddyD302 View Member Profile Find Member's Posts	Oct 30 2007, 05:01 AM Post #3
New Member Group: Members Posts: 44 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Milwaukee Member No.: 988	QUOTE(cchalogamer @ Oct 30 2007, 01:46 AM) [snapback]730562[/snapback] Wait what...care to explain that logic? Actually I'll just link to the easy version over at the Crucial site FAQ, I was going to link to Mushkin's version but apparently they dont get many questions... http://www.crucial.com/kb/answer.aspx?qid=4251 I was wondering the same thing. -------------------- EVGA X58 INTEL i7 920@3.8Ghz EVGA 260GTX 216 SLI Corsair Dominators DDR3 1600 Samsung F1 750G Raid0 Enermax Revolution 1050 Gateway 2485 CM HAF932 X-Fi Elite CM V8

Waco View Member Profile Find Member's Posts	Oct 30 2007, 01:24 PM Post #4
Audio Nut Group: Folding Member Posts: 6,678 Joined: 14-February 04 From: Clemson U. Member No.: 8,484	QUOTE(cchalogamer @ Oct 30 2007, 06:46 AM) [snapback]730562[/snapback] Wait what...care to explain that logic? He just needs to add "of address space" to the end of that sentence. Those of us with video cards/sound cards/etc that use large amount of addressing space will have even less space for physical RAM on a 32 bit system. -------------------- Desktop: \| Q6600 @ 3.2 GHz \| 128 GB GSkill Falcon \| 8 GB WinTec AmpX \| Sapphire 4870 X2 \| DFI P35-T2RL \| PCP&C Silencer 610 \| W7 x64 \| HTPC: \| X3 720 BE @ 3.4 GHz \| 4.5 TB Storage \| 8 GB GeIL Black Dragon \| PowerColor 4830 \| ECS A-780GM-A \| ATI Theater 650 Pro \| OCZ Fatal1ty 550 \| W7 x64 \| Router/VPN/Compiling: \| Opteron 175 \| 4 GB DDR 500 \| S3 Trio PCI VGA \| Asus A8N-SLI SE \| SinTek 500SLI \| XP Pro \| Office: \| Dell Precision 390 \| Core 2 Duo E6320 \| 2 GB DDR2 667 \| XFX 7800GT \| Fedora 10 / Windows 7 RC \| NetBook: \| Asus EeePC 900A \| 1.6 GHz Atom \| 32 GB SSD \| 2 GB DDR2 667 \| Intel Integrated \| W7 x86 \|

cchalogamer View Member Profile Find Member's Posts	Oct 30 2007, 02:06 PM Post #5
Folding is good :) Group: Folding Member Posts: 4,344 Joined: 21-June 04 From: NC (USA) Member No.: 10,771	Adding that would work. Though I dont think that would be very clear to most people. Heck i'm not even sure most people understand the concept in the crucial link/your post. -------------------- My Folding Q6600 @3.6+/EVGA 122-CK-NF68-T1/8GB PC2-8000/1TB 7200.11/500GB 7200.11/GTX 260 SLI/Silverstone OP650(Main rig) Phenom 9550 X4 @ 2.5/Crosshair II Formula/2GB Ballistix PC2-6400/250GB/3x9600GSO/CMPSU-650TX (F@H Rig) Opteron 165 @2.7+ghz/EPoX EP-9NPA+Ultra/2GB G.Skill PC3200(2x1GB)/320GBx2 RAID 1/500GBx2 RAID 1/40GBx2/8800GT/500w (server) E8400 @4.0+/GA-EP45-UD3P/2GB Ballistix PC2-5300/250GB/4870 512MB/500w (work rig) T9300 2.5/4GB PC2-5300/2x320GB RAID 0/8800M GTS 512MB (Laptop, Gateway P-6860FX) T6400 2.0/4GB PC2-6400/250GB/9300M 512MB (Laptop, ASUS X83V) Atom 330/D945GCLF2/2GB PC2-5300 KVR/160GB/90w picoPSU

TNeed4Speed View Member Profile Find Member's Posts	Oct 30 2007, 03:59 PM Post #6
New Member Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 15-October 07 Member No.: 26,378	Greetings! The 996557 edition is quite advanced and VERY flexible. This one set can eliminate any controversy about DDR2 6400 ram. My test projects lead to more than a 40% increase in application efficiency - better than any other 4GB set. Be advised the 996557 edition can do more with less power overall and can make you a happy camper - overnight. If you are truly interested in more complete results just reply. You'll be amazed at the results. Best regards, TNeed4Speed

Display Mode: Standard · Switch to: Linear+ · Switch to: Outline

Time is now: 21st November 2009 - 07:37 PM