Read the full review here.
Page 1 of 1
Shuttle Sb95p P4 Xpc Small Form Factor PC
#1
Posted 27 March 2005 - 10:18 AM
Main Gaming Rig
Intel 2600K @ 4.8
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution
16GB of Corsair Vengeance
NVIDIA GTX 680 or 7970's in CF (If the drivers work)
Corsair Force 3 GT 240GB SSD
Corsair 600T
H100 Cooling
Corsair AX1200 PSU
3 X 24" LCD's in Surround
Support OCC :::: Donating to OCC :::: DIGG OCC! :::: OCC Site Rules :::: OCC Reviews
RIP Verran gone but never will be forgotten.
Intel 2600K @ 4.8
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution
16GB of Corsair Vengeance
NVIDIA GTX 680 or 7970's in CF (If the drivers work)
Corsair Force 3 GT 240GB SSD
Corsair 600T
H100 Cooling
Corsair AX1200 PSU
3 X 24" LCD's in Surround
Support OCC :::: Donating to OCC :::: DIGG OCC! :::: OCC Site Rules :::: OCC Reviews
RIP Verran gone but never will be forgotten.
#2
Posted 27 March 2005 - 02:52 PM
Suggestions:
1) Use more realistic gaming benchmarks (e.g. Far Cry, Doom 3, HL2, etc.) instead of synthetic benchmarks like 3DMark.
2) No mention of the acoustic properties of the system idle and under load. This is very important if someone wants to consider using this as a HTPC.
3) Related to #2, no mention of the fan model numbers/specs.
4) Nothing mentioned about how the included PSU handled the system (e.g multimeter measurements).
5) No mentioning of the video cards used at all.
In all honesty it just looked like you threw in a couple of synthetic benchmarks and that was it. No real-world benchmarks. Anyone can run some synthetic benchmarks and make a "review." Also the comparison versus a Athlon 64 isn't very fair at all. The comparisons need to be kept as fair as possible.
1) Use more realistic gaming benchmarks (e.g. Far Cry, Doom 3, HL2, etc.) instead of synthetic benchmarks like 3DMark.
2) No mention of the acoustic properties of the system idle and under load. This is very important if someone wants to consider using this as a HTPC.
3) Related to #2, no mention of the fan model numbers/specs.
4) Nothing mentioned about how the included PSU handled the system (e.g multimeter measurements).
5) No mentioning of the video cards used at all.
In all honesty it just looked like you threw in a couple of synthetic benchmarks and that was it. No real-world benchmarks. Anyone can run some synthetic benchmarks and make a "review." Also the comparison versus a Athlon 64 isn't very fair at all. The comparisons need to be kept as fair as possible.
#3
Posted 28 March 2005 - 05:40 AM
It was a good review overall, but I wanted to know what every part used was (video card, RAM, etc.) in both systems.
I gave it a seven.
I gave it a seven.
Asus A8N SLI Delux w/ Athlon 64 3500+
1 GB (512x2) Patriot Dual Channel stuff 2-2-2-5
BFG 7800GT 256MB
3x 160GB SATA hard Drives
DL DVD-RW Drive and DVD-ROM Drive
1 GB (512x2) Patriot Dual Channel stuff 2-2-2-5
BFG 7800GT 256MB
3x 160GB SATA hard Drives
DL DVD-RW Drive and DVD-ROM Drive
#4
Posted 28 March 2005 - 07:00 AM
I'm guessing (but you didn't say explicitly) that the computer has no "normal" PCI slot. I don't know whether this is good or bad (but I'm leaning toward bad), but I do think that this should have been brought up in the review.
To second the opinion of the previous posters -- I think the review was thrown together in far too short a time. I don't know how busy you folks are, but this project just needed more time devoted to it. That said, I gave you a 9.
R.
To second the opinion of the previous posters -- I think the review was thrown together in far too short a time. I don't know how busy you folks are, but this project just needed more time devoted to it. That said, I gave you a 9.
R.
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1


Sign In »
Register Now!
Help




MultiQuote




