AMD A10 5800 & A8 5600 Desktop APU Reviewed
#1
Posted 02 October 2012 - 06:59 PM
http://www.overclock...d_a_series_apu/
Intel 2600K @ 4.8
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution
16GB of Corsair Vengeance
NVIDIA GTX 690
Corsair Force 3 GT 240GB SSD
Corsair 600T
H100 Cooling
Corsair AX1200 PSU
3 X 24" LCD's in Surround
Support OCC :::: Donating to OCC :::: DIGG OCC! :::: OCC Site Rules :::: OCC Reviews
RIP Verran gone but never will be forgotten.
#2
Posted 02 October 2012 - 07:07 PM
It looks like a good improvement in GPU power but a not so good improvement over Llano in terms of CPU power. I was expecting more from Piledriver I guess.

Booyah.
#3
Posted 02 October 2012 - 07:22 PM
I was expecting more from Piledriver I guess.
Seems to be the buzzword when it comes to AMDs new CPU releases
The Hive
i7 3930k @ 5GHz 24/7 32Gb Corsair Dominator @ 1866MHz
Asus Rampage IV Extreme 3x EVGA 670 FTW @ 1300MHz Core boost
256Gb Crucial M4 - Boot Drive 4x2Tb HDD Raid 5 - Data Storage
CPU, Motherboard, GPU and RAM watercooled by MIPS and Heatkiller
Heavily Modified XSPC Cube Case
#4
Posted 02 October 2012 - 08:24 PM
Any idea if the power consumption has dropped like AMD has been trumpeting? It looks like a good improvement in GPU power but a not so good improvement over Llano in terms of CPU power. I was expecting more from Piledriver I guess.
Yes it does seem to be down on power a good bit 20% +/- when the CPU is loaded. The GPU does use a bit more under load, but It seems a good trade off for the increased graphics power. The A10-5700 has the same 384 shader cores and 4.0GHz turbo in a 65w package
@ Macho, I think it may be a Bios update or two to get the verdict on the L3-less version of pile driver. The single threaded seems to be a bit better overall.
2.2kW Holodeck VII 
[email protected]/Gigabyte GA-990-FXA-UD7 (rev 1.1)/16GB Corsair Dominator Platinum 2133 MHz/4 X HD 7970 Quadfire / 1x Corsiar AX1200W/2x FSP Group X5 1000W/1XNexXxos XT45 360mm/2 x NexXxos XT45 240mm/1xNexXxos XT45 120mm Rads/ 3 X VPP-655 Pumps/ Koolance 370 CPU Block/ Heatkiller GPU X-3 Waterblocks/ Rad Fans Coolermaster Excaliber/Bitspower & Monsoon Fittings/Primochill Tubing/ Case CoolerMaster Cosmos 2/Heatkiller X-3 Multilink Quad Bridge/BitsPower Z-Multi 250mML Reservoir/ Eyefinity 3+1 Extended 5760 x 1080-25" Monitors
#5
Posted 02 October 2012 - 11:12 PM
What is like the performance with dual graphics like?
Maybe slot in a 7750 in there and try?
Case: CoolerMaster Elite 330
PSU: CoolerMaster Silent PRO 700 Modular
CPU: i5 650 - @3.6; stock cooler
MoBo: Gigabyte P55A-UD3
RAM: Kingston 2x4GB @ 1600 9-9-9-24
GPU: ATI HD5830 1GB
HDD: 5 discs totaling 3.08TB(one of these is +7 years old and still kicking)
Monitor: BenQ 22in LED FullHD
#6
Posted 03 October 2012 - 12:13 AM
CPU: Intel i5 3570K
Motherboard: Gigabyte Z77X-UD4H
Graphics: EVGA GTX 670
Memory: 8Gb Patriot Intel Extreme Masters 1866 Mhz
Sound: Asus Xonar DX & Roccat Kave 5.1
Storage: Crucial M4 128 GB / Western Digital 1 Tb Black
CPU Cooler: Antec Kuhler 620
PSU: Seasonic X Series 660Watt
KBD, Mouse & Case: CM Storm Trigger, Roccat Kone Pure & Cooler Master 690 II Advanced
#7
Posted 03 October 2012 - 02:03 AM

Man these spammers are geniuses...put (NO SPAM) in the thread title to hide the spam. It's brilliant. Hopefully this doesn't catch on...what if rapists wear signs that say (NOT A RAPIST)? They will be raping everybody! D:
#8
Posted 03 October 2012 - 11:48 PM
I was expecting more from Piledriver I guess.
What's wrong with AMD for the past one and half years?

#9
Posted 04 October 2012 - 05:32 AM
#10
Posted 04 October 2012 - 08:14 AM
Don't see why most reviews on other sites put Trinity down, for the price it's amazing and performs everything that it was designed for, I'd call that a major success. Not everyday you get a good quad core and a great igpu in the same package.
Its not the price, but its the performance which matters most.

#11
Posted 04 October 2012 - 08:30 AM
Its not the price, but its the performance which matters most.
Not really, at least to the average consumer which is the majority
#12
Posted 04 October 2012 - 09:31 AM
The problem is for roughly the same up-front cost (or very slightly more) you can get an Intel platform that performs better and uses less power...Not really, at least to the average consumer which is the majority
And they perform very well.

Booyah.













