NVIDIA GTX 275 Reviewed
#1
Posted 02 April 2009 - 12:42 AM
Intel 2600K @ 4.8
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution
16GB of Corsair Vengeance
NVIDIA GTX 690
Corsair Force 3 GT 240GB SSD
Corsair 600T
H100 Cooling
Corsair AX1200 PSU
3 X 24" LCD's in Surround
Support OCC :::: Donating to OCC :::: DIGG OCC! :::: OCC Site Rules :::: OCC Reviews
RIP Verran gone but never will be forgotten.
#3
Posted 02 April 2009 - 03:34 AM
what's really interesting are the Fallout 3 results - what do you think is the cause of the strangely equal performance across all cards in the first three resolutions tested? is the game that optimized?
seems like the GTX 275 may be the GT200's equivalent to the older G92 core 8800 GTS 512: incredible performance (2nd most powerful single GPU solution) at a price that's significantly reduced from the current flagship model, the GTX 285. again, only talking about single GPU cards here.
Q6600 @ 3.2ghz * DFI LT-P35-T2R * 8gb Mushkin Redline DDR2-1000
XFX GTX 260 Black Edition * RAID 0 + 4 TB Storage/Backup
Corsair TX-750 * Cooler Master Stacker 830
Vista Ultimate x64[/size]
[size=1][url="http://www.overclockersclub.com/pages/folding"]OCC F@H Team[/url] * [url="http://www.student.livjm.ac.uk/cmpsgoos/usb_bootdrive_guide.htm"]hardnrg's USB Boot Drive Guide[/url] * [url="http://forums.overclockersclub.com/index.php?showtopic=71656"]graysky's C2D/C2Q OC Guide[/url] * [url="http://forums.overclockersclub.com/index.php?showtopic=78715"]OCC Rules[/url][/size]
[url="http://www.overclockersclub.com/pages/folding/"]http://overclockersc...name=razor&.jpg[/url]
#4
Posted 02 April 2009 - 03:44 AM
what's really interesting are the Fallout 3 results - what do you think is the cause of the strangely equal performance across all cards in the first three resolutions tested? is the game that optimized?
My guess would actually be the opposite.
It's an updated version of the Oblivion engine, which might explain it a bit.
I've heard that it forces v-sync even if you un-check it in the settings as well, so that could be it?
Edited by jammin, 02 April 2009 - 03:46 AM.

Recommended Power Supplies List - Follow OCC on 
Custom case - i5 2500K - ASUS Maximus IV Gene-Z - 8GB Mushkin - HD6670 1GB - Corsair AX850 - E-MU 0404 USB
#5
Posted 02 April 2009 - 04:18 AM
Asus GTX 295
Acer 24" + Acer 19"
Coolermaster CM 690
Gigabyte GA-P55-UD3P
4GB Patriot Viper-2 1600
Intel Core i7 860 @ 2.94Ghz
Great Wall 700W + TT 450W VGA
#6
Posted 02 April 2009 - 06:29 AM
what's really interesting are the Fallout 3 results - what do you think is the cause of the strangely equal performance across all cards in the first three resolutions tested? is the game that optimized?
Probably CPU limited
Some people are like slinkies - not really good for anything but they bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
#7
Posted 02 April 2009 - 06:50 AM
It uses a dynamic level of detail to maintain a constant FPS as long as the CPU can feed it and the GPU can mostly keep up.what's really interesting are the Fallout 3 results - what do you think is the cause of the strangely equal performance across all cards in the first three resolutions tested? is the game that optimized?

Booyah.
#8
Posted 02 April 2009 - 06:53 AM
Got any folding @ home numbers?
OCC Recommended Power Supplies List - The Official OCC Raid Guide - OverclockersClub Rules - OCC Market Place Forum Rules - OCC IRC

Intel i5 650 @ 3.2 -- TR AXP-140 Passive -- Mushkin Blackline 2x2GB -- Asus Gene III P55 / mATX -- WD Caviar Black 1TB -- Corsair HX 750 -- Custom HTPC Case
AMD PII X4 965 -- Mushkin Silverline 2x4GB -- ASUS M4A88T-M -- WD Caviar Black 1TB -- Corsair HX 650 -- LIAN LI PC-V354A (Silver)
#9
Posted 02 April 2009 - 07:43 AM
"GilliumX58" DESKTOP OCC Cool Club Member
Mobo: Asus P6TD Deluxe | Processor: Intel Core i7 920 @ 4ghz | CPU Cooler: Zalman CNPS9900MAXR | Videocard: MSI Twin Frozr HD7950
Memory: OCZ/Patriot 18GB 1600mhz | OS SSD: SanDisk Extreme 240GB SATA | PSU: PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750W
Monitor: *Debranded* HP 24" 2408H | CD/DVD: Samsung SH-S223F | Keyboard: Razer Tarantula | Mouse: Razer Lachesis
#10
Posted 02 April 2009 - 07:44 AM
very nice card and review. Wowsa, I wonder how much this beast will cost after it's price settles. (not that I need it since my 260 is great but still interesting)
I thought i read around 250
#11
Posted 02 April 2009 - 08:55 AM
that's starting though right? hopefully competition brings that down someI thought i read around 250
"GilliumX58" DESKTOP OCC Cool Club Member
Mobo: Asus P6TD Deluxe | Processor: Intel Core i7 920 @ 4ghz | CPU Cooler: Zalman CNPS9900MAXR | Videocard: MSI Twin Frozr HD7950
Memory: OCZ/Patriot 18GB 1600mhz | OS SSD: SanDisk Extreme 240GB SATA | PSU: PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750W
Monitor: *Debranded* HP 24" 2408H | CD/DVD: Samsung SH-S223F | Keyboard: Razer Tarantula | Mouse: Razer Lachesis
#12
Posted 02 April 2009 - 09:08 AM
But the 285 is 25 more than the 260! Who wouldn't pay the premium for 25 more... um... "nvidia units"?!that's starting though right? hopefully competition brings that down some
. This card finally makes the 280/285's absolutely worthless lol, as if a decently overclock 260 didn't already. They need to bring down the prices on the 28X's they just are too expensive for what they offer.
/sarcasm
Seriously though, that's just the way things go. Think of all the kids that show up here on post #1 with a Skulltrail board and 32GB of ram, tri-SLI 295s and 4 Raptor 300's in raid. There's too many people that just shop by highest price. They're the same people that never read any reviews and have no clue how silly the stuff they buy is. But they're the reason that Extreme Edition Intel chips exist and they're also why cards like the 28X can offer such little performance gain for so much money.

[E7400 Gaming]~[Q6600 Burning]~[Opt148 Wife's]~[3200+ HTPC1]~[3500+ HTPC2]
"Thank you for helping us help you help us all."














