Nemo Posted June 1, 2009 Posted June 1, 2009 Just what kind of performance can you expect from a $100 graphics card? Check out OCC's latest review of the Sapphire HD 4770 - http://www.overclockersclub.com/reviews/sapphire_hd4770/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Smith Posted June 1, 2009 Posted June 1, 2009 (edited) The card contains 826 transistors Edit: Corrected Edited June 1, 2009 by The Smith Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ioszhka Posted June 1, 2009 Posted June 1, 2009 nice review ccokeman the only thing that I am dissapointed to see is that you didn't use the rivatuner 2.24 fix to overclock the hell out of it. bjorn3d managed to get 901 core /1000 memory and another website managed this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verran Posted June 1, 2009 Posted June 1, 2009 Good review Frank, as always. I'm curious about the 4850 numbers for the Dead Space test. In all the other game tests, the 4850 stayed a nose ahead of this card (even when it was OC'd), but in Dead Space it fell significantly behind. Do you think that's just a fluke or is there something about Dead Space that might give the newer 4770 the edge? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zertz Posted June 1, 2009 Posted June 1, 2009 I'm curious about the 4850 numbers for the Dead Space test. In all the other game tests, the 4850 stayed a nose ahead of this card (even when it was OC'd), but in Dead Space it fell significantly behind. Do you think that's just a fluke or is there something about Dead Space that might give the newer 4770 the edge? 4770 uses GDDR5, which could explain the difference Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccokeman Posted June 1, 2009 Posted June 1, 2009 nice review ccokeman the only thing that I am dissapointed to see is that you didn't use the rivatuner 2.24 fix to overclock the hell out of it. bjorn3d managed to get 901 core /1000 memory and another website managed this. I would think the memory would go higher than 1000 because that is what it is rated for. I will follow up . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccokeman Posted June 1, 2009 Posted June 1, 2009 4770 uses GDDR5, which could explain the difference I dont think that would explain the difference completely. Could be a driver issue or just a fluke. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts