XFX HD 5870 Tested
#1
Posted 07 October 2009 - 10:28 PM
Find out here - http://www.overclock..._1gb_hd587a_zn/

Recommended Power Supplies List - Follow OCC on 
Custom case - i5 2500K - ASUS Maximus IV Gene-Z - 8GB Mushkin - HD6670 1GB - Corsair AX850 - E-MU 0404 USB
#2
Posted 07 October 2009 - 11:40 PM
nice review ........ :thumbs-up:
Core i5 2400
P8P67 Pro
G.Skill 4GB 1600MHz @1508
GTX 275
Adata SSD 64GB
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5 TB
CM V8
CM Haf-X
Cougar 700w PSU
#3
Posted 08 October 2009 - 06:07 AM



New Laptop: Lenovo T410i | Intel Core i3 370m | Intel GMA 5700MHD | 4GB (2 x 2GB) Mushkin DDR3 1067MHz | Patriot Inferno 120GB SandForce SSD
#4
Posted 08 October 2009 - 06:20 AM

Booyah.
#5
Posted 08 October 2009 - 07:23 AM

Recommended Power Supplies List - Follow OCC on 
Custom case - i5 2500K - ASUS Maximus IV Gene-Z - 8GB Mushkin - HD6670 1GB - Corsair AX850 - E-MU 0404 USB
#6
Posted 08 October 2009 - 07:33 AM
Perhaps.I guess it's probably time to update that canned intro eh.
I just thought it was funny considering pretty much any card will run it at > 100 FPS with everything cranked.

Booyah.
#8
Posted 08 October 2009 - 10:43 AM
Perhaps.
I just thought it was funny considering pretty much any card will run it at > 100 FPS with everything cranked.
Ya its getting old lol.
We are in the process of updating our game benchmarks so that will be gone soon
Intel 2600K @ 4.8
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution
16GB of Corsair Vengeance
NVIDIA GTX 690
Corsair Force 3 GT 240GB SSD
Corsair 600T
H100 Cooling
Corsair AX1200 PSU
3 X 24" LCD's in Surround
Support OCC :::: Donating to OCC :::: DIGG OCC! :::: OCC Site Rules :::: OCC Reviews
RIP Verran gone but never will be forgotten.
#9
Posted 08 October 2009 - 04:21 PM
it's sad that efficiently coded games get shuffled away and yet the king/queen of inefficient coding: Crysis lives onYa its getting old lol.
We are in the process of updating our game benchmarks so that will be gone soon
Edited by IVIYTH0S, 08 October 2009 - 04:21 PM.
"GilliumX58" DESKTOP OCC Cool Club Member
Mobo: Asus P6TD Deluxe | Processor: Intel Core i7 920 @ 4ghz | CPU Cooler: Zalman CNPS9900MAXR | Videocard: MSI Twin Frozr HD7950
Memory: OCZ/Patriot 18GB 1600mhz | OS SSD: SanDisk Extreme 240GB SATA | PSU: PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750W
Monitor: *Debranded* HP 24" 2408H | CD/DVD: Samsung SH-S223F | Keyboard: Razer Tarantula | Mouse: Razer Lachesis
#10
Posted 08 October 2009 - 04:23 PM
Perhaps.
I just thought it was funny considering pretty much any card will run it at > 100 FPS with everything cranked.
AA + AF don't work with ATI; same issue with Dead Space.

It's the decisions you make when you have no time to make them that define who you are.
#11
Posted 08 October 2009 - 05:23 PM
Vista Premium 64 bit
Gigabyte EP45-UD3R
Intel e8400 @ 4.05ghz+ (in progress)
Xigmatek s1283 cooler
GSkill 4gb 1066 ram
Nvidia 8800gts g92 512mb
GSkill 64gb ssd's in raid0
Gigabyte GC-Ramdisk 4gb (page file, temporary)
Logitech speakers, mouse, and G15 keyboard
OCZ 600w psu
Antec 900
#12
Posted 08 October 2009 - 05:31 PM
imo, should only benchmark games where, the TOP performing card isn't breaking about 70fps
Edited for you
The games where every card scores an insane amount of FPS tend to have bigger gaps in performance then the more stressful games.
In Crysis the biggest difference between the scores was about 20FPS. In Bioshock the biggest difference was something like 60FPS.
It just helps show how much more performance one card has over another.
I do agree though a benchmark where everything scores above 100FPS is getting a bit old.















