Jump to content


Photo

XFX HD 5870 Tested


  • Please log in to reply
34 replies to this topic

#1 jammin

jammin

    e = MC Hammer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6337 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Southampton, UK

Posted 07 October 2009 - 10:28 PM

How will XFX's HD 5870 stack up against the competition?

Find out here - http://www.overclock..._1gb_hd587a_zn/

Posted Image
Recommended Power Supplies List - Follow OCC on Posted Image
Custom case - i5 2500K - ASUS Maximus IV Gene-Z - 8GB Mushkin - HD6670 1GB - Corsair AX850 - E-MU 0404 USB


#2 N.E.A

N.E.A

    this is what happens when you spend 100 years before the pc

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2022 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:cairo , egypt

Posted 07 October 2009 - 11:40 PM

i like xfx more than sapphire since it looks better and the warranty is better as well ...:)

nice review ........ :thumbs-up:
Simply : (^^) Mr.Brown (^^)
Core i5 2400
P8P67 Pro
G.Skill 4GB 1600MHz @1508
GTX 275
Adata SSD 64GB
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5 TB
CM V8
CM Haf-X
Cougar 700w PSU

#3 ajmatson

ajmatson

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2025 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Murrieta, Califormia

Posted 08 October 2009 - 06:07 AM

Wow what a killer performing card. Nice review :)
Follow OCC on Posted Image


Posted Image Posted Image
Posted Image

New Laptop: Lenovo T410i | Intel Core i3 370m | Intel GMA 5700MHD | 4GB (2 x 2GB) Mushkin DDR3 1067MHz | Patriot Inferno 120GB SandForce SSD


#4 Waco

Waco

    Fire means you're doing it right.

  • Reviewer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14444 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Los Alamos, NM

Posted 08 October 2009 - 06:20 AM

My only beef with the whole thing is calling Bioshock a demanding game. :lol:

Posted Image

Booyah.


#5 jammin

jammin

    e = MC Hammer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6337 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Southampton, UK

Posted 08 October 2009 - 07:23 AM

I guess it's probably time to update that canned intro eh.

Posted Image
Recommended Power Supplies List - Follow OCC on Posted Image
Custom case - i5 2500K - ASUS Maximus IV Gene-Z - 8GB Mushkin - HD6670 1GB - Corsair AX850 - E-MU 0404 USB


#6 Waco

Waco

    Fire means you're doing it right.

  • Reviewer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14444 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Los Alamos, NM

Posted 08 October 2009 - 07:33 AM

I guess it's probably time to update that canned intro eh.

Perhaps. :P

I just thought it was funny considering pretty much any card will run it at > 100 FPS with everything cranked. :D

Posted Image

Booyah.


#7 maj0rgamer

maj0rgamer

    computer person

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 911 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:United States

Posted 08 October 2009 - 08:58 AM

not bad, wouldn't mind having one of those...

nice review too, thanks!
Posted Image

#8 Bosco

Bosco

    OCC Boss

  • Senior Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 31462 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada

Posted 08 October 2009 - 10:43 AM

Perhaps. :P

I just thought it was funny considering pretty much any card will run it at > 100 FPS with everything cranked. :D


Ya its getting old lol.

We are in the process of updating our game benchmarks so that will be gone soon :)
Main Gaming Rig
Intel 2600K @ 4.8
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution
16GB of Corsair Vengeance
NVIDIA GTX 690
Corsair Force 3 GT 240GB SSD
Corsair 600T
H100 Cooling
Corsair AX1200 PSU
3 X 24" LCD's in Surround
Support OCC :::: Donating to OCC :::: DIGG OCC! :::: OCC Site Rules :::: OCC Reviews
RIP Verran gone but never will be forgotten.

#9 IVIYTH0S

IVIYTH0S

    They call me... General Help.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18594 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Pennsauken, NJ

Posted 08 October 2009 - 04:21 PM

Ya its getting old lol.

We are in the process of updating our game benchmarks so that will be gone soon :)

it's sad that efficiently coded games get shuffled away and yet the king/queen of inefficient coding: Crysis lives on :rolleyes:

Edited by IVIYTH0S, 08 October 2009 - 04:21 PM.

"GilliumX58" DESKTOP
Mobo: Asus P6TD Deluxe | Processor: Intel Core i7 920 @ 4ghz | CPU Cooler: Zalman CNPS9900MAXR | Videocard: MSI Twin Frozr HD7950
Memory: OCZ/Patriot 18GB 1600mhz | OS SSD: SanDisk Extreme 240GB SATA | PSU: PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750W
Monitor: *Debranded* HP 24" 2408H | CD/DVD: Samsung SH-S223F | Keyboard: Razer Tarantula | Mouse: Razer Lachesis

OCC Cool Club Member


GPU Comparison tool on AnAndTech


#10 tkrow21

tkrow21

    Total Nerd

  • Folding Member
  • 3711 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New York City

Posted 08 October 2009 - 04:23 PM

Perhaps. :P

I just thought it was funny considering pretty much any card will run it at > 100 FPS with everything cranked. :D


AA + AF don't work with ATI; same issue with Dead Space.
Posted Image
It's the decisions you make when you have no time to make them that define who you are.

#11 Fight Game

Fight Game

    Total Nerd

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2239 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 08 October 2009 - 05:23 PM

imo, should only benchmark games where, the least performing card isn't breaking about 70fps, since anything over that is a total waste. It's nice to see the numbers improve I guess, but hopefully people understand 70+ isn't going to make a difference, even more so if the test was at a higher resolution than they use themselves.
Dell 24" UltraSharp 2408
Vista Premium 64 bit
Gigabyte EP45-UD3R
Intel e8400 @ 4.05ghz+ (in progress)
Xigmatek s1283 cooler
GSkill 4gb 1066 ram
Nvidia 8800gts g92 512mb
GSkill 64gb ssd's in raid0
Gigabyte GC-Ramdisk 4gb (page file, temporary)
Logitech speakers, mouse, and G15 keyboard
OCZ 600w psu
Antec 900

#12 tacohunter52

tacohunter52

    R34CT1V4T3D

  • Reviewer
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2738 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Colorado

Posted 08 October 2009 - 05:31 PM

imo, should only benchmark games where, the TOP performing card isn't breaking about 70fps


Edited for you :P

The games where every card scores an insane amount of FPS tend to have bigger gaps in performance then the more stressful games.

In Crysis the biggest difference between the scores was about 20FPS. In Bioshock the biggest difference was something like 60FPS.

It just helps show how much more performance one card has over another.

I do agree though a benchmark where everything scores above 100FPS is getting a bit old.

Posted Image

Generic Most Awesome Sig