Kingston HyperX H2O PC3 16000 6GB Memory Kit Reviewed
#1
Posted 29 September 2010 - 02:20 AM
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 2.83GHz / ASUS P5Q Deluxe / Patriot Extreme Performance 2GB PC2-9600 DDR2-1200MHz / 2x Seagate ST3160827AS 160GB RAID 1 / Seagate ST31000340AS 1TB
Corsair TX750W / Sapphire HD 5870 1GB GDDR5 / SilverStone TJ05 / Scythe Zipang 140mm CPU Cooler / ASUS VH202T-P 20" widescreen monitor (x2) / XP Pro SP 3
"however, i cannot claim to be such a fish as i am not a fish at all..." - hardnrg,Jul 4 2005, 02:49 PM

#2
Posted 29 September 2010 - 07:34 AM
Funny, earlier this week I was surfing the web like a madman, looking for a legit review of these Modules. Lo and behold one drops in right under my nose here at OCC. Thank You Ccokeman for the Review. I am wondering why Kingston would apply what seems to be a decent cooling solution to a somewhat average set of modules. I think their air-cooled versions are higher performing that these. I just cannot believe its the cooling solution that is holding these back, my guess is that its the quality of the ram. Why they wouldnt put their best modules up for this solution is beyond my kin.Today we're looking at a memory kit that comes set up for water cooling straight from the manufacturer as we check out the Kingston HyperX H2O PC3 16000 3x2GB Cas 9 - http://www.overclock...ton_hyperx_h20/
Silverstone Raven 2 case---Corsair Silent Pro 1200ex PSU
Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H--Intel i5-2500k @4.2ghz
Mushkin-Redline 2x4gig @1833 8-9-8-24, Noctua NH-D14
Evga GTX 680----LG Blu-Ray Combo Optical Drive
Creative Fatality Pro X-Fi---Creative Z2300 2.1 200watt Spkrs
Crucial M4 SATA 3 128g SSD--1tb-Samsung SATA 3 HDD
Planar 27" HDMI-Monitor 1920x1080
#3
Posted 29 September 2010 - 08:17 AM
Ccokeman can correct me if I'm wrong, but it was not the cooling solution that held these back, but rather his CPU.Funny, earlier this week I was surfing the web like a madman, looking for a legit review of these Modules. Lo and behold one drops in right under my nose here at OCC. Thank You Ccokeman for the Review. I am wondering why Kingston would apply what seems to be a decent cooling solution to a somewhat average set of modules. I think their air-cooled versions are higher performing that these. I just cannot believe its the cooling solution that is holding these back, my guess is that its the quality of the ram. Why they wouldnt put their best modules up for this solution is beyond my kin.

- Xfire - GameSpot - Steam - Raptr - Kongregate - last.fm - Yahoo! Answers - F@H -
- ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe - i7 3770k - ASUS ENGTX460 TOP - 2x8GB Mushkin Redline DDR3-1866MHz -
::: Follow OCC on
::: OCC Xfire Clan ::: OCC Steam Community Group ::: OCC Rules :::
::: OCC E3 2012 Awards ::: CES 2013 ::: COMPUTEX 2010 :::
::: Far Cry 3: Blood Dragon Review :::
#4
Posted 29 September 2010 - 09:01 AM
Ccokeman can correct me if I'm wrong, but it was not the cooling solution that held these back, but rather his CPU.
You are correct. Frank reached the limit on his memory controller.
Intel 2600K @ 4.8
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution
16GB of Corsair Vengeance
NVIDIA GTX 690
Corsair Force 3 GT 240GB SSD
Corsair 600T
H100 Cooling
Corsair AX1200 PSU
3 X 24" LCD's in Surround
Support OCC :::: Donating to OCC :::: DIGG OCC! :::: OCC Site Rules :::: OCC Reviews
RIP Verran gone but never will be forgotten.
#5
Posted 29 September 2010 - 02:04 PM

Booyah.
#6
Posted 29 September 2010 - 09:13 PM
I guess I don't get it. My current ram stock frequency is 1333 at 9-9-9-24. Yeah I can tighten them up to 7-7-7-20 but at the stock settings they overclock better up into 1600mhz range.
Good modules but loose is not a word that can be applied to these timings at that high of speed.

I painted this.
If I told you, you wouldn't believe me.
#7
Posted 29 September 2010 - 09:18 PM
I don't know why 9-10-9-27 is bad at 2000mhz +
I guess I don't get it. My current ram stock frequency is 1333 at 9-9-9-24. Yeah I can tighten them up to 7-7-7-20 but at the stock settings they overclock better up into 1600mhz range.
Good modules but loose is not a word that can be applied to these timings at that high of speed.
When you have memory that can run Cas 6 and 7 at these speeds yup loose is a word I would use. But these modules can do 7-9-7 at 2000Mhz with some voltage tweaking so there is room for improvement unless I have my reviews mixed up!
Memory Mushkin 998995 Blackline 12GB 9-9-9-24
Motherboard MSI X58 Big Bang
Graphics ASUS GTX 580
Power Corsair AX 1200,
Monitor Gateway UXD3000, LG W3000H, ASUS VG236 x 3
Water Cooling By DangerDen & Swiftech
Follow OCC on
#8
Posted 30 September 2010 - 08:59 AM
I guess I didn't realize timings were getting so tight. Thanks buddyWhen you have memory that can run Cas 6 and 7 at these speeds yup loose is a word I would use. But these modules can do 7-9-7 at 2000Mhz with some voltage tweaking so there is room for improvement unless I have my reviews mixed up!

I painted this.
If I told you, you wouldn't believe me.
#9
Posted 30 September 2010 - 08:19 PM
Memory Mushkin 998995 Blackline 12GB 9-9-9-24
Motherboard MSI X58 Big Bang
Graphics ASUS GTX 580
Power Corsair AX 1200,
Monitor Gateway UXD3000, LG W3000H, ASUS VG236 x 3
Water Cooling By DangerDen & Swiftech
Follow OCC on














