OCZ RevoDrive 3 X2 240 GB PCIe SSD Reviewed
#1
Posted 01 December 2011 - 03:28 AM
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 2.83GHz / ASUS P5Q Deluxe / Patriot Extreme Performance 2GB PC2-9600 DDR2-1200MHz / 2x Seagate ST3160827AS 160GB RAID 1 / Seagate ST31000340AS 1TB
Corsair TX750W / Sapphire HD 5870 1GB GDDR5 / SilverStone TJ05 / Scythe Zipang 140mm CPU Cooler / ASUS VH202T-P 20" widescreen monitor (x2) / XP Pro SP 3
"however, i cannot claim to be such a fish as i am not a fish at all..." - hardnrg,Jul 4 2005, 02:49 PM

#2
Posted 01 December 2011 - 08:18 AM
Current System
[CPU]Intel Xeon W3670 (i7-970) @3.20Ghz---[CPU Cooling]Thermalright Silver Arrow---[MOBO]ASUS Rampage Gene III---[RAM]G-Skill Rip Jaws (24GB)(6x4GB)---[GPU]Gigabyte Radeon HD 6950 OC---[PSU]KingWin Lazar LZ-1000---[CASE]Bitfenix Colossus Venom Edition---[HDDs]WD Dives(6.5TB total storage) and Crucial 128GB SSD(boot)---[Monitors] 3X NEC 24" LCD2490WUXi ISP Panels
PC 2.0 Audio System (Speakers) Triad InRoom Mini Pair - (Receiver) Marantz SR-4400 (Power Conditioning) - UltraPower PGX-500
My 5.2 Room Theater System (Speakers) B&W CDM 1NT Pair --- (Center) B&W CNT --- (Sub) 2X Polk Audio PSW Series PSW10 --- (Receiver) Rotel RSX-1057 --- (Power Conditioning) UltraPower PGX-500
#3
Posted 01 December 2011 - 08:22 AM
If you're interested in some incredible performance from your storage device, you need to check out the OCZ RevoDrive 3 X2 240 GB - http://www.overclock...ive_3_x2_240gb/
This could be the begining of a whole new wave of Storage Drives. Helping to breakdown the High $$ of SSD.
Silverstone Raven 2 case---Corsair Silent Pro 1200ex PSU
Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H--Intel i5-2500k @4.2ghz
Mushkin-Redline 2x4gig @1833 8-9-8-24, Noctua NH-D14
Evga GTX 680----LG Blu-Ray Combo Optical Drive
Creative Fatality Pro X-Fi---Creative Z2300 2.1 200watt Spkrs
Crucial M4 SATA 3 128g SSD--1tb-Samsung SATA 3 HDD
Planar 27" HDMI-Monitor 1920x1080
#4
Posted 01 December 2011 - 08:24 AM
This could be the begining of a whole new wave of Storage Drives. Helping to breakdown the High $$ of SSD.
Why? It's like 4 times more expense then a Sata SSD.
Current System
[CPU]Intel Xeon W3670 (i7-970) @3.20Ghz---[CPU Cooling]Thermalright Silver Arrow---[MOBO]ASUS Rampage Gene III---[RAM]G-Skill Rip Jaws (24GB)(6x4GB)---[GPU]Gigabyte Radeon HD 6950 OC---[PSU]KingWin Lazar LZ-1000---[CASE]Bitfenix Colossus Venom Edition---[HDDs]WD Dives(6.5TB total storage) and Crucial 128GB SSD(boot)---[Monitors] 3X NEC 24" LCD2490WUXi ISP Panels
PC 2.0 Audio System (Speakers) Triad InRoom Mini Pair - (Receiver) Marantz SR-4400 (Power Conditioning) - UltraPower PGX-500
My 5.2 Room Theater System (Speakers) B&W CDM 1NT Pair --- (Center) B&W CNT --- (Sub) 2X Polk Audio PSW Series PSW10 --- (Receiver) Rotel RSX-1057 --- (Power Conditioning) UltraPower PGX-500
#5
Posted 01 December 2011 - 12:25 PM
Why? It's like 4 times more expense then a Sata SSD.
"GilliumX58" DESKTOP OCC Cool Club Member
Mobo: Asus P6TD Deluxe | Processor: Intel Core i7 920 @ 4ghz | CPU Cooler: Zalman CNPS9900MAXR | Videocard: MSI Twin Frozr HD7950
Memory: OCZ/Patriot 18GB 1600mhz | OS SSD: SanDisk Extreme 240GB SATA | PSU: PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750W
Monitor: *Debranded* HP 24" 2408H | CD/DVD: Samsung SH-S223F | Keyboard: Razer Tarantula | Mouse: Razer Lachesis
#6
Posted 15 June 2012 - 02:53 AM
Basically, after a long painstaking driver installation process, here is what I have gathered:
The drive can be picked up by the kernel driver 'mvsas' but this shows the drive as four 60GB drives. In fact, it would seem that OCZ has simply bundled four SSDs onto a board and provided a SCSI/RAID controller chip to RAID 0 these drives, thus the advertised performance specs. lspci shows this device as: "SCSI Storage controller: OCZ Technology Group, Inc. RevoDrive 3 X2 PCI-Express SSD 240GB (Marvell Controller) (rev 02)".
So the first issue is that it appears that you can use this device as four separate drives, but even that is not actually entirely true. If you do want to use this as a separate 60GBx4 drive then you'll soon find out that you cannot boot from, let's say the first drive (/dev/sda1), because grub can't even install its bootloader to the device. The only other solution to work around this is to use the proprietary ocz10xx.ko driver for some of the other OCZ PCIe-based devices. You will find that this kernel module has been compiled for a specific handful of distributions(all 64-bit) but that those distributions are already old and outdated.
This means that this device will work fine with Ubuntu 10.10, for instance, but will not work with Ubuntu 11.12.
The second issue is that, if my theory is correct, you will not be getting the advertised read/write rates even if you do use it as a separate drive.
This is such a shame that OCZ have closed source drivers that they've only compiled for old 64-bit only linux distributions. This investigation has been a huge waste of my time and I'm pretty sure I would have been able to get similar/better performance by just RAIDing 4 normal SSDs together.
What could have been a four/five star rating is simply let down by poor driver design that renders this drive useless for my gentoo system. Hardware-wise the product has some merit. However, OCZ should learn to favour customer satisfaction and release the driver instead of undermining their product reputation so much. This item will very likely be returned if possible.
#7
Posted 15 June 2012 - 03:37 AM

Booyah.
#8
Posted 15 June 2012 - 03:51 AM















