Seagate's Barracuda XT 3TB Hard Drive Examined
#1
Posted 01 June 2011 - 03:47 AM
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 2.83GHz / ASUS P5Q Deluxe / Patriot Extreme Performance 2GB PC2-9600 DDR2-1200MHz / 2x Seagate ST3160827AS 160GB RAID 1 / Seagate ST31000340AS 1TB
Corsair TX750W / Sapphire HD 5870 1GB GDDR5 / SilverStone TJ05 / Scythe Zipang 140mm CPU Cooler / ASUS VH202T-P 20" widescreen monitor (x2) / XP Pro SP 3
"however, i cannot claim to be such a fish as i am not a fish at all..." - hardnrg,Jul 4 2005, 02:49 PM

#2
Posted 01 June 2011 - 09:41 AM
Nobody should ever run their OS drive off of something this big, a nice 500gb for OS and a low power storage 3TB is a better setup and probably costs less than this drive alone.
Good review though, very thorough testing but it concluded as I imagined it would
"GilliumX58" DESKTOP OCC Cool Club Member
Mobo: Asus P6TD Deluxe | Processor: Intel Core i7 920 @ 4ghz | CPU Cooler: Zalman CNPS9900MAXR | Videocard: MSI Twin Frozr HD7950
Memory: OCZ/Patriot 18GB 1600mhz | OS SSD: SanDisk Extreme 240GB SATA | PSU: PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750W
Monitor: *Debranded* HP 24" 2408H | CD/DVD: Samsung SH-S223F | Keyboard: Razer Tarantula | Mouse: Razer Lachesis
#3
Posted 01 June 2011 - 09:47 AM
Wow, Seagate's still trying to sell these overpriced whales. I'd rather go for a Barracuda LP, WD Green, Samsung 5400rpm or Hitachi's drives. Drives of this size aren't justifiable at $230
Nobody should ever run their OS drive off of something this big, a nice 500gb for OS and a low power storage 3TB is a better setup and probably costs less than this drive alone.
Good review though, very thorough testing but it concluded as I imagined it would
Although I don't think the price is right at this point in time, I for one only use 7200RPM drives or greater in my main PC. I don't want 5400RPM crap, nor one of those variable "green" ones, sorry.

- Xfire - GameSpot - Steam - Raptr - Kongregate - last.fm - Yahoo! Answers - F@H -
- ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe - i7 3770k - ASUS ENGTX460 TOP - 2x8GB Mushkin Redline DDR3-1866MHz -
::: Follow OCC on
::: OCC Xfire Clan ::: OCC Steam Community Group ::: OCC Rules :::
::: OCC E3 2012 Awards ::: CES 2013 ::: COMPUTEX 2010 :::
::: Far Cry 3: Blood Dragon Review :::
#4
Posted 01 June 2011 - 09:54 AM
Although I don't think the price is right at this point in time, I for one only use 7200RPM drives or greater in my main PC. I don't want 5400RPM crap, nor one of those variable "green" ones, sorry.
Intel 2600K @ 4.8
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution
16GB of Corsair Vengeance
NVIDIA GTX 690
Corsair Force 3 GT 240GB SSD
Corsair 600T
H100 Cooling
Corsair AX1200 PSU
3 X 24" LCD's in Surround
Support OCC :::: Donating to OCC :::: DIGG OCC! :::: OCC Site Rules :::: OCC Reviews
RIP Verran gone but never will be forgotten.
#5
Posted 01 June 2011 - 10:00 AM
Think again Seagate.
Current System
[CPU]Intel Xeon W3670 (i7-970) @3.20Ghz---[CPU Cooling]Thermalright Silver Arrow---[MOBO]ASUS Rampage Gene III---[RAM]G-Skill Rip Jaws (24GB)(6x4GB)---[GPU]CrossFire Gigabyte HD 7950's OC---[PSU]KingWin Lazar LZ-1000---[CASE]Bitfenix Colossus Venom Edition---[HDDs]WD Dives(6.5TB total storage) and Crucial 128GB SSD(boot)---[Monitors] 3X NEC 24" LCD2490WUXi ISP Panels
PC 2.0 Audio System (Speakers) Triad InRoom Mini Pair - (Receiver) Marantz SR-4400 (Power Conditioning) - UltraPower PGX-500
My 5.2 Room Theater System (Speakers) B&W CDM 1NT Pair --- (Center) B&W CNT --- (Sub) 2X Polk Audio PSW Series PSW10 --- (Receiver) Rotel RSX-1057 --- (Power Conditioning) UltraPower PGX-500
#6
Posted 01 June 2011 - 10:14 AM
Dude you couldn't even tell the difference, I have a Barracuda LP 5900RPM and even admittedly used one for my friend's computer, as the primary drive. It was very fast and quiet, and CERTAINLY fast enough for a storage drive which will be sitting idle for 90% of the time.Although I don't think the price is right at this point in time, I for one only use 7200RPM drives or greater in my main PC. I don't want 5400RPM crap, nor one of those variable "green" ones, sorry.
You using your storage drives like servers too?
I feel the same way.
precisely, though the highest capacity is always a little overpriced (same was true with 2TB when it came out vs two 1TBs) but this is way out of line with the Hitachi 3TB being available for $140.Thats way to expensive. I bought my 2TB drive for 65 bucks on newegg. I could get two 2TB drives for less then the price of one 3TB?!?!?!
Think again Seagate.
"GilliumX58" DESKTOP OCC Cool Club Member
Mobo: Asus P6TD Deluxe | Processor: Intel Core i7 920 @ 4ghz | CPU Cooler: Zalman CNPS9900MAXR | Videocard: MSI Twin Frozr HD7950
Memory: OCZ/Patriot 18GB 1600mhz | OS SSD: SanDisk Extreme 240GB SATA | PSU: PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750W
Monitor: *Debranded* HP 24" 2408H | CD/DVD: Samsung SH-S223F | Keyboard: Razer Tarantula | Mouse: Razer Lachesis
#7
Posted 01 June 2011 - 10:51 AM
I will never touch a Hitachi drive ever again.Dude you couldn't even tell the difference, I have a Barracuda LP 5900RPM and even admittedly used one for my friend's computer, as the primary drive. It was very fast and quiet, and CERTAINLY fast enough for a storage drive which will be sitting idle for 90% of the time.
You using your storage drives like servers too?![]()
precisely, though the highest capacity is always a little overpriced (same was true with 2TB when it came out vs two 1TBs) but this is way out of line with the Hitachi 3TB being available for $140.
I will also not pay more than $70 for a hard drive.
Case: Cooler Master CM 690 II Advanced
PSU:Enermax NAXN 750w
Memory:Corsair Vengeance LP 1600MHz 9-9-9-24
Mobo: ASRock P67 Fatal1ty Professional
CPU: Core i5 2500k @ 4.7 GHz
GPU: Inno3D GTX 470 Hawk @ 702/1404/1674
Cooling: Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo With 1x stock fan, 1x CM Sickleflow fan
Storage: 2x 1.5TB, 1x 250GB
Frankenstein
#8
Posted 01 June 2011 - 12:01 PM
Ok fine, a Western Digital Green 3TB for $150I will never touch a Hitachi drive ever again.
I will also not pay more than $70 for a hard drive.
"GilliumX58" DESKTOP OCC Cool Club Member
Mobo: Asus P6TD Deluxe | Processor: Intel Core i7 920 @ 4ghz | CPU Cooler: Zalman CNPS9900MAXR | Videocard: MSI Twin Frozr HD7950
Memory: OCZ/Patriot 18GB 1600mhz | OS SSD: SanDisk Extreme 240GB SATA | PSU: PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750W
Monitor: *Debranded* HP 24" 2408H | CD/DVD: Samsung SH-S223F | Keyboard: Razer Tarantula | Mouse: Razer Lachesis
#9
Posted 01 June 2011 - 12:55 PM
The differences between a 5400/5900 RPM drive and a 7200 RPM drive in normal use are so small it's almost not worth mentioning.Although I don't think the price is right at this point in time, I for one only use 7200RPM drives or greater in my main PC. I don't want 5400RPM crap, nor one of those variable "green" ones, sorry.
That said, I do have a 7200 RPM 1.5 TB drive as the primary OS drive in my HTPC - not by choice, it's just what was on sale.

Booyah.
#10
Posted 01 June 2011 - 01:14 PM
Exactly, it's like comparing an Sata3 and an Sata2 SSD, sure there are differences in speed but I guarantee you don't see them. Storage drives don't need to be break neck, they'll sit idle most of the timeThe differences between a 5400/5900 RPM drive and a 7200 RPM drive in normal use are so small it's almost not worth mentioning.
![]()
That said, I do have a 7200 RPM 1.5 TB drive as the primary OS drive in my HTPC - not by choice, it's just what was on sale.
"GilliumX58" DESKTOP OCC Cool Club Member
Mobo: Asus P6TD Deluxe | Processor: Intel Core i7 920 @ 4ghz | CPU Cooler: Zalman CNPS9900MAXR | Videocard: MSI Twin Frozr HD7950
Memory: OCZ/Patriot 18GB 1600mhz | OS SSD: SanDisk Extreme 240GB SATA | PSU: PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750W
Monitor: *Debranded* HP 24" 2408H | CD/DVD: Samsung SH-S223F | Keyboard: Razer Tarantula | Mouse: Razer Lachesis
#11
Posted 01 June 2011 - 05:14 PM
Anyone who knows anything is green job drives are slower period. Trying to say they are not or that you will not notice a difference again makes you look uneducated.
Moving massives files on my own PC's the 5900RPM and 5400RPM drives bottleneck, hence why I moved back too the 7200RPM drives. The bigger the files too move the longer it takes. The average I see is about 3-4 mins slower sometimes a tad longer if its a really big file. Now of course that doesn't sound like a lot but if you moving stuff a lot, time adds up. Samething happens when I was doing video stuff sometimes the 5900RPM bottlenecks.
Sure if you do the basics, want it cheap, less warranty (Some are only 3 Years) and don't care to be fast the drive is for you. Both types of drives have perks, it will come down too the user needs on what drive type they should have.
Intel 2600K @ 4.8
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution
16GB of Corsair Vengeance
NVIDIA GTX 690
Corsair Force 3 GT 240GB SSD
Corsair 600T
H100 Cooling
Corsair AX1200 PSU
3 X 24" LCD's in Surround
Support OCC :::: Donating to OCC :::: DIGG OCC! :::: OCC Site Rules :::: OCC Reviews
RIP Verran gone but never will be forgotten.
#12
Posted 01 June 2011 - 05:26 PM
The transfer rate on my 2TB 'green' drive is abysmal, I really wish I had spent the extra money on one a bit better.I don't want 5400RPM crap, nor one of those variable "green" ones, sorry.

Rig specs:














