Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


 Rules

Don't want to be BANNED? Read the rules!

5 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Closed TopicStart new topic
 Apple On X86, Will You Consider Buying One
Will you buy an x86 based Mac?
Will you buy an x86 based Mac?
Yes [ 13 ] ** [18.57%]
No [ 42 ] ** [60.00%]
Maybe / Unsure [ 15 ] ** [21.43%]
Total Votes: 70
  
d3bruts1d
post Jun 20 2005, 03:28 AM
Post #1


 Mac User
Group Icon
Group: Donated
Posts: 7,996
Joined: 4-April 02
From: Knoxville, TN
Member No.: 717



Today's poll is going to be a simple Yes/No. With the recent announcement that Apple plans to start using Intel based processors for the Macintosh computers in 2006, has this made you consider buying a Mac? Keep in mind that this will still be a proprietary system, and Apple has said you will only be able to run Mac OS on their system.


--------------------
d 3 b r u t s 1 d


OCC: Xbox 360 // Xfire // Steam // Last.fm // Wakoopa // F@H // Rules
d3bruts1d.com | Profiles: XBL // LFM // FLX // FF // TW // PL // SV // Others
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Members, log in to remove these ads. Guests, register and remove these ads and the intext green mouseover ads :).
DECwakeboarder
post Jun 20 2005, 03:31 AM
Post #2


BrutePC.com
Group Icon
Group: Folding Member
Posts: 2,712
Joined: 11-June 04
From: Normal, IL
Member No.: 10,594



Depends on how they end up performing.


--------------------

QUOTE
So kudos to Congress for literally..uhh...taking a giant s*** on the poorest people in the country...because they deserve it! Well done folks!

4400+ X2......DFI Infinity nf4 SLI
x850xt............XP-120 w/ 38mm Panaflo
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fire_storm
post Jun 20 2005, 03:37 AM
Post #3


ZOCOM
Group Icon
Group: Folding Member
Posts: 3,285
Joined: 21-October 04
Member No.: 13,060



Maybe if I had a lot of money and get one for school but problay will not buy a mac.


--------------------
Intel Xeon X3360 @2.83GHZ
G.Skill 2 x2gb sticks @ 533mhz PC2 8500
800 watt OCZ Elite X Stream
Evga 8800GTS
Gigabyte-X48-DQ6, Thermalright-ultra 120 extreme, Aero extreme turbine fan
150GB SATA western digital raptor, 750GB SATA western digitial hd
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
neddamttocs
post Jun 20 2005, 03:40 AM
Post #4


All that we know is nothing can be known. - Socrates
***
Group: Moderator
Posts: 1,526
Joined: 28-October 04
From: Hamilton, ON
Member No.: 13,228



not really, i prefer the windows/linux pcs over macintosh ... i know they are great for video editing and sound boards (props to stage crew) but if they go x86 they would IMO lose that edge they have in that feild ... not to mention thier OS sucks (IMO)


--------------------

OCC Rules || OC Basics || OC Software

| Intel E8400 | Gigabyte P35-D3SR | 4GB of G.Skill PQ 8000 RAM | HD3750 512MB Toxic Edition | PC Power & Cooling Silencer 610 |
| 2x 320GB in Raid0 for OS + 750GB for data + 1TB for stuff |
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Verran
post Jun 20 2005, 03:43 AM
Post #5


Did everything just taste purple for a second?
*****
Group: Moderator
Posts: 5,159
Joined: 24-October 04
From: Lansing, MI
Member No.: 13,138



Mac used to be cool because of the RISC archetecture.....

Now they'll be cool because they use...... Intel?

No thanks, I'll stick with my AMD thanks! Although, like I said before, I do consider ANY competition for windows to be a good thing, even if I don't plan to use it.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kamikaze_Badger
post Jun 20 2005, 04:55 AM
Post #6


They're staring into your soul.
Group Icon
Group: Folding Member
Posts: 8,034
Joined: 27-June 04
From: Stalker!
Member No.: 10,892



Didn't Mac use PPC after RISC? Or is PPC a variation of RISC? Baaaah, I'm confyewsatated... like when trying to write that "free porn" program that took advantage of markies code...



ON TOPIC NOW...


No, I wouldn't. Why? I hate OSX, I hate Macs. Why? Every time I've done any editing on them, I could of done it faster and more effeciently using software on an x86 rig running windows. Every time I would try to record sound, it would freeze. Renders take MUCH LONGER than with my PC.


And, the shell is too restricting.


--------------------
I'm poorer than Andrew w/ a worse system. Donate today to zsilverfox@gmail.com!
10 June 2009
ಠ_ಠ
QUOTE (suchuwato towards ExRoadie)
You couldn't have produced a better quote to make me distrust everything you say. Thanks :P

s

๏̯͡๏
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CNUco2007
post Jun 20 2005, 05:07 AM
Post #7


Southpark Rules!
**
Group: Members
Posts: 1,001
Joined: 19-August 04
From: Virginia, USA
Member No.: 11,772



I said i would use it. Although it will depend on its performance. I like macs because they are much better quality than PC's and i'm afraid they might lose it now that they are going the PC way. I guess we'll have to see what happens. i DO however love OS X. It's just much more stable than windows. My laptop has never locked up on me. My Windows machine has though. eh


--------------------
user posted image

My Computer!
- A64 3800+
- 1Gb OCZ Plat Rev 2
- X800XT Volt Modded
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Coolzero101
post Jun 20 2005, 05:20 AM
Post #8


Party time , Excellent
***
Group: Members
Posts: 1,502
Joined: 30-November 03
From: far far away.
Member No.: 7,058



QUOTE(CNUco2007 @ Jun 20 2005, 05:07 AM)
I said i would use it. Although it will depend on its performance. I like macs because they are much better quality than PC's and i'm afraid they might lose it now that they are going the PC way. I guess we'll have to see what happens. i DO however love OS X. It's just much more stable than windows. My laptop has never locked up on me. My Windows machine has though. eh
[right][snapback]495115[/snapback][/right]


Macs are not much better quality then PC's. I don't want to flame but don't make such bold statements. Macs are often "prettier" because of their inflated cost, any equivilent in cost pre-built will blow a mac away in "quality". Its not my opinion its fact. This is why MAC controls so little of the market. We will have to see. Windows is compatible with so much hardware and software, thats why it can be considered unstable, its not easy to keep up with the latest and greatest all the time. For OSX its not a problem because they don't have much to do other then make shiny cases. coughcoughjustlookattheipod


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
adrenalinepcs
post Jun 20 2005, 05:54 AM
Post #9


7765656400
Group Icon
Group: Folding Member
Posts: 1,171
Joined: 27-October 03
From: Harrison, AR
Member No.: 6,587



no i wouldn't. why? because i could never afford any computer over $200. lol


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
andrusk
post Jun 20 2005, 06:03 AM
Post #10


The Indoor Wanderer
****
Group: Seti & Folding Member
Posts: 4,314
Joined: 23-February 03
From: Arizona
Member No.: 3,339



I would consider buying osx for the pc, but I will not buy anything proprietary. If I cant dual boot between windows, linux, and mac, they can forget about it.


--------------------
These stats don't matter, suffice it to say I've spent too much money on my computer.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

5 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Closed TopicStart new topic


 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 6th January 2009 - 08:17 PM
© 2001- Overclockers Club ® Privacy Policy
Bridged By IpbWiki: Integration Of Invision Power Board and MediaWiki © GlobalSoft