Waco Posted March 9, 2012 Posted March 9, 2012 Here's my "reasonable settings" score since the extreme tessellation option makes about as much sense as the Crysis 2 setting. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
red1776 Posted March 9, 2012 Posted March 9, 2012 If you can't run Furmark at full tilt your cooling isn't good enough. I can run it, and have. I have stopped using it for the same reason that other sites have moved away from it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waco Posted March 9, 2012 Posted March 9, 2012 I can run it, and have. I have stopped using it for the same reason that other sites have moved away from it. I was just kidding. It's not a very good indication of GPU power these days but it's still a good test to see how much of a power hog your GPUs can be. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
red1776 Posted March 9, 2012 Posted March 9, 2012 I was just kidding. It's not a very good indication of GPU power these days but it's still a good test to see how much of a power hog your GPUs can be. Yeah, like Guru 3D said (I think it was) the risk to the VRM is not worth the info you get out of it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccokeman Posted March 9, 2012 Posted March 9, 2012 Yeah, like Guru 3D said (I think it was) the risk to the VRM is not worth the info you get out of it. Yep thats why I no longer use it as a power consumption test, not OCCT either. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ir_cow Posted March 9, 2012 Posted March 9, 2012 (edited) i forgot to save it. but it was 28fps and like 768 score with a 570 GTX HD Edited March 9, 2012 by hornybluecow Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
red1776 Posted March 9, 2012 Posted March 9, 2012 You ought start an actual bench thread with scores on the OP... I will indeed. i just wanted to see if there was any interest in it first Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El_Capitan Posted March 9, 2012 Posted March 9, 2012 I don't like 3.0, it's too much like 2.5. It doesn't give a good indication of what the MIN FPS is, which imo, is pretty important in a benchmark and looking for stability. At any rate, two GTX 580's in SLI at 900MHz with a dedicated GTX 560 Ti at 920MHz: Single HD 7970 at 1290MHz: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BluePanda Posted March 9, 2012 Posted March 9, 2012 CHEAT HACKSSSSSS Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stonerboy779 Posted March 10, 2012 Posted March 10, 2012 Hope you are happy Red you made me bump my GPU fans from their usual 30% to 50% so I could stay under 60C Default Settings - Stock Clocks Max Settings - Stock Clocks Extreme looked damn pretty but killed the FPS Oh and beat Waco too so I am happy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrewr05 Posted March 10, 2012 Posted March 10, 2012 *sob* I downloaded this and was ready to run it to see how my system would compare, but I can't run 1920x1080. If we do a scoring thread we should make it 1280x720 instead. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrewr05 Posted March 10, 2012 Posted March 10, 2012 1280x720 Tessellation on normal, everything else maxed. Click the link and just 'open' it in your browser versus saving it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now