Kingston SSD NOW V Series 128GB Tested
#1
Posted 15 April 2010 - 09:06 PM
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 2.83GHz / ASUS P5Q Deluxe / Patriot Extreme Performance 2GB PC2-9600 DDR2-1200MHz / 2x Seagate ST3160827AS 160GB RAID 1 / Seagate ST31000340AS 1TB
Corsair TX750W / Sapphire HD 5870 1GB GDDR5 / SilverStone TJ05 / Scythe Zipang 140mm CPU Cooler / ASUS VH202T-P 20" widescreen monitor (x2) / XP Pro SP 3
"however, i cannot claim to be such a fish as i am not a fish at all..." - hardnrg,Jul 4 2005, 02:49 PM

#2
Posted 17 April 2010 - 07:11 PM

Booyah.
#3
Posted 19 April 2010 - 06:48 AM
I'm sure that OS load times are stellar considering the read times posted in the review.
i7 2600K, ASRock Z68 Extreme-7 Mainboard,
16GB GSKill RipJaws DDR3-2133,
Corsair H80 CPU Cooler,
EVGA GTX-680 2GB,
240GB-Mushkin Cronos SATA-III SSD,
Two SATA-III WD 1TB Blacks in RAID-0,
Rosewill Blackhawk Ultra Case
#4
Posted 19 April 2010 - 08:44 AM
load time for what? OS? everyone already knows that SSD's drastically improve that aspectStill no load time comparisons? It would make choosing between an SSD and a traditional HDD easier for those many.
#5
Posted 19 April 2010 - 09:06 AM
Various games and applications would be useful (or game load times while running an antivirus scan at the same time). Most people know SSDs make loading times go down but it's extremely hard to base a buying decision based on simple benchmark data alone because it doesn't always tell the whole story. I know the only reason I finally broke down and bought one was because I read a few reviews that had multitasking load times (various things loading at the same time) and a few game load time results.load time for what? OS? everyone already knows that SSD's drastically improve that aspect

Booyah.
#6
Posted 19 April 2010 - 10:13 AM
Intel 2600K @ 4.8
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution
16GB of Corsair Vengeance
NVIDIA GTX 690
Corsair Force 3 GT 240GB SSD
Corsair 600T
H100 Cooling
Corsair AX1200 PSU
3 X 24" LCD's in Surround
Support OCC :::: Donating to OCC :::: DIGG OCC! :::: OCC Site Rules :::: OCC Reviews
RIP Verran gone but never will be forgotten.
#7
Posted 19 April 2010 - 06:44 PM
I understand that it takes longer but it would make the SSD / HDD reviews infinitely more valuable. Making a system image that includes all games and applications needed to test the drives would make things relatively simple...just copy the image to each drive to test (or look up old test numbers) and run from there. As far as the OCC reviews are concerned all SSDs are incredibly fast and there's nearly no distinction between them...The only reason we don't do load times is there is way to many varibles and the time it would take to retest every single drive we just don't have.
I value OCC's reviews a lot for most things but when it comes to SSD / HDD reviews I tend to look elsewhere simply because load times aren't included at all in OCC reviews. It hurts to say that because I consider OCC my home in terms of tech sites.

Booyah.
#8
Posted 19 April 2010 - 09:29 PM
I understand that it takes longer but it would make the SSD / HDD reviews infinitely more valuable. Making a system image that includes all games and applications needed to test the drives would make things relatively simple...just copy the image to each drive to test (or look up old test numbers) and run from there. As far as the OCC reviews are concerned all SSDs are incredibly fast and there's nearly no distinction between them...
I value OCC's reviews a lot for most things but when it comes to SSD / HDD reviews I tend to look elsewhere simply because load times aren't included at all in OCC reviews. It hurts to say that because I consider OCC my home in terms of tech sites.
Its not just as simple making an image. Don't forget, drivers, Patches, window updates all affect load times. I could test 5 different drives and one mistake could screw everything up.
Thats why I don't allow it to many things make it not accurate. Going back and retesting every single drive for every single game patch etc is very time consuming. Which is why we will prob not be doing them down the road.
Intel 2600K @ 4.8
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution
16GB of Corsair Vengeance
NVIDIA GTX 690
Corsair Force 3 GT 240GB SSD
Corsair 600T
H100 Cooling
Corsair AX1200 PSU
3 X 24" LCD's in Surround
Support OCC :::: Donating to OCC :::: DIGG OCC! :::: OCC Site Rules :::: OCC Reviews
RIP Verran gone but never will be forgotten.
#9
Posted 19 April 2010 - 10:31 PM
I understand that it takes longer but it would make the SSD / HDD reviews infinitely more valuable. Making a system image that includes all games and applications needed to test the drives would make things relatively simple...just copy the image to each drive to test (or look up old test numbers) and run from there. As far as the OCC reviews are concerned all SSDs are incredibly fast and there's nearly no distinction between them...
I value OCC's reviews a lot for most things but when it comes to SSD / HDD reviews I tend to look elsewhere simply because load times aren't included at all in OCC reviews. It hurts to say that because I consider OCC my home in terms of tech sites.
I hate you sometimes
You got me thinking about this again. I will revisit this again and decide if we are going to do it or not. I will keep you posted.
Intel 2600K @ 4.8
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution
16GB of Corsair Vengeance
NVIDIA GTX 690
Corsair Force 3 GT 240GB SSD
Corsair 600T
H100 Cooling
Corsair AX1200 PSU
3 X 24" LCD's in Surround
Support OCC :::: Donating to OCC :::: DIGG OCC! :::: OCC Site Rules :::: OCC Reviews
RIP Verran gone but never will be forgotten.















