Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


 Rules

Don't want to be BANNED? Read the rules!

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
 AMD: PhysX's Nvidia Lock Will Be Its Demise, read this earlier and it was another sad shock for nvidia lovers
cirro
post Oct 11 2009, 01:26 PM
Post #1


Will work for fud.
***
Group: Members
Posts: 656
Joined: 25-March 08
From: rockford, IL
Member No.: 31,740



http://megagames.com/news/html/hardware/am...itsdemise.shtml closedeyes.gif

QUOTE
Description
With its latest driver release, Nvidia disabled hardware PhysX support in systems that use an ATI card for graphics along with an Nvidia card for physics.

AMD played down the move and said that this may be the final nail in PhysX's coffin.

"Physics can be a good thing for gamers, but it should be for all gamers. When it's available for everyone, game developers will be able to make physics an integral part of gameplay, rather than just extra eye candy. This requires a physics solution built on industry standards. That's why DirectX 11 is such a great inflection point for our industry - DirectCompute allows game physics that can be enjoyed by everyone. There are several initiatives (some open-source) that will deliver awesome GPU-based physics for everyone, using either DirectCompute or OpenCL. Industry standards will make any proprietary standard irrelevant," said Neal Robison, director of global independent software vendors relationship for AMD.

"There's a real discrepancy between what Nvidia says, and what they do. They 'say' that they are looking out for gamers' best interests. However, decisions like this are the exact opposite of gamers' best interests," Mr. Robison added.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
psycho_terror
post Oct 11 2009, 01:32 PM
Post #2


Member
Group Icon
Group: Folding Member
Posts: 416
Joined: 31-October 07
Member No.: 27,149



i can't take this seriously coming from AMD.

what exactly are they doing to get any kind of physics to gamers? at least nvidia is satisfying it's own customers, as for AMD, waiting for someone else to do it is not a positive step and i don't think they have any grounds on which to put nvidia down.

there is undoubtably an issue here, and nvidia are at fault, but AMD has not earned the right to be so flippant about this. i can almost guarantee they have done everything they can to make sure physx is not a success, and this is just another example of that.


--------------------
ASUS P5K-E WiFi // Intel Q6700 @ 3.6GHz // 4GB Kingston HyperX PC8500 // Palit GTX275
XSPC Delta CPU Block // XSPC Delta NB Block // Black Ice Xtreme II // Laing DDC + Alphacool Top
Daewoo 1680x1050 22" // Optoma GT-7000 720p 120"
Samsung F1 1TB // Seagate 7200.10 320GB // Seagate 7200.12 320GB
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cirro
post Oct 11 2009, 01:35 PM
Post #3


Will work for fud.
***
Group: Members
Posts: 656
Joined: 25-March 08
From: rockford, IL
Member No.: 31,740



is AMD hoping that their cards that can handle DX10.1 and whatnot , will be a big enough leverage to out-weigh not having nvidias PhysX support?

This post has been edited by cirro: Oct 11 2009, 01:36 PM


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
IVIYTH0S
post Oct 11 2009, 01:49 PM
Post #4


Posting Nut
Group Icon
Group: Folding Member
Posts: 7,220
Joined: 15-March 07
From: Pennsauken, NJ
Member No.: 20,152



QUOTE (psycho_terror @ Oct 11 2009, 04:32 PM) *
i can't take this seriously coming from AMD.

what exactly are they doing to get any kind of physics to gamers? at least nvidia is satisfying it's own customers, as for AMD, waiting for someone else to do it is not a positive step and i don't think they have any grounds on which to put nvidia down.

there is undoubtably an issue here, and nvidia are at fault, but AMD has not earned the right to be so flippant about this. i can almost guarantee they have done everything they can to make sure physx is not a success, and this is just another example of that.

I half agree with your post, but I don't think nvidia is "satisfying their customers" if those customers bought an 8800GT to run alongside their ATI card and can't get it to work.


--------------------
Mobo: Gigabyte EP45 EXTREME | Processor: Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 4ghz 24/hr stable!
CPU Cooler: Thermalright Ultra Extreme 120 Black w/ 2x Scythe Ultra Kazes
Memory: 2x2gb DDR2 OCZ Reaper OC'd: 1000mhz 5-5-5-15 (2.3v, nice and cool)
Videocard: (Heavy lifter)Diamond 4870x2 2GB (Physx)BFG OC 8800GT 512MB
OS Harddrive:Western Digital Veloci Raptor 300gb 10,000 Rpm SATA | PSU: PC Power and Cooling Silencer 750W
Monitor: *Debranded* HP 24" 2408H | CD/DVD: Samsung SH-S223F | Keyboard:Razer Tarantula | Mouse: Razer Lachesis
|8800GT|<3<3|5750|<3<3<3|5770|<3<3<3<3<3|4870x2|<3<3<3<3<3|5870|<3<3<3<3<3 (VideoCards I'd buy, excluding special deals. Bold means have owned/own)
_____________________________________________|\/|YT|-|0$ HAS SPOKEN!________________________________________________
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cirro
post Oct 11 2009, 01:55 PM
Post #5


Will work for fud.
***
Group: Members
Posts: 656
Joined: 25-March 08
From: rockford, IL
Member No.: 31,740



But think about what you just said... a basic user gets a nvidia chipset, a nvidia card and a ati card. the ATI card will be the only one not functioning to the specifications the user thinks it should. so do they auto blame Nvidia or the card thats not using the PhysX.

its tricky but i think nvidia is going on the "ati isnt working with my nvidia technology.. i better get another nvidia that works right"

idk though.. it seems pretty childish from both ends of the spectrum


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Crazy_Nate
post Oct 11 2009, 02:07 PM
Post #6


Philosophy begins in wonder.
*****
Group: Review Editor
Posts: 2,903
Joined: 18-February 06
From: Yorktown, VA
Member No.: 32,176



http://forums.overclockersclub.com/index.p...howtopic=168259

http://forums.overclockersclub.com/?showtopic=168207

I'm sure you can find the 3+ threads talking about how to possibly deal with this tongue.gif


--------------------
Mine:DFI SLI-DR EXPERT -- Opty 180 + Lapped TRUE -- Patriot 2x1 GB -- XFX 8800GTS 512 @ 700 -- Xplosion
WD 80GB (XP MCE SP3) / SG 250GB (Vista Business X64 SP1) -- PCP&C Silencer 610 -- TT Armor -- Sharp Aquos LC-32GP1U 1080p
GF's: DFI SLI-D (04/06/2006) -- AMD 3800+ opty heatsink -- Patriot 2x1 GB -- 9600GSO384 -- OCZ GXS 600W
Recommended Power Supplies 1 - Recommended Power Supplies 2 - DFI NF4 "proper" CMOS clear - Tmod/Logan's DFI Bios Flash & Utilities DVD
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
unknownuser200
post Oct 11 2009, 02:15 PM
Post #7


Member
**
Group: Members
Posts: 447
Joined: 11-May 09
From: scranton ,pa
Member No.: 67,333



booooo


--------------------
Coolermaster Cosmos S
Asus Rampage Extreme x48
Intel E8500
4x1gb OCZ Gold 1333
2 Sapphire 4890 vapor-x in crossfire
WD green 1tb
Thermaltake Tp 650W
Gateway Xhd3000
Windows 7 Rc 64bit


That's not a optical drive that's a dollar bill slot!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cirro
post Oct 11 2009, 02:16 PM
Post #8


Will work for fud.
***
Group: Members
Posts: 656
Joined: 25-March 08
From: rockford, IL
Member No.: 31,740



i couldn't find amd's response to it in them ...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
usaweapon777
post Oct 11 2009, 02:20 PM
Post #9


Member
**
Group: FW Team Member
Posts: 125
Joined: 18-February 09
From: ORWIGSBURG, PA
Member No.: 66,289



Nvidia could have left things alone but they are a company after all and companies try to make money in whatever way they can. I'm disapointed that they blocked phsyx assist with an ati card with the new drivers but hey who knows maybe that new hydra chip will solve all this lol rolleyes.gif


--------------------
Main rig
ASUS M3A79-T DELUXE
AMD PHENOM 9950 O.C @ 3.2
2x ATI RADEON 4870 1G in cf
GSKILL DDR2 2X2 @ 1066
PC P&C 750W
XCLIO A380 CASE
WD 500G HD
ACER 22"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bosco
post Oct 11 2009, 04:37 PM
Post #10


OCC Boss
*********
Group: Senior Admin
Posts: 27,161
Joined: 27-April 02
From: Canada
Member No.: 521



From what I have been hearing AMD needs this to happen since they can't have positive relationships with game developers the way things are now rolleyes.gif

Time will tell whats going to happen dry.gif


--------------------
Main Rig
Intel I7 920
MSI X58 Platinum
12 gigs of Mushkin Tri Channel
2 X Nvidia GTX 295 Quad SLI
2 X 1.5 Terabyte Seagate
Thermaltake Armour Case
1000 Thermaltake PSU
Samsung 30" LCD
DIGG OCC! :::: OCC Site Rules :::: OCC Reviews
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Smith
post Oct 11 2009, 04:49 PM
Post #11


Forum Wars - OCC Captain
*****
Group: Reviewer
Posts: 2,941
Joined: 7-February 08
From: Quebec, Canada
Member No.: 31,336



QUOTE (cirro @ Oct 11 2009, 04:55 PM) *
But think about what you just said... a basic user gets a nvidia chipset, a nvidia card and a ati card. the ATI card will be the only one not functioning to the specifications the user thinks it should.

Why wouldn't it work to the specifications the user thinks it should?


--------------------

Socket 1366 OC competition - 3DMark Competition - AMD Overclocking Competition - OCC IRC (channel #OCC)


QUOTE (IVIYTH0S @ Sep 13 2009, 02:55 AM) *
I did honestly believe there would be a 5870x8.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
unknownuser200
post Oct 11 2009, 05:03 PM
Post #12


Member
**
Group: Members
Posts: 447
Joined: 11-May 09
From: scranton ,pa
Member No.: 67,333



i briefly scanned through this.. just a though.. can the user use current ati drivers and somewhat older nvidia drviers to still use phys x? or should i read somemore?


--------------------
Coolermaster Cosmos S
Asus Rampage Extreme x48
Intel E8500
4x1gb OCZ Gold 1333
2 Sapphire 4890 vapor-x in crossfire
WD green 1tb
Thermaltake Tp 650W
Gateway Xhd3000
Windows 7 Rc 64bit


That's not a optical drive that's a dollar bill slot!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic


 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st November 2009 - 04:13 PM
© 2001- Overclockers Club ® Privacy Policy