OCC Reviews a Pair of AMD A75 Chipset Boards from Gigabyte
#1
Posted 09 May 2012 - 03:27 AM
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 2.83GHz / ASUS P5Q Deluxe / Patriot Extreme Performance 2GB PC2-9600 DDR2-1200MHz / 2x Seagate ST3160827AS 160GB RAID 1 / Seagate ST31000340AS 1TB
Corsair TX750W / Sapphire HD 5870 1GB GDDR5 / SilverStone TJ05 / Scythe Zipang 140mm CPU Cooler / ASUS VH202T-P 20" widescreen monitor (x2) / XP Pro SP 3
"however, i cannot claim to be such a fish as i am not a fish at all..." - hardnrg,Jul 4 2005, 02:49 PM

#2
Posted 09 May 2012 - 04:03 AM
Might need to check out an APU set up with one of these boards in the future. My brother and sisters old computers need an upgrade.
Need to get my sister off her MacBook and my brother off his iPad. It's not right keeping them away from windows

Man these spammers are geniuses...put (NO SPAM) in the thread title to hide the spam. It's brilliant. Hopefully this doesn't catch on...what if rapists wear signs that say (NOT A RAPIST)? They will be raping everybody! D:
#3
Posted 09 May 2012 - 04:26 AM
Get your GEEK on ever week with Computer Ed Radio
http://computeredradio.com http://facebook.com/computered
#4
Posted 09 May 2012 - 05:14 AM
Pretty solid reviews. I have the Gigabyte A75M-UDH2 here with a A8-3870k and its a pretty sweet board. Although it did seem to be pretty finicky with ram selection it did finally settle down and play nice. I did flash teh BIOS to the latest as that was recommended for the 3870k to work properly but I had no issue on the as shipped BIOS.
I neither have been a fan of Gigabyte's software. I have been using Gigabyte boards since the inception of the Socket A CPUs. I started off with the 7N400pro and then had their flagship 7NNXP which was the Cadillac of boards. None of the Easy-Tune software worked correctly and I dont think has since then.
They make some great boards and I have been very pleased with them but I agree their software leave a little room for improvement.....
Commodore64....playing Crysis on high

**Noctua Owners Club: Member #2 - NH-D14**
#5
Posted 09 May 2012 - 10:19 AM
Red the one thing I wish you would have done is show the performance with a 6670 or 6570 using the hybrid crossfire. You actually get a pretty solid little gaming system for a $75 video card.
Is is a very good idea for cheap gaming system.
Another great review.
P.S. I hate that BIOS. It took my memory back by 2 years.

#6
Posted 09 May 2012 - 10:43 AM

Booyah.
#7
Posted 09 May 2012 - 11:07 AM
Commodore64....playing Crysis on high

**Noctua Owners Club: Member #2 - NH-D14**
#8
Posted 09 May 2012 - 11:57 AM
Get your GEEK on ever week with Computer Ed Radio
http://computeredradio.com http://facebook.com/computered
#9
Posted 09 May 2012 - 02:02 PM
I have to agree with Waco, the UEFI looks really cool but I perfer a plain old BIOS. You know I always wondered why they went with a GUI for the BIOS. I mean even most techs are in it once or twice when they setup a system and that's it. Most other people NEVER get into it. The only people regularly using it knew thier way around just fine. Who needed a dumbed down look for the BIOS?
I think I can answer tha with relative confidence. Years ago there was an attitude that over-clocking was not only dangerous, harder to do, but 'cheating' Check this out from Tom's Hardware in 1997.
http://www.tomshardw...guide,15-3.html
Now everything comes unlocked and advertised as 'Overclockable', most of the time its the main feature. It seems natural that board-makers would make the BIOS a more hospitable place to operate in to take advantage of the main selling point (or at least a major one)
While showing a customer his new machine a few years ago I entered the BIOS and he volunteered " I stay out of here....It looks like a place where a lot of damage can be done." .....I don't think he would have any problem trying out the UEFI BIOS.
With OC'ing being the sport it now is, even if some are still nervous about "messing with things" , they can use the 'Auto-Overclock' and get the thrill of OC'ing and all but eliminate the risk.
.Red the one thing I wish you would have done is show the performance with a 6670 or 6570 using the hybrid crossfire. You actually get a pretty solid little gaming system for a $75 video card
I wanted to see the numbers on that as well. If I had one of the approved cards for hybrid, I would have run it.
2.2kW Holodeck VII 
[email protected]/Gigabyte GA-990-FXA-UD7 (rev 1.1)/16GB Corsair Dominator Platinum 2133 MHz/4 X HD 7970 Quadfire / 1x Corsiar AX1200W/2x FSP Group X5 1000W/1XNexXxos XT45 360mm/2 x NexXxos XT45 240mm/1xNexXxos XT45 120mm Rads/ 3 X VPP-655 Pumps/ Koolance 370 CPU Block/ Heatkiller GPU X-3 Waterblocks/ Rad Fans Coolermaster Excaliber/Bitspower & Monsoon Fittings/Primochill Tubing/ Case CoolerMaster Cosmos 2/Heatkiller X-3 Multilink Quad Bridge/BitsPower Z-Multi 250mML Reservoir/ Eyefinity 3+1 Extended 5760 x 1080-25" Monitors
#10
Posted 09 May 2012 - 02:45 PM

Booyah.
#11
Posted 10 May 2012 - 07:30 AM
I have to agree with Waco, the UEFI looks really cool but I perfer a plain old BIOS. You know I always wondered why they went with a GUI for the BIOS. I mean even most techs are in it once or twice when they setup a system and that's it. Most other people NEVER get into it. The only people regularly using it knew thier way around just fine. Who needed a dumbed down look for the BIOS?
I think the answer could be like this. Making BIOS user friendly and thus taking out the 'basic' part of BIOS.
UEFI BIOS looks good, but hard to adapt IMO. At first when I saw UEFI BIOS demo I was like wtf? Is it BIOS or any other thing? On the brighter side here we are with highest number of overclockers, worldwide, specially thanks to UEFI BIOS.
















