Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

...


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1 Disparaitre

Disparaitre

    Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 699 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 12 April 2012 - 05:12 PM

...


Edited by Disparaitre, 21 September 2014 - 09:30 AM.


#2 Rofltroll

Rofltroll

    Kowalski! Options!

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 439 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Romania

Posted 12 April 2012 - 05:41 PM

Quite frankly you won't see any real world difference. I actually just had a course on structure of computer systems at university about memories. The main differences between DDR2 and DDR3 in performance is mainly that DDR3 consumes less power (1.65V). The frequency is higher in DDR3 but the timings are also greater which kind of evens out. between C7 and 1066 and C9 1600 , C9 1600 is somewhat faster but you won't see absolutely any difference in games. 1866 memory isn't worth the 10-20$ in my opinion, especially for games. I dare someone to prove me wrong.

mobo: Gigabyte X58 UD3R.
CPU: i7 920 @ 3.4 GHz 1.2v. == Chilled by Titan Fenrir Evo ==
video: Inno3D nVidia GTX 470 @ 775/1550/1775.
RAM: OCZ Gold 2x2GB @ 1440 CL7 1.65v.
HDD: Cheap-O HDD.
PSU: Corsair 650TX.
case: NZXT Hades.


#3 Disparaitre

Disparaitre

    Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 699 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 12 April 2012 - 08:44 PM

...


Edited by Disparaitre, 21 September 2014 - 06:48 AM.


#4 Rofltroll

Rofltroll

    Kowalski! Options!

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 439 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Romania

Posted 13 April 2012 - 12:24 AM

I suggest going for the 1600 C7. Those numbers are given by manufacturers and they represent the manufacturer's guarantee that they will run at those given parameters. You could overclock the 1066 ones but the chance that they will go to C9 at 1600 is greater and there is little guarantee that they will achieve 1600 MHz and C7. 1600 C7 is great for gaming right now but you won't really see much of a difference between 1066 and 1600 in games really. I say go for the 1600 ones. (you will have to enter bios to overclock your ram to those specifications since the mobo will set the ram at a different speed. My OCZ 1600 for example was set to 1066 by default so i had to tweak it).

mobo: Gigabyte X58 UD3R.
CPU: i7 920 @ 3.4 GHz 1.2v. == Chilled by Titan Fenrir Evo ==
video: Inno3D nVidia GTX 470 @ 775/1550/1775.
RAM: OCZ Gold 2x2GB @ 1440 CL7 1.65v.
HDD: Cheap-O HDD.
PSU: Corsair 650TX.
case: NZXT Hades.


#5 Waco

Waco

    Lab Rat 2

  • Reviewer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15455 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Los Alamos, NM

Posted 13 April 2012 - 09:05 AM

The difference is going to be small regardless. Just buy whatever you like. :P

sig.png

GTX 770 replaced with watercooled GTX780...but too lazy to change the sig.


#6 Disparaitre

Disparaitre

    Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 699 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 13 April 2012 - 11:05 AM

...


Edited by Disparaitre, 21 September 2014 - 06:48 AM.


#7 Waco

Waco

    Lab Rat 2

  • Reviewer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15455 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Los Alamos, NM

Posted 13 April 2012 - 12:00 PM

Expensive RAM is almost always a waste of money...just grab some CAS 9 1600 for cheap.

sig.png

GTX 770 replaced with watercooled GTX780...but too lazy to change the sig.


#8 Rofltroll

Rofltroll

    Kowalski! Options!

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 439 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Romania

Posted 13 April 2012 - 12:50 PM

I agree with buying 1600 MHz CAS 9. How much ram does that 4250 eat up? If it eats up 1GB of ram, then maybe 8 GB RAM won't be such a bad idea. Otherwise i suggest you stick to 4 GB if you only plan on playing TF2 really :)

mobo: Gigabyte X58 UD3R.
CPU: i7 920 @ 3.4 GHz 1.2v. == Chilled by Titan Fenrir Evo ==
video: Inno3D nVidia GTX 470 @ 775/1550/1775.
RAM: OCZ Gold 2x2GB @ 1440 CL7 1.65v.
HDD: Cheap-O HDD.
PSU: Corsair 650TX.
case: NZXT Hades.


#9 boinker

boinker

    Im a Watchin you......

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3302 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Del Sity, Oklahoma

Posted 15 April 2012 - 12:44 AM

Expensive RAM is almost always a waste of money...just grab some CAS 9 1600 for cheap.


I can attest to that. I hated my corsair dominator ddr3 1866. Love.my.mushkin ddr3 1333 that runs around 1600mhz all day long.

"It works Because I threatened it. :lol:" - " did you show it the sledgehammer" - "No, A flight of stairs"
"I don't want to be much of a forum Nazi but this situation calls for a hail Bosco and blitzkrieg someone".

If that does not work I hop in a Madcat and Blast it to microscopic Particles.


#10 Disparaitre

Disparaitre

    Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 699 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 15 April 2012 - 05:55 AM

...


Edited by Disparaitre, 21 September 2014 - 06:48 AM.


#11 Waco

Waco

    Lab Rat 2

  • Reviewer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15455 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Los Alamos, NM

Posted 15 April 2012 - 06:44 AM

You're not going to see much of a difference at all. Even Llano chips only see a few percent at most going from very slow to very fast RAM. The 4250 isn't a speed demon no matter what you do, overclocking it will get you a lot more than any RAM will.

sig.png

GTX 770 replaced with watercooled GTX780...but too lazy to change the sig.


#12 Disparaitre

Disparaitre

    Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 699 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 15 April 2012 - 09:20 AM

...


Edited by Disparaitre, 21 September 2014 - 06:47 AM.