VaporX Posted March 19, 2013 Posted March 19, 2013 Was not just about them pulling page hits, it was Intel wanting Hype to start. Tom's did nothing without Intel's blessing on this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccokeman Posted March 19, 2013 Posted March 19, 2013 Was not just about them pulling page hits, it was Intel wanting Hype to start. Tom's did nothing without Intel's blessing on this. I'm not so sure based on the facebook shit storm...... Unless of course that's just a ploy...... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waco Posted March 19, 2013 Posted March 19, 2013 There's no way Intel sanctioned this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IVIYTH0S Posted March 19, 2013 Posted March 19, 2013 haswell that ends well... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El_Capitan Posted March 19, 2013 Posted March 19, 2013 haswell that ends well... Lol, I was thinking that, too. From Futurama, an episode called "Roswell that ends well". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpikeSoprano Posted March 19, 2013 Posted March 19, 2013 Was not just about them pulling page hits, it was Intel wanting Hype to start. Tom's did nothing without Intel's blessing on this. Have to agree with Ed on this, Tom's has a lot of clout with all the big hardware vendors, they most likely welcomed this review. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaporX Posted March 19, 2013 Posted March 19, 2013 Was not just about them pulling page hits, it was Intel wanting Hype to start. Tom's did nothing without Intel's blessing on this. I'm not so sure based on the facebook shit storm...... Unless of course that's just a ploy...... Point this out for me, I did not see it... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccokeman Posted March 19, 2013 Posted March 19, 2013 Was not just about them pulling page hits, it was Intel wanting Hype to start. Tom's did nothing without Intel's blessing on this. I'm not so sure based on the facebook shit storm...... Unless of course that's just a ploy...... Point this out for me, I did not see it... Check out Francios posts today. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stonerboy779 Posted March 19, 2013 Posted March 19, 2013 Do you know what NDA is? NDA means NO DISCUSSION AGGREEMENT. Until the NDA is lifted all the benchmarks are BS. I am not saying any results on the net are accurate or unaccurate but Intel does not give discriminatory rights to TOM'S QUEER. I met Anand from Anandtech and he has more clout than anybody period. If Intel does not give Anand any permission, TOM"S QUEER wont either. Wow and here I was all this time thinking NDA was Non-Disclosure Agreement.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
red1776 Posted March 19, 2013 Posted March 19, 2013 Do you know what NDA is? NDA means NO DISCUSSION AGGREEMENT. Until the NDA is lifted all the benchmarks are BS. I am not saying any results on the net are accurate or unaccurate but Intel does not give discriminatory rights to TOM'S QUEER. I met Anand from Anandtech and he has more clout than anybody period. If Intel does not give Anand any permission, TOM"S QUEER wont either. Yes..Non- Disclosure Agreement. One more time, without the condescension. *** you beat me M :tongue: ** Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deathmineral Posted March 19, 2013 Posted March 19, 2013 Oh... computer nerd drama, so spicy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
d6bmg Posted March 19, 2013 Posted March 19, 2013 I am not so sure it is lack of competition, though that is a factor for sure, but more so a lack of need. Even the big professional apps that push the hardware are having trouble really keeping the CPUs fully fed. Yes, it is another very important and deciding factor behind Intel's strategy of virtually stalling the architecture improvement. And talking about why tom's did this 'leak' - who knows? And above all, who cares? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now