Jump to content


Photo

Bulldozer Reviewed


  • Please log in to reply
57 replies to this topic

#1 Bosco

Bosco

    OCC Boss

  • Senior Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 32422 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada

Posted 11 October 2011 - 08:59 PM

ccokeman takes a look at AMD's new offering:

http://www.overclock...ews/amd_fx8150/

Main Gaming Rig
Intel 3960X
MSI X79A-GD65 8D
16GB of Corsair Vengeance
NVIDIA 780TI's in SLI
Corsair Force 3 GT 240GB SSD
Coolermaster 932 Case
Noctua D14 CPU Cooler
Thermaltake Toughpower XT Platinum 1275 Watts
3 X 24" LCD's
Donating to OCC :::: OCC Site Rules :::: OCC Reviews
RIP Verran and Nemo gone but never will be forgotten.


#2 El_Capitan

El_Capitan

    Even the sun goes down

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6719 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Somerville, MA

Posted 11 October 2011 - 09:09 PM

Finally... and done.

Btw, what's the max temp of the CPU? 81C seems high for an AMD chip.

I wonder if PhenomMSRTweaker would prevent that throttling from occurring?

No temp and power consumption comparisons?

#3 The Smith

The Smith

    Total Nerd

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4286 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Quebec, Canada

Posted 11 October 2011 - 09:11 PM

Well, looks like you're following me with your silver award :P


Socket 1366 OC competition - 3DMark Competition - AMD Overclocking Competition
Posted Image
"They should have just called it the Intel Core iAMBROKE." -cirro


#4 ccokeman

ccokeman

    Frank <3 Reesa

  • Reviewer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11579 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 11 October 2011 - 09:24 PM

Finally... and done.

Btw, what's the max temp of the CPU? 81C seems high for an AMD chip.

I wonder if PhenomMSRTweaker would prevent that throttling from occurring?

No temp and power consumption comparisons?


Overclocking...Power consumption..........

I can look at including them next go round!

Not sure but I can try it. Cooling 8 physical cores with big volts is pretty tough any way you look at it. 81C indicated in TurboV was the point where it throttled. In overdrive the temperatures were lower so that 81C number will be flexible depending on the program you use to monitor the chip temps. Turbo V was the recommended application.
Processor Intel Core I7 920 @ 3.6
Memory Mushkin 998995 Blackline 12GB 9-9-9-24
Motherboard MSI X58 Big Bang
Graphics ASUS GTX 580
Power Corsair AX 1200,
Monitor Gateway UXD3000, LG W3000H, ASUS VG236 x 3
Water Cooling By DangerDen & Swiftech
Follow OCC on Posted Image

#5 Stonerboy779

Stonerboy779

    Puts on Q701s d-_-b

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5270 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne, Australia

Posted 11 October 2011 - 09:26 PM

Unfortunate on the single core performance and funny how it draw more power when oced to 5ghz than the psu on the comp at my front door can supply

med_gallery_78215_532_67141.png

 

Man these spammers are geniuses...put (NO SPAM) in the thread title to hide the spam.  It's brilliant.  Hopefully this doesn't catch on...what if rapists wear signs that say (NOT A RAPIST)?  They will be raping everybody! D:

 

Donate to OCC - You could have won an SSD or GPU


#6 potatochobit

potatochobit

    Queen of Nightmares

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1438 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Texas

Posted 11 October 2011 - 09:31 PM

the conclusion I have come to is this:

when compared to intel sandybridge it is a failure

when compared to it's predecessor the phenom II, it is on par, does not raise the bar, and therefore does not push you that far.
hence, it is also a failure.
a new product should take the problems and weaknesses of its predecessor and revamp them, solve them, and increase performance.
the phenom II series never had a problem with the amount of cores available.

however, I could be wrong.
perhaps this first generation of processors was just needed to build the frame work and an improvement of 20% is otw
I really don't believe that though, and with the management shuffling going on at AMD, they probably don't believe it as well

#7 ccokeman

ccokeman

    Frank <3 Reesa

  • Reviewer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11579 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 11 October 2011 - 09:39 PM

the conclusion I have come to is this:

when compared to intel sandybridge it is a failure

when compared to it's predecessor the phenom II, it is on par, does not raise the bar, and therefore does not push you that far.
hence, it is also a failure.
a new product should take the problems and weaknesses of its predecessor and revamp them, solve them, and increase performance.
the phenom II series never had a problem with the amount of cores available.

however, I could be wrong.
perhaps this first generation of processors was just needed to build the frame work and an improvement of 20% is otw
I really don't believe that though, and with the management shuffling going on at AMD, they probably don't believe it as well


Here's the thing, they are using a forward look to try and take advantage of future applications. In Win 8 there is a boost from what I have read but not having tested it I can only go with what I have read. Win 8 is not released or ready for prime time so what happens with a beta build may not be reality. In apps that can use the new instruction sets they may well outperform the current levels of performance.

From everything I have read and seen Piledriver is supposed to being back some of the giveaways. A die shrink of thuban may have been the best choice to please the masses but in heavily multi threaded applications in a server environment this thing may just shine!
Processor Intel Core I7 920 @ 3.6
Memory Mushkin 998995 Blackline 12GB 9-9-9-24
Motherboard MSI X58 Big Bang
Graphics ASUS GTX 580
Power Corsair AX 1200,
Monitor Gateway UXD3000, LG W3000H, ASUS VG236 x 3
Water Cooling By DangerDen & Swiftech
Follow OCC on Posted Image

#8 My_Inner_Fred

My_Inner_Fred

    Being Lazy

  • Folding Member
  • 1318 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sugar Land, TX

Posted 11 October 2011 - 09:48 PM

Doesn't seem that great, Intels price probably won't budge much if at all.

Main Rig

Mobo: ASUS P67 Sabertooth | GPU: EVGA Nvidia GTX 460 768MB | GPU2: EVGA Nvidia 520 GT 1GB | PSU: Raidmax 850W Gold Cert. | CPU: Intel I7-2600k 3.4GHz OCed to 4.6Ghz | RAM: (2x4GB) G.Skill Ripjaws X series 8GB 1600Mhz

RAM2: (2x4GB) G.Skill Ripjaws X series 8GB 1866Mhz(running at 1600Mhz) | HS: Corsair H70 Water Cooling | HDDs: OCZ Vertex 2 60GB/WD Caviar Black 1TB/WD Caviar Green 1TB | CD/DVD: ASUS DVD/CD Drive

WolfandSpice_1341388341.jpgMy_Inner_Fred.jpg


#9 Stonerboy779

Stonerboy779

    Puts on Q701s d-_-b

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5270 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne, Australia

Posted 11 October 2011 - 10:13 PM

Everyone seems to try and redeem it with the multi threaded application of the bulldozer 8-core cpu, well imo would not sandybridge-e blow it out of the water with two i73960Xs easily overclocked to 5th on water running 12 physical and 12 virtual cores...

However from a price point buldozer far cheaper. Unfortunate for the most part that it seems like sidestep on current amd CPUs

med_gallery_78215_532_67141.png

 

Man these spammers are geniuses...put (NO SPAM) in the thread title to hide the spam.  It's brilliant.  Hopefully this doesn't catch on...what if rapists wear signs that say (NOT A RAPIST)?  They will be raping everybody! D:

 

Donate to OCC - You could have won an SSD or GPU


#10 nickk47

nickk47

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 245 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada

Posted 12 October 2011 - 12:03 AM

Looks like it turned out alright. I really did not expect a "gasp" from the bulldozer...But I don't know about going the whole full-platform thing. Its nice, but could potentially turn away buyers who might think "oh my system doesnt have this AMD or that AMD. I might as well go "this brand" and "that brand" and so on...You know?

| AMD A10-5800K @ 4.4GHz 1.46Vcore | Asus F2A85-V | AMD 7770HD 1GB | Asus N53 Wireless | Asus 21.5 Inch LED Monitor | Corsair Force GS 128GB | Corsair Vengeance 8GB 1866MHz @ 9-9-9-27 | Seasonic FL2 460W Platinum | Corsair Carbide 200R with Sound Dampening | Corsair H60 Cooler |


#11 medbor

medbor

    Geek

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 884 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sweden

Posted 12 October 2011 - 03:14 AM

powerconsumtion, 455W from the wall at 4.77GHz is unacceptible...

CPU - C2Q Q6600 @1.2-3,05 GHz |#| RAM - 4GB (2x2GB) DDR2-800 Kingston ValueRam
GPU - MSI Radeon HD4830 512MB @ 295-700MHz |#| GPU2 - GeForce 7500LE 128MB
Cooler - Hyper 212+ (push/pull) |#| SSD - Vertex 2 60GB |#| MoBo - Gigabyte GA-965P-DS4
SATA HDDs - HD154UI 1.5TB, 15EARS 1.5TB, 20EARS 2.0TB, HD501LJ 0.5TB, WD 160GB
USB-HDDs - Seagate 1.0TB |#| Case - Aerocool T40 |#| ODD - PATA DVD-RW |#| PSU - 500W
Screens - Samsung 226BW (Main), HP w19b (Right), Acer V233H (Portrait), SwedX 40" (TV)


#12 cery25

cery25

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 405 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Romania

Posted 12 October 2011 - 03:32 AM

I am verry disappointed........ :down:

Thermaltake V3 BE -- 3 x 120mm blue leds -- AeroCool F6XT
I5 3570k -4Ghz -- Corsair H60 -- Msi Z77A-G43
Asus HD6870  -- K. HyperX 2x2 Gb DDR3 1600
Wd 500 Gb -- Lc Power Titan 2 600w -- Acer V243HQ
Thermaltake Challenger -- Gigayte M6880 Laser Game

2138774.png